Editorial:
Higher profile for safety
Nevada OSHA appears to be responding to reports of its lax dealings with contractors
Wed, Apr 23, 2008 (2:08 a.m.)
The state agency that investigates safety on the job released a report Monday showing that it did not waver from its original findings after the Jan. 14 death of a worker, 58-year-old Michael Taylor, at the construction site of the Cosmopolitan on the Strip.
It also did not dismiss or water down its findings in the Nov. 27 death of construction worker David Rabun, 30, also at the Cosmopolitan site.
These cases represent a significant departure from recent practices of the Nevada Occupational Safety and Health Administration. An ongoing series of stories by Las Vegas Sun reporter Alexandra Berzon has documented a disturbing pattern by Nevada OSHA in response to fatal Strip construction accidents, of which there have been nine since the end of 2006.
Nevada OSHA, after standard post-accident conferences with the companies it had cited for safety violations, would often withdraw the citations or reduce their penalties.
The post-accident conferences concerning the deaths of Taylor and Rabun, however, were held after Berzon began making inquiries in February. Now, it would seem, Nevada OSHA is taking safety enforcement more seriously.
In the case of the conference concerning Taylor’s death, the subcontractor that had been cited argued that it wasn’t at fault. Nevertheless, Nevada OSHA neither withdrew the citations nor reduced the assessed fines. This same scenario, although involving another subcontractor, occurred in the conference about Rabun’s death.
Both subcontractors are appealing their cases to a review board, which is the normal route in accidents involving deaths. OSHA officials at the federal level have told Berzon that only rarely should state agencies reduce or withdraw their citations during conferences about fatal accidents.
Contractors receiving citations will almost always contest them, as their safety records are examined whenever they bid on jobs. But the facts are what should be speaking the loudest to Nevada OSHA, not contractors with an obvious interest in maintaining clean records.
Discussion: 1 comment so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Editors’ Picks
- Not quite A/C, and one big, hot mess
- Culture as part of the game
- Las Vegas man killed in two-car collision
- Keeping his work alive
- Fans flock to speedway’s fireworks show
- When will Bush be held accountable?
- Nostalgia ushers in holiday for downtown crowd
- Down and out in Las Vegas
- Jeff Haney glimpses a World Series ‘Big One’ that’s sure to be high on drama, attendance
- Art theft! Lawsuits! Spielberg!
Calendar
- American Idols Live! (7 p.m.)
- Michael Grimm (6 p.m. to 9 p.m.)
- UFC 86: Jackson vs. Griffin (8 p.m.)
- American Pie 4th of July (4 p.m. to midnight)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.


WOW!!!finally some attention to these very serious problems. However, OSHA is only a portion of the problem. The unions need to come together and represent their men and let these contractors know they will not stand for losing men. The death of one man should have sent shockwaves through his union but it didn't. It was business as usual. Life goes on type of attitude. Chuch Lenhart let me know that it was "the nature of the business" when I lost my loved one. OSHA can uphold their measly little fines and the companies will work harder to get the contract later(with citations on their record) but what about the union officials. They are PAID by the worker to represent that worker. Union officials are there for the well-being of that worker and it's not voluntary work. Do your job union officials and stand up for your men. Put pressure on contractors as well as OSHA and make these sites as safe as possible. No one wants another family member to suffer as we have. Come on chuck, grow a spine and stand up for your men. EARN some respect here. I have yet to hear "I'm sorry for your loss" from any representative of Local 433. Nothing from Chuck, nothing from Robbie. The members of local 433 were wonderful but the administration was horrendous. My loved one paid you to take care of him and you cannot even express condolences to his family. Maybe you should refund the money he paid out.