Las Vegas Sun

May 12, 2008

Lake’s ghost town seen as a warning

To some, emergence of town’s remains is sign that water poses eternal challenge to Vegas, all of Southwest

Wed, Mar 12, 2008 (2 a.m.)

Image

Leila Navidi

Aaron McArthur, a UNLV doctoral student writing a history of St. Thomas for the National Park Service, explores the site of the Gentry Hotel. The significance of the the town has changed over the years, he said. “The lessons that people seem to be drawing from it have less to do with matters of faith and ‘grow where you’re planted,’ and more with a cautionary kind of thing about what happens when we’re not responsible stewards of water.”

Dry Town, Dry Future

You need to upgrade your Flash Player

Lost and found

You need to upgrade your Flash Player
Locating St. Thomas in relation to Lake Mead and Las Vegas.

Locating St. Thomas in relation to Lake Mead and Las Vegas.

A look at Lake Mead's water levels since 1935.

A look at Lake Mead's water levels since 1935.

Water gave birth to the town, and then buried it.

Now years of drought combined with the thirst of a burgeoning Las Vegas Valley have forced Lake Mead to give up all of St. Thomas’ silted remains.

A historian documenting the old Mormon settlement for the National Park Service visited its ruins for the first time Feb. 27 amid a growing belief that St. Thomas may never be covered by water again.

A recent study by the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in San Diego found that Lake Mead, which supplies 90 percent of Las Vegas’ drinking water and water for all other uses throughout the Southwest, could go dry in 13 years. The region’s water officials have, in large part, dismissed the study as overly pessimistic. But they admit that no one knows how long the drought will last or what role climate change will play in the drying of the Southwest.

Whatever the future may hold for St. Thomas, one thing is clear: The ghost town’s past is a cautionary tale.

Just a few years ago the town was 70 feet under Las Vegas’ supply of fresh drinking water. Although it has peeked above the water before, when the lake was low, never have the ruins of St. Thomas’ concrete foundations, once a popular spot for scuba divers, been so far from the shoreline of the lake that covered them for 65 years.

“What I find interesting about it,” says Aaron McArthur, a UNLV doctoral student who is writing the history of St. Thomas for the National Park Service, “is that in 1945, in 1963, the times it emerged from the water before, there were always reunions here. Reunions in the real sense that, ‘We might have been pushed out, but this is our home.’ ”

“Now most of the people are dead ... Now the lessons that people seem to be drawing from it have less to do with matters of faith and ‘grow where you’re planted,’ and more with a cautionary kind of thing about what happens when we’re not responsible stewards of water.”

McArthur, a Mormon originally from Montana, said St. Thomas teaches that lesson, but also others about family and faith.

As McArthur took his first walk through the town’s remnants last week, he said, “Sometimes I think I understand some of it, but then I didn’t live here when there was no running water and no air conditioning.”

Later that night McArthur would shower in his temperature-controlled condo near UNLV, in the middle of one of the nation’s fastest-growing metropolitan areas.

• • •

The Mormons sent to the scorching valley had settled in 1865 at the confluence of the Virgin and Muddy rivers. They referred to them as rivers, but they might have more rightly been called streams or even creeks. After the Mormons had traveled for weeks in wagons across an unforgiving desert, perhaps those trickles of water, constant through both winter and summer, looked like rivers to them.

Walking through the now bone-dry ruins of St. Thomas, it is possible to imagine girls in gingham dresses kicking up dust while running past the Gentry Hotel. Its curved facade and second-story balcony made it one of the town’s most recognizable buildings.

Clear away the water-sucking, invasive tamarisk plants that choke what was once a dirt highway and picture the rows of cottonwood trees the settlers planted for shade along that highway through town. You can still see the path the road took across the hard-packed earth.

Listen hard and you can nearly hear the school bell ringing or the town’s first radio playing on the steps of the car repair shop while bachelors jawed over the day’s news. Hugh Lord, who owned the garage, refused to leave until the waters were lapping at his doorstep.

Walking from cistern to cistern along dirt trails that lead through the ruins of modern-day St. Thomas, it is evident that here water was central to life.

But water is central to life throughout the Southwest, and it was a dam to control the fickle Colorado River and distribute its waters that eventually put St. Thomas at the bottom of a lake. Construction began on Hoover Dam, then called Boulder Dam, in 1931. Giant hydroelectric power generators would pay for the $48 million project, which would regulate the water delivered to Arizona, Nevada, California and Mexico and create a reservoir known as Lake Mead.

Surveys showed that St. Thomas, along with warehouses at Callville and a cluster of farms at Kaolin, would soon be underwater.

There’s nostalgia about St. Thomas in Overton and Logandale, nearby towns where many descendants of the lost town live. Census records show the settlement never topped more than a few hundred people, even before news came that it would be swallowed by the lake.

Logandale resident Verna Heller, 89, was born in St. Thomas. She remembers how hot it was and how she and the other children would roast ears of corn and steal chickens for fun.

Her family left in 1932, six years before the waters covered St. Thomas. She was 14.

The government moved the town’s cemetery — which held the remains of Heller’s twin brother — to Logandale before the waters came.

Heller recalls nightmares of a scene that would be a dream come true for 21st-century Las Vegas: the lake filling all at once.

“It did come up fast when it came up,” she said. “I was too young to have anything but resentment.”

• • •

When the residents of St. Thomas packed their belongings and moved their homes, brick by brick, out of the path of the growing lake, they weren’t the first to take leave of the valley.

Thousands of years before, the Anasazi, an ancient Pueblo people, knew all too well that life in this area was impossible without plenty of water.

Eva Jensen, an archaeologist with the Lost City Museum in Overton, thinks about them every time she turns on her faucet.

“Everybody should think about that,” she says. “Just what is the capacity of the land and the resources that we have?”

Unable to grow crops to feed a population that had grown too fast to support their nearly 1,000 people, the Anasazi abandoned the dry valley about 1150, after living here for 1,000 years.

“The question we should be asking is: How were they able to survive here for as long as they did?” Jensen says. “Our current community hasn’t been here that long, so we haven’t really been tested. We’ll see how we handle this latest drought.”

Jensen, like many Southwest archaeologists and anthropologists, says there are lessons — or at the very least questions — to be taken from the history of Indians who were eventually beaten down by the realities and natural water cycles of desert life.

“Rapid growth anywhere is a stress on a population. We ... have always used our technology to take care of our problems, but there probably reaches a point where technology can’t fix everything,” she says. “We have to think about changing our philosophy of what we should be doing with the land and how rapidly we can grow.

“That question has been faced by populations throughout the world, throughout time.”

Conservationists and archaeologists alike predict that our relatively young Las Vegas civilization could eventually face many of the same hardships the Anasazi did if urban sprawl and reckless water use continue.

“We have to consider the lessons of the past, and think about what it takes to be a sustainable community,” said Launce Rake, spokesman for the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, a group that advocates water conservation. “It remains to be seen if we can overcome our self-destructive impulses when it comes to living in the Southwest.”

Discussion: 5 comments so far…

  1. Gloom and Doom and now Ghosts ...

    The Bureau of Reclamation and the Southern Nevada Water Authority have made their decisions to DIE ( Deny, Ignore & Evade) rather than investigate a NEW SOURCE solution that will yield the ONE MILLION acre feet a year that is needed to keep Lake Mead full.

    Five years of denial mode has cost Lake Mead 5,000,000 acre feet. Denial for another 13 years will amount to a total of 18,000,000 acre feet in storage rather than the predicted "dry Lake Mead".

    Lake Mead may eventually "go dry". What has dried up is the pioneer spirit of St. Thomas to work with Mother Nature to do the impossible....which takes a little longer than the wringing of hands and proclaiming, "woe is me".

    Ray Walker (Retired Water Rights Analyst) waterrdw@yahoo.com

    Development of the NEW SOURCE will not harm the environment or the water rights of anyone, anywhere! As a bonus, Ms. Quagga mussel will not affect delivery of water from the NEW SOURCE.

  2. You might want to check your "facts" a little better. The St. Thomas cemetery was moved to a hill just outside of Overton, not Logandale.

    My mother-in-law was born and raised in St. Thomas and always hated the dam for taking away her home. She is now buried in the St. Thomas cemetery along with many of her siblings and friends from there.

  3. Thank you for you article, bring attention to the past history of our area . We went to the St. Thomas site in the 1970's when the lake was low. It was a ghostly site. I was so sad when they covered up the Salt Mine. When I was little, I thought that the salt pillars depicted the story of SODUM AND GUMORAH. Many dear friends were born there, and my Mother and Father spent time and worked there during the construction of the Dam. Great article. Thanks for the slide show.

  4. I feel that we Las Vegas is being fed propaganda regarding actual water usage and the causes of the Lake's declining water levels. The article tries to tie the growth of Las Vegas with the Lakes decline. This is incorrect, and Las Vegas water usage shows that the City is actually much more efficient in water usage compared to ten or twenty years ago despite our rapidly growing city. So this attempt to tie our rapid growth and the Lakes water level is false. Secondly, although Las Vegas does rely on 90% of its water supply from the Lake, the majority of the water is sent downstream to other states such as Arizona and California for Agricultural uses. So in reality, Las Vegas probably uses less than 10% of the Colorado's flow.

    The Lake is continuing to decline because it is a man made lake, that is tied to a massive hydro powerplant. Again, the majority of this power is sent elsewhere for their power needs. Our nations power consumption has grown, so the hydro plant must continue to be fed massive flows of water despite it using more water and is actually replenishing the dam. So in reality, if Las Vegas and its more efficient water usage was taken into consideration, the Lake might have kept its current levels if we didn't have to keep the gates open to run the power plants.

    The normal twenty and thrity year weather patterns are probably the second significant cause for the Lakes decline. If you examine past Lake levels, one can clearly see that Lake levels have receded and expanded due to snow fall in the mountains when Las Vegas was still a very small town, and the other major cities like Phoenix were still minor as well. Any kid that grew up close to a river or creek can tell you that sometimes, creeks just dry up sometimes when there isn't enough snow melt or rain.

    So please, quit trying to feed this line that our cities growth has contributed to the lakes decline. The reality is this, Lake levels fall and rise depending on weather patterns that have been established on this continent for thousands of years. Should the govt have planned better and anticipated diminishing snow melt in the mountains, and planned to cut back on power generated by the dam and restrict water usage downstream by the farmers?, probably yes but this would have required real discussion and agreement with politicians across state lines. This would have never happened. Instead, we have to read articles like this trying to spell doom and gloom of Las Vegas. Only when you stop talking about left leaning hype that only is meant to promote some GREEN initiative can you really address falling lake levels if that is really what really want to do as a collective society. I support conservation, but not at the cost of reality and the truth.

  5. Thank you LV Sun. This is great reporting. The article and video are interesting and informative, connecting our present situation with a fascinating glimpse of the past.

    Las Vegas has clearly exceeded its carrying capacity, as humanity has done on a global scale. Whether the water is used by us or by others is moot. There is a drought and we must face up to it.

    The Mojave Desert is in charge here. We must live here on its terms or face the consequences.

    Nature bats last.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Full comments policy.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

OR Create an account (It's free)

  • Most Read
  • Discussed
  • Editors’ Picks