Las Vegas Sun

April 26, 2015

Currently: 62° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

j. patrick coolican:

Energy Secretary Chu delivers powerful history lesson


Justin M. Bowen

U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu speaks at a press conference announcing the first-ever hybrid geothermal-solar power plant during the National Clean Energy Summit on Tuesday, Aug. 30, 2011, at the Aria Convention Center.

Click to enlarge photo

J. Patrick Coolican

Clean Energy Summit 4.0

ENN Group chairman Yusuo Wang, speaks during the National Clean Energy Summit Tuesday, August 30, 2011 at the Aria Convention Center. Launch slideshow »

Steven Chu is energy secretary, but maybe he should be crafting the message for Democrats instead.

Chu is a Nobel Prize-winning physicist, but at the National Clean Energy Summit at Aria on Tuesday, Chu played historian, and it was a refreshing message.

Chu said that in the midst of big, immediate challenges, America has taken the long view, making key public investments that fueled future prosperity and progress.

During the darkness of the Civil War, the Union made huge public investments that pushed America forward.

In 1862, the Land Grant College Act passed, which gave states federal land to develop universities that expanded teaching and research in agriculture and the mechanical arts. Iowa State was the first, but Ohio State, Cal-Berkeley, Cornell and MIT followed.

Need I bother saying what those institutions have given us? Just to start, as Chu noted, our corn production has increased eightfold per acre thanks to the agricultural research at those universities.

Then there was the Pacific Railway Act of 1862, which gave generous public financing to the Union Pacific and Central Pacific railroads. That in turn gave us the transcontinental railroad.

And finally, during the Civil War, Congress created the National Academy of Sciences as an advisory panel to the government on scientific issues. (Contrast: Texas Republican Gov. Rick Perry has a novel theory: Global warming is a conspiracy of climate scientists who are greedy for grant money.)

Chu continued his history lesson, noting that without government, many of our favorite modern consumer products and experiences simply wouldn’t exist. After the Wright brothers invented the airplane, our air travel innovation stalled, falling behind Germany, France and England, until we expanded military spending on air power and got the Post Office to use private air carriers to carry mail, which bolstered demand and thus investment.

The same was true of semiconductors, an industry that never would have gotten off the ground without a push from the defense and space sectors, i.e., government.

After the Soviets launched Sputnik, Chu quipped, “We realized their German rocket scientists were better than our German rocket scientists.” So President Dwight Eisenhower created programs, not just to catch up in the short term, but to innovate over decades. One such program was the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which eventually developed the Internet.

Chu’s broader point was that despite the difficult budget environment, now is no time to pull back from investments in clean energy just as those technologies get a foothold in the market, and just as the need to wean ourselves from foreign oil becomes more obvious every day. (Traditional sources of energy have been receiving government help for decades, by the way.)

I’m not sure why it takes a physicist like Chu to make a cogent political argument that Democrats never seem to make. Instead, they cower or say nothing in the face of the Tea Party’s mythical American history in which — contrary to all evidence — government has played little or no role in making America prosperous and powerful.

Chu for president.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Physics is actually the study of reality. Reality includes mathematics, history, medicine, biology and everything else that cannot be changed by a vote of consensus. Reality is the same in India as it is in every other part of the Universe, which is why the electron mass has the same value anywhere when virtue, morals and ethics do not.

    Chu just has to look at reality to understand what he is dealing with. It may not be truth, because truth can be understood from different points of view. Reality however, is determined by nature, not science and thus remains the same whether it is understood or not.

    Chu is the real conservative: he would rather be correct and be the last person to speak then the first one to the podium with an attention getting idea. He's the best DOE Secretary we have had in decades because he understands just a very, very miniscule part of the real world, but that is all he needs to reach the next level.

  2. Well Sgt Crock If you could write something more interesting maybe someone would read that rag you work for. So since your simple mind cannot connect the dots let me help . Every new source of power will replace a small amount of oil. Eventually as enough new sources of power come on line . Oil consumption will be reduced . As you poo poo anything other than drill you prove your bias . So the question becomes is your bias generated by money or ignorance ?