Las Vegas Sun

May 5, 2015

Currently: 82° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Damon Political Report

Democrats tear into Sandoval’s proposed budget

Sandoval's State of the State

Gov. Brian Sandoval, center, leads a standing ovation for a pair of Nevada servicemen who were decorated for their actions in Afghanistan, while making his first State of the State address before a joint session of the Nevada Legislature in Carson City on Monday, Jan. 24, 2011. Lt. Col Tony Millican, who is stationed at Nellis Air Force Base, received the Bronze Star and the Air Force's Lance P. Sijan Award for heroism. Spl. Ernesto Padilla, of the Nevada National Guard received the Purple Heart for wounds he suffered from a road side blast that tore his vehicle in half. Launch slideshow »

The budget Gov. Brian Sandoval presented to the Legislature this week relies on about $1 billion in new revenue, patched together mostly from local governments and school districts.

But he also proposed monetizing $190 million of the state’s insurance premium tax. That essentially means borrowing from future revenue. The state receives a lump sum of $190 million and must pay it off over the next four years.

The cost of doing that: $24 million in interest.

Over the years, Republicans have come up with a variety of monetization and securitization schemes. They’ve looked at the tobacco settlement funds and unclaimed property funds. Each time, Democrats reject the idea.

In a budget hearing this morning, the familiar refrain was sounded over the monetization plan.

“This is like taking out a second on my house to pay my bills,” Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford said. “I think a lot of families that have done that have seen the consequences of that approach. It’s put people in bankruptcy. How is that proposal by the administration any different?”

Budget director Andrew Clinger said the monetization plan was not Sandoval’s “first choice.”

“But given the difficult choices that we face, some of the cuts we were originally on the table for, this is something we felt was necessary to try and protect services while trying to protect the economy at the same time,” he said.

Clinger said the revenue is necessary to offset some of the more severe cuts to services for the needy, disabled and elderly and to avoid a tax increase.

Horsford questioned the wisdom of requiring future Legislatures to find the money for the $54 million annual payment to pay off the note.

“It is a tax on our kids that are going to have to pay this in a future session,” he said.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. "It is a tax on our kids that are going to have to pay this in a future session," he said.

    Horsford is right. Sandoval is mortgaging our children's future, which after his cuts to education, don't look all that bright anyway.

  2. Mr. Sandoval did not come up with any "new money". He is taking money from local governments to pay the states bills. He is also wanting to saddle the state with more debt to be paid in the future, once he is out of office.

    Gaming already pays over half the bills for this state, along with employing most of the people. You can not keep looking for them to pay your way in life.

    It is time for this elected official to step up and make the hard decisions. Services will have to be cut. Government payroll will have to get in line with the private sector and other states. The golden days are not here and you can not keep paying golden wages and benefits.

    Does he have what it takes to FIX THIS PROBLEM or just cover it up and leave it for the future?

  3. A bland Laundry list, where are the jobs Brian? Why don't you give up your taxpayer paid for medical insurance and buy something in the "private sector" yourself, like many Nevadans have to do?

  4. Senator Horsford, I'm glad you're worried about taxing the children to pay for our current expenses. Where do you stand on replacing PERS with a defined contribution plan again?

  5. Several have suggested the people are willing to pay higher taxes to support schools.

    I suggest we ask parents of students to voluntily support the school system. Parents would be asked to donate to the school that their student attends a monthly amount to cover the shortfall. I'm estimating this to be $30.00 per month per student.

    This will get parents interested and invested in there kids education. The value of a quality education far exceeds the $30 cost.