Las Vegas Sun

July 7, 2015

Currently: 78° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Rural Nevada vs. Las Vegas: Battle over water advances

CARSON CITY — Plans to build a 263-mile pipeline to siphon millions of gallons of water a year from rural Nevada to Las Vegas have drawn protests from a diverse group that includes the Mormon church and the Goshute Indians.

The pumping would lead to streams and springs drying up and existing water rights being damaged, according to pre-filed testimony of the Great Basin Water Network, which represents more than 200 individuals and groups.

But the Las Vegas Valley Water District says there is sufficient water in the four valleys, and pumping water wouldn’t damage White Pine or Lincoln counties. The district says that despite major conservation efforts, it needs additional water to handle future growth.

Several parties filed prehearing testimony Friday with the state engineer’s office, which will begin hearings Sept. 26 on the Water District’s application to draw up to 126,000 acre-feet. An acre-foot equals nearly 326,000 gallons, enough water to supply a family of four for a year.

The latest estimates put the cost of the project at $3.5 billion.

Jeremy Aguero, of Applied Analysis, said a water shortage in the Las Vegas area “would severely undermine the region’s ability to attract new industries, organizations and residents or garner additional investment by existing business.”

The resort industry is dependent on water for use by guests and in swimming pools, golf courses and landscaping. A shortage of water could lead to a 1 percent decline in tourists and cost the gaming industry $163 million in net revenue annually, Aguero said in his testimony.

John Bredehoeft, a hydrologist hired by the Great Basin Network, said the pumping would deplete the water storage in eastern Nevada, adding that the region wouldn’t be able to recover.

“Large drawdowns will be created over very large areas: streams, springs and (deep-rooted plants) will be eliminated and wells will go dry,” he said in his testimony.

The Water District says the Colorado River supplies 90 percent of Southern Nevada’s water and will continue to experience serious drought conditions.

As part of a conservation program, the Water District said it reduced annual consumption by nearly 21 billion gallons from 2002 to 2008 despite a population increase of 400,000 during that period.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints owns a large area of private property, grazing permits and a multitude of water rights in north Spring Valley. The church said it is protesting because it fears the groundwater pumping could hurt water sources that are crucial to livestock operation.

The Goshute Indians worry about the accessibility of cattle to streams, ponds and spring sources.

The Bureau of Land Management filed its draft environmental impact report last month, saying the project would disturb 12,300 acres during construction, but 11,300 would be reclaimed.

The project would alter the ranges or habitats of antelope, elk, mule deer, desert bighorn sheep, desert tortoises, pygmy rabbits, the western burrowing owl, bald eagles, golden eagles, the dark kangaroo mouse, the Gila monster and the Mojave poppy bee.

The BLM said there would be short-term interference with hunting access.

Although construction is outside Great Basin National Park, it could also be affected, the federal agency said.

The BLM stressed it wanted public comment on the draft report so it can write a final environmental statement.

The Water District wants to pump 91,220 acre-feet a year from Spring Valley and 34,750 from the Cave, Dry Lake and Delamar valleys.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Cy, what you ignore in your article are the impacts from the pumping versus as opposed to the construction impacts in the pipeline right-of-way.

    A careful reading of the DEIS would reveal impacts such as the loss of over 8000 acres of wetlands, 305 springs and 193 miles of streams, loss of 192,000 acres of sage brush and other vegetation invaluable as habitat for mule deer, pronghorn antelope, sage grouse and elk, and the generation of 34,742 TONS of windblown dust PER YEAR, containing radioactive materials deposited downwind from the nuclear testing as well as heavy metals that impact human health such as asbestos, zinc, cadmium and selenium. Not to mention the likely extinction of several species of desert fish and spring snails.

    Cy, I urge you to get better acquainted with your subject material before reporting rather than relying on the SNWA propaganda machine.

  2. "lindaj" is correct as well - the soil borne disease is a fungus known as "valley fever" and is potentially fatal.