Las Vegas Sun

July 2, 2015

Currently: 88° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Census study finds Nevada lagging in K-12 spending

Updated Tuesday, June 7, 2011 | 2:32 p.m.

Click to enlarge photo

Keith Rheault

Nevada ranks 45th in the nation in K-12 education spending per pupil, according to an analysis released last month by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Nevada school districts spent an average of $8,422 per student during the 2008-09 school year, according to the 2009 Annual Survey of Local Government Finances — School Systems. The U.S. average was $10,499 per pupil.

The financial survey collected public and charter school data from state education departments, including Washington, D.C. The data include education revenue from federal, state and local sources; instructional operation and spending figures; and capital spending numbers from the fiscal year 2009, the most recent data available.

New York led the nation in education spending at $18,126 per student, according to the census report. Washington, D.C., $16,408; New Jersey, $16,271; Arkansas, $15,552; and Vermont, $15,175, rounded out the top five.

Nevada ranked seventh from the bottom. Utah spent the least at $6,356 per student. Idaho, $7,092; Arizona, $7,813; Oklahoma, $7,855; and Tennessee, $7,897, rounded out the bottom five states.

Nevada’s general education expenditure in 2009 was $4.10 billion, up slightly from $4.07 billion in 2008. The majority of the state education expenditures is for the Clark County School District, which spent $3.3 billion in 2009. The bulk of the state and district spending went to salary and wages.

Keith Rheault, superintendent of public instruction, said the low spending ranking did not surprise him. Historically, Nevada has ranked near the bottom in both education spending and academic achievement, he said.

“You get what you pay for,” Rheault said. “Our federal funding was always lower than what we should have been getting even though we knew we had a lot more students than the 2000 census. I welcome the census because now we can account for the new students we have in the state.”

The Nevada Policy Research Institute, a conservative think tank, has also analyzed the state’s education spending and has come up with similar figures, communications director Victor Joecks said. However, more education spending doesn’t necessarily mean better academic performance, he said.

“The emphasis on funding distracts from what the goal should be: student achievement,” Joecks said. “There’s very little correlation between spending and student achievement.”

The institute's analysis found that per-pupil Spending in Nevada, adjusted for inflation, has nearly tripled in the past 50 years with no corresponding gain in student achievement, Joecks said.

“When you hear talk about having 30 to 40 kids in a classroom, where is that money going?” Joecks said. “Each of those students represents a significant investment by Nevada taxpayers and we aren’t getting our return on investment.”

According to the census report, Nevada ranks 32nd in the nation for education revenue from federal sources. However, Rheault notes that federal funding accounts for the smallest portion of the state’s education revenue.

In 2009, about $425 million — less than 10 percent of the state’s education revenue — came from federal funds, according to the report. The bulk of the revenue came from the state sources $2.2 billion, 51 percent and local sources $1.7 billion, 39 percent.

The census survey was conducted from January 2010 to March 2010, and the data were processed from March 2010to April 2011.

The Nevada Legislature approved Assembly Bill 579 last weekend authorizing $2.1 billion in state education funding for the next biennium. Currently, annual state funding for education totals $5,192 per student. That number would increase to $5,263 by the fall and to $5,374 by 2012.

It’s higher than Gov. Brian Sandoval’s proposed budget, which was about $4,900 per student, Rheault said.

“It was welcomed to get that extra funding in the final bill,” he said.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. No, when it comes to "education," you do not get what you pay for. The public school system is broken and has been for decades. It's a bottomless pit that simply does a horrible job and should be dismantled in favor of private schools. Parents should be given vouchers so they have the ability to choose the school that will be of most benefit to their children. Get the bureaucratic drones out of the school business and put the power back in the hands of parents!

  2. When the Superintendent has a problem with the transparency of school district's budget, there is obviously a problem !!

    There is not any accountability for graduation rates or spending. Rediculous !

  3. regurgitating that nonsense make him sound like the teacher from Charlie Brown.

    If you look at other countries, they're kicking our butts in education. This is the land of opportunity. We can all agree accountability needs to be there, but the opportunity to rise above your class also needs to be there.

  4. No amount of funding is adequate if it is not spent wisely.

    No doubt wages and salaries will make up a large portion of the budget, but budgets should start with fully funding the basics like books and supplies before addressing payroll. Even then, pay for teachers should be funded before looking at administrators and support staff.

    Get the priorities right before asking for more money when there is little to start with.