Las Vegas Sun

May 4, 2015

Currently: 75° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

School District: Restructuring of 5 schools in best interest of students


Justin M. Bowen

Students rally outside Chaparral High School on Wednesday, March 9, 2011, in protest of the district’s plans to reorganize the school.

Click to enlarge photo

Superintendent Dwight Jones speaks with the media with School Board President Carolyn Edwards about the district's School Improvement Grant application.

Chaparral High School Rally

Students rally outside Chaparral High School on Wednesday, March 9, 2011, in protest of the district's plans to reorganize the school. Launch slideshow »

The announcement that the Clark County School District wants to reorganize five low-performing schools and make staff reapply for their jobs brought anger from students, but district officials insisted Friday they are acting in the students’ best interests.

“We know that some are feeling uneasy about the change,” Superintendent Dwight Jones said during a Friday news conference. “We know that change is always hard, but we also know that it’s necessary, that students matter most, that we’ve got to take the necessary steps to ensure that kids get better results.”

The district said Wednesday that it was applying for a School Improvement Grant for Chaparral, Mojave and Western high schools, and Elizondo and Hancock elementary schools.

The grant is part of a federal program that awarded funds to eight states, including Nevada, with the goal of improving schools. Nevada received $9.4 million. The Clark County School District is asking for money to perform a “turnaround” program on the five schools beginning in the fall.

How much of the funding the district will receive won’t be known until the state Department of Education announces the awards in May.

Jones said the five schools have been low-performing for at least five years and the changes are past due.

Under the plan, school staff members must reapply for their positions and a maximum of 50 percent can be rehired. The rest of the staff will be shifted to other schools in the district.

In addition, principals at the schools who have been in their positions for more than three years will be replaced, leaving only Western and Hancock with the same principals next year.

The schools would then get extra money to reduce class sizes, offer longer school days or for other programs.

District officials emphasized that no one is being fired or laid off through the program, although layoffs remains a possibility depending on the state budget.

“This is not about the adults in our system, this is about the children and our children being successful,” School Board President Carolyn Edwards said.

The board members support Jones’ plan, Edwards said; “I share in his belief that this is the right thing to do and I applaud him for his courage to move forward in this way.”

The plan prompted protests Wednesday and Thursday from students at Chaparral High School, where some students say they don’t want to lose their principal.

Critics of the district's plan argue that it unfairly places blame on teachers instead of students, while some students worried that classmates might leave school if their favorite teachers were let go.

District officials said they have to replace school staff this way because of grant requirements from the federal government. They said students would benefit from the change.

“This is certainly not an attack on the school, but rather it’s a commitment to their success and we have got to be committed to getting better results,” Jones said.

The money also comes at a welcome time as other programs end and the state budget remains in question, officials said.

Chaparral, for example, is expected to lose as much as $2 million next year as funding for current programs expires, said Lauren Kohut-Rost, the district’s deputy superintendent of instruction. If the new grant is awarded, the school will have money to make up for those cuts.

Part of the intent is also to give schools a fresh start, where the staff has the “opportunity to hit the ground running as one cohesive unit,” Kohut-Rost said. “That’s the excitement of a new school.”

Hancock Principal Jerre Moore, who will stay next year, said she has been talking to parents who are worried about the changes.

“Any time you talk about change it’s different and you just have to keep reassuring them that a fresh look at things is OK and we’re here to make sure that these children are learning,” she said. “You’re just looking at things with a fresh set of eyes, and that’s OK when you mix things up.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. This is a "shotgun" approach. Anyone who has experience as a service tech knows what I mean.

    Get rid of social promotion, make principals accountable to parents, and find a way to implement merit pay for teachers based upon objective standards and not just test scores. Beyond that, school staff *must* find a way to get a message out to our children that they should want to learn.

    K-12 is very different today than it was when I attended in the late 50s - early 60s. It is also much worse, in my opinion. Bring back competitive advantage, it would do wonders, even among the problem kids. Can you imagine how much respect a gang-leader would retain if he was the only one who failed to advance among his followers?