Las Vegas Sun

May 6, 2015

Currently: 69° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Brothel industry falls short in desire to pay state taxes

Proposal led by Democrats to tax services appears dead this session

Sun Coverage

CARSON CITY — After decades of pleading, Nevada’s legal brothel industry was about to get its wish of paying taxes, giving prostitution the legitimacy that comes with contributing to the state’s bank account.

But new taxes proposed by Democrats appear to be dead, or at least on life support, and so too the chance for the state to tax the willing and able brothel industry.

Nevada is the only state with legal prostitution, but it has a somewhat awkward relationship with its industry.

For one thing, it’s illegal in Washoe and Clark counties, home to Reno and Las Vegas.

Second, lawmakers have been bashful about bringing “that money” into the mix to pay for things such as schools, universities and social services.

The reasons are understandable. Anytime prostitution is brought up, it attracts a media frenzy drowning out the serious work they’re doing. Also, some politicians have said, the brothel money would somehow stain the good, clean dollars used to pay for schools and safety net (from the wholesome casino and construction industries).

As people move in and the political environment shifts, the industry views itself as vulnerable. No less than Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid used his address to the Legislature this year to call for outlawing brothels.

So the industry, at least since the 1990s, has volunteered to pay into the state’s tax coffers. If the brothels pay money to the state, the thinking goes, it’s one more reason that lawmakers won’t ban prostitution.

(The industry pays money to counties, tens of thousands of dollars, in privileged business license fees.)

In 2009, former state Sen. Bob Coffin, now running for Las Vegas City Council, proposed a $5 per transaction tax for legal acts of prostitution. But it died, with legislative leadership not wanting to deal with a potentially controversial distraction in a pressure-cooked Legislature.

“That’s the closest we got,” said George Flint, longtime lobbyist for the brothel industry.

(In 2003, when lawmakers were discussing a live entertainment tax, Flint said the industry agreed to a 10 percent entrance fee, but was rebuffed.)

So fast-forward to 2011. Under two proposed taxes, a “margin tax” and a sales tax on services, the state would get some general fund dollars from the state’s bordellos, other than $200 it gets from them filing for a business license.

Democratic leadership has proposed the margin tax, based on a company’s adjusted gross revenue, but that appears dead or dying, sources conceded.

Flint said only three operations would meet the threshold of $1 million a year in business.

A sales tax on services would be the first tax on “the act of prostitution,” Flint said. Currently, the sales tax is only collected on the sale or use of tangible goods, such as a Big Mac, and not on things such as haircuts.

A Democratic source said the brothel industry would indeed be included in the sales tax on services, which would be 1 percent under the current proposal. Leadership began with a broad definition of what to tax, and then exempted certain services, such as health care or child care, that were deemed essential.

Flint said the industry, despite struggling in the recession, supports being taxed.

(He noted that brothels pay sales tax on food and drinks they serve, as well as other things. “We actually sell a lot of souvenirs,” he said.)

But the real money, Flint said, comes if the Legislature ever decides to legalize and regulate prostitution in Clark County. If 1,000 women got work cards for four “dates” a day and charged $500 a date (almost half of the average rate at a Pahrump brothel, Flint said) it would generate $7.3 billion in annual economic activity.

Figuring a 40/40/20 split among the worker, the owner of the operation, and the government entity, Flint said it could generate $146 million a year.

“I haven’t been showing this around too much,” Flint said of the estimates. “At some point, I figure they’ll realize they have a budget problem and come ask.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 7 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Better to bring it back to Clark County & tax it! And it keeps the ladies safe, while they get STD checkups once a month.


    Only in NEVADA, USA.
    I swear to God, there is not a LICK of cents...

  3. So if i read this correctly the oly way we can tax prostitution is if we raise taxes on everyone else too. yea seems like kind of a puff piece as a general tax on service would also cover prostitution not just a singular tax.

  4. "Nevada is the only state with legal prostitution, but it has a somewhat awkward relationship with its industry."

    The REAL problem is the states' presumption it can criminalize what consenting adults do in private. All that really happened here was a sort of begrudging acceptance and, like all commerce, it was organized along traditional business models.

    This state's hypocrisy is naked for all -- despite all the shouting about the budget, here's an entire industry asking permission to "pay their fair share" and Carson City turned it down again.

    "If you want to dramatize the evils of prostitution, corrupt a virgin, not a whore." -- Blake Edwards, director and screenwriter (1981)

  5. No surprise that Sierra Harry is in this article. The liberal voters, mainly in Clark County, made a gigantic blunder by re-electing this dude.

    To some of us, it sounds silly that tax dollars from brothels would be "dirty" while dollars from gambling are "clean". Sin is sin, right? Nobody is forced to gamble or go to brothels. Since they are CHOSEN "sins", what difference is there in tax money from either? How about taxes on tobacco and booze? Are those dollars "clean" too?

    Sometimes, politicians act just plain silly.

  6. Next election cycle is really simple - if it has "Incumbent" next to their name I sure as heck wont be voting for them.

  7. Richard, part of your post is correct,...and in this matter politicians and government are simply screwed up. Money is money and if the ranches want to pay it,...take it, in reality nobody cares,...well with the exception of a few misguided holy rollers.

    As for the wrong part,...the libral Harry Reid comment. I'm 110% against his stance on prostitution in Nevada,...he's out to lunch on this issue and many others,...but if you remember he was running against an imbecile,...the lesser of two evils won.