Las Vegas Sun

May 3, 2015

Currently: 77° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

School District issues memo to quell fears about outsourcing

School district in talks over outsourcing

KSNV coverage of the Clark County School District considering plans to outsource support staff jobs, Oct. 20, 2011.

Clark County Schools Superintendent Dwight Jones released a memo on Thursday to reassure employees that the School District is not currently exploring privatization of custodial and transportation positions.

The memo – titled “Misinformation on Outsourcing” – comes three days after the School Board considered establishing a policy on outsourcing as a measure of “last resort.” Currently, the School District has no formal privatization policy, although some food service and maintenance staff positions have been outsourced in the past.

The recent controversy over privatization stems from the Gibson Report, a privately funded study released in September that reviewed the district’s academic performance and operational services.

The study recommended that the School District look into hiring outside custodians and bus drivers to cut operational costs. The study has “devastated” the district’s support staff union, which represents custodial and transportation staff, said union president John Carr.

“The morale in the support staff and teaching staff isn’t zero — I wish I could get it up to zero,” Carr said, addressing the School Board on Thursday night. “Their biggest fear is when are you going to drop the bomb? The scare is real.”

Jones’ memo reminded employees the report’s recommendations are “not directives” and that “the study recommends (outsourcing) only as a last resort.”

“That means I will consider each and every recommendation and may choose a few to implement; it does not mean they automatically go into effect,” Jones said in the memo.

The School District and its support staff union are currently in contract negotiations. The district has been seeking $56 million in concessions from its four employee unions to balance its budget.

In his memo, Jones said privatization is not being discussed in negotiations or internally, but “only sources outside of the District are pushing this issue and the misinformation that is surrounding it.”

Support staff attending Thursday night’s School Board meeting said they weren’t convinced their jobs wouldn’t be outsourced. About 10 union members addressed the School Board, imploring them to tread carefully around the issue of privatization.

A couple of them pointed to examples of privatization efforts that didn’t work out. Others raised a safety issue with background checks although the district said they plan to enforce them for outside firms working in schools. One union member said the Gibson Report “sounds like union busting.”

Instead of asking support staff and teachers for concessions, Carr said the School District should consider cutting administrator pay and stop hiring consultants.

“I appreciate the memo that went out to employees this morning,” he said. “But if we are really concerned about ‘Ready By Exit’ and the quality of education, why won’t we look at the top of the chain?”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Well, they should be looking seriously at "outsourcing." Any prudent businessman or woman, responsible for the health of his or her company, would be doing so. Just because it's taxpayer money being spent does not mean it should be okay to pay more and get less. Oh, wait, how about the extra $50 million our "esteemed" representatives are eager to throw away to pay off their cronies in awarding a new bus contract or the extra millions thrown to construction companies high on politicians "A" lists? Even after Kenny, Herrera, etal, went to prison, in-your-face poltical corruption is still rampant in NV politics!

  2. It appears as if their is some speaking out of both sides of the mouth here, "That means I will consider each and every recommendation and may choose a few to implement; it does not mean they automatically go into effect," Jones said in the memo."

    "[A]nd may choose a few to implemement;" is a statement claiming the potential of doing so. This is double speak going on.

    It is liken to either you are pregnant or not. A person cannot be both!

    IF a citizen or parent were to come to a school site and see the layers of security involved for the protection of the children, they would better understand why those district support staff are essential. They are a stable part of the school's landscape and culture, the extra eyes and ears, helping maintain security, and for the care and welfare of the students. They are another trusted soul these children can turn to when there is a problem.

    Many schools within the district lack the support of parent involvement through the PTA or volunteering. This is neighborhood specific where folks know of each other and are there as free support. So this situation makes the use of district support staff even more essential.

    Public schools are a part of the government. They are NOT a part of the capitalistic free market, and should not be fully treated as a private "company." Public schools CAN NOT turn away anyone, where a private business may. There are many good business practices that the educational industry employs to run efficiently, but ULTIMATELY schools must protect and serve the children. It is LAW. Companies are NOT bound by such law.
    Thank you.