Las Vegas Sun

May 4, 2015

Currently: 75° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


Berkley calls for passage of ‘meaningful’ gun legislation

Shelley Berkley

Shelley Berkley

Democratic Rep. Shelley Berkley today became the first Nevada lawmaker on Capitol Hill to call for a congressional conversation on gun control.

“Congress should answer the challenge issued by President Obama and work together to pass meaningful legislation that balances the right to legally own a firearm with the need to safeguard America’s schools and communities,” Berkley said in a statement released by her office.

On Sunday night, Obama called on Washington to act in the wake of the Newtown, Conn., tragedy in which 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook School were killed by a gunman who also shot his mother before killing himself.

Obama pledged to use “whatever power this office holds to engage my fellow citizens — from law enforcement to mental health professionals to parents and educators — in an effort aimed at preventing more tragedies like this.”

But neither the president nor Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid specifically mentioned gun control or offered specifics. Reid today refused to specify even what gun control measures he thought might be appropriate to address.

Republicans have been even more vague about what they feel Congress ought to do in the wake of the Newtown tragedy, the fourth mass shooting in the last two years and the second-deadliest shooting perpetrated by a single gunman in the U.S.

“We should look to our Constitution for the principles that will help guide us as we search for answers in these increasingly difficult and complicated times,” Sen. Dean Heller said in a statement late Monday.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who demurred on Monday saying, “We can do nothing to lessen their [the Newtown families’] anguish but we can let them know that we mourn with them,” said Tuesday that it will be up to Reid to decide whether to move on gun control.

Until Friday’s tragedy, gun control had largely fallen out of Congress’ consciousness. It has been eight years since the last piece of active gun control legislation — an assault weapons ban — expired.

If anything, in the time since, federal and Supreme Court decisions have ushered in a more expansive reading of gun laws.

One important inhibiting factor has been the watchful eye of the National Rifle Association, a powerful lobby that maintains an unflinchingly pro-gun reading of the Second Amendment, issues annual ratings of lawmakers and contributes handsomely to political campaigns.

Heller has an “A” rating from the NRA, while Reid has a “B.” In the 2010 elections, the NRA funded Reid’s opponent, Sharron Angle.

Berkley received an “F” from the NRA at her last rating. Berkley, who lost a bid for the Senate, won’t be around Congress next year to participate or advance the gun control discussion she is calling for.

But Democrats far more conservative than Berkley have already started to clamor for a similar discussion.

Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia — who has an “A” rating from the NRA and is an avid hunter — told MSNBC on Monday that he thought it was time to discuss laws surrounding guns, especially high-capacity firearms.

On Tuesday, incoming Sens. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Joe Donnelly of Indiana told the Washington Post they would also be open to discussion on gun control.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. We need to get control of the media before we start on anything else.

  2. How about applying 2nd amendment rights to CITIZENS? How about real background checks that consider I.D. theft by gun purchasers? How about limiting gun sales to authorized dealers--if you have a gun to resell, you could consign.

  3. How about the right of all people, CITIZENS or NOT, to be safe where ever they go WITHOUT having to carry armament and ammunition to defend themselves?

    It seems that the NRA has interpreted the Constitution to say that the Government is NOT responsible for the safety of the public. The most recent NRA interpretation states that those who desire peace and safety must carry their own weapons or pay a tax to hire private guards...and to hell with those who don't.

    Since when is one 'safe' during the exchange of gunfire? The reason that the presence of guns will always destroy safety is that when they are used, all bystanders and combatants are in danger. The use of a gun in public areas destroys public safety, even if the 'good guys' are firing back.

    Why should any private party be required to take part in running gun battles through malls, movie theaters and over sidewalks to defend themselves? Gun battles between private parties, as the NRA desires, are illegal because it is nearly impossible for police to tell who is who after arriving on the scene.

    Therefore the only truly safe places are a gun free zones and these should be synonymous with all public areas. It's time to make America a place to live safely, not sweat and die.