Las Vegas Sun

July 4, 2015

Currently: 101° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Nevada Supreme Court orders stay of coroner’s inquest

The Nevada Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered Clark County officials not to conduct a coroner’s inquest planned for Thursday — the first such inquest under controversial new procedures more favorable to family members of people killed by police.

The court temporarily stayed the inquest until at least May 11 so that it has more time to review briefs filed by county officials and attorneys for Nevada Highway Patrol officers challenging the new inquest procedures.

Highway Patrol officers, who were present when Eduardo Lopez-Hernandez died in August 2010 after being Tasered, last week asked the court for an emergency injunction to block the inquest proceedings while issues about the legality of the new process are litigated.

“Having reviewed the parties’ filings and supporting documents, we conclude that a temporary stay is warranted to allow for consideration of the motion,” the court wrote in Wednesday’s order halting Thursday’s inquest.

Both sides will now have time to file additional briefs in the case. It’s unclear if there will be further delays beyond May 11.

The Clark County Commission has argued the new procedures are fair to police officers in that the inquest process remains a fact-finding exercise.

Attorneys for the Highway Patrol officers say the process is adversarial, pitting police against family members of people killed and is geared toward finding them guilty of misconduct.

The County Commission in 2010 approved new inquest procedures in which an ombudsman is appointed to represent the family of the person killed by police and key evidence and investigative files will be released.

Those changes were ordered after critics said the old system always favored police.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. From what I can find, there have been about 150 inquests since 1976. Of those only *one* resulted in a finding of criminally negligent. And that single case, when presented to a grand jury, resulted in a refusal to indict.

    While it would be nice to think that METRO is actually that good in their judgement when they use lethal force, we all have our doubts.

    I, for one, think that the old system was used mainly to mitigate damage awards from the ensuing wrongful death civil suits, of which several have been successful.

    We need a system that will once again foster trust in our law enforcement agencies, including the DA's office.