Las Vegas Sun

April 19, 2015

Currently: 70° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Clark County, North Las Vegas approve Sloan Channel settlement


Steve Marcus

Cliff Chapman looks over the back wall of his daughter’s home as treated wastewater from the new City of North Las Vegas Water Reclamation Facility flows down the Sloan channel Thursday, June 23, 2011. The city originally had planned to build a pipeline to transport the treated wastewater to Lake Mead but the city is now releasing treated water into the channel which flows into Lake Mead.

Updated Wednesday, Nov. 7, 2012 | 7:25 p.m.

Clark County commissioners signed off Wednesday morning on settling lawsuits regarding North Las Vegas transporting treated wastewater via the county-owned Sloan Channel.

The North Las Vegas City Council in a meeting Wednesday night unanimously voted to ratify the settlement, meaning residents along the Sloan Channel can look forward to a future without swarms of bugs and the smell of rotting algae.

More than a year ago and without permission from the county, North Las Vegas began to release treated wastewater into the Sloan Channel, which is a floodwater channel that leads to Lake Mead. North Las Vegas had built a $300 million treatment plant, expecting funding from the Clean Water Coalition to build an underground pipeline to transport the wastewater. When the coalition mostly disbanded, so did the pipeline idea. When it did, the city began to release the water into the channel.

Then the city sued in federal court, asking for affirmation that it had the right to release the water into the channel; Clark County countersued in state court.

Residents along the channel complained that the warmed water from the plant created fertile territory for egg-laying insects and promoted algae growth. Bug swarms and a permanent stench, they said, emanated from the channel.

Under terms of the agreement, North Las Vegas will transfer $8 million to the county to design and build a pipeline that follows the path of the Sloan Channel. The county will spend another $7 million, bringing the total cost to $15 million. The city will repay the county the $7 million with a portion if its quarter-cent sales tax distributed by the Southern Nevada Water Authority over the next 10 years.

More terms of the agreement include:

• North Las Vegas will have to perform maintenance on the channel, including “mitigation of odors, algae, midges, mosquitoes, flies, spiders, bats, birds, aquatic insects, pests and/or other nuisances” that result from the discharge.

• The city will pay $109,000 to the county within 30 days for costs resulting from the discharge to date.

• Paying the county $50,000 to secure the city’s maintenance obligations.

• Paying the county an annual $50,000 user fee until the pipeline is finished.

• Paying $1.5 million for future road and other improvements in the area of the wastewater plant.

As part of the agreement, the North Las Vegas City Council on Wednesday voted to dissolve the Clean Water Coalition, which it had not wanted to do previously because of pipeline issues.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. North Las Vegas made a bad decision and now they will have to rectify it.

    It would have been appropriate to work out a plan with Clark County, and Clark Co. should have agreed to work with North Las Vegas.

    This was about money motives gone bad with arrogant actions.