Las Vegas Sun

July 3, 2015

Currently: 108° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

State Budget:

Budget cuts hurt state’s ability to help returning veterans

Parades and praise for veterans last weekend were one thing, but Nevada has struggled to help veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan access federal benefits.

Years of budget cuts have resulted in a two-month wait for veterans to see a state liaison for help with applying for federal education, housing, health care and pension benefits — a delay that the Nevada Office of Veterans Services called “inexcusable,” according to an agency memo written last month.

With more than 100 Nevada veterans on a waiting list to see a veterans services officer, the state “is unable to keep abreast of the needs of Nevada veterans and their families,” Katherine Miller, deputy director of the Nevada Office of Veterans Services, told a legislative committee last month.

Lawmakers approved adding two positions to try to lower the wait time last month. But they also said the current eight-week wait in Las Vegas is the result of a state budget that has been stretched too thin for four years.

In 2011, the Legislature approved Gov. Brian Sandoval’s recommendation to eliminate two veterans services representatives and an administrative assistant position in the agency’s Las Vegas office. The agency’s budget was cut by 7 percent overall, to just over $5 million over the two-year budget period, according to the state appropriations report.

Lawmakers said the inability of the agency to serve returning veterans is what they predicted would happen.

"This is the perfect example of the real-life fallout of budget cuts and how it impacts real people every day,” said Sen. Debbie Smith, D-Sparks.

A 2007 executive branch audit recommended that the state add four veterans services officers as part of a decades-long effort to help Nevada veterans access federal benefits. Each state services officer helps bring in an average of $5.2 million a year in benefits for veterans.

But while the state Legislature approved two positions in Elko County, it did not approve two positions requested in Clark County in 2009.

And again, in 2011, the agency passed on a chance to request funding for more positions.

“It was not reasonable to pursue additional budget positions in 2011,” said Caleb Cage, executive director of the Nevada Office of Veterans Services. “We knew we had to cut positions.”

Cage said that federal backlog to handle claims is about a year.

“Adding an additional eight-week wait to the front end is entirely too long,” Cage said. He added that it “had been that way for months.”

Now, seven veteran services officers in the state, not counting the new positions approved last month, serve an estimated 300,000 veterans living in Nevada.

Sandoval was traveling Wednesday and was not available for comment. Spokeswoman Mary-Sarah Kinner said that Sandoval supported the request for additional positions. But she would not address why his budget in 2011 recommended those cuts.

“The governor is grateful for the service of our veterans and will continue to work to support them as they transition to civilian life,” Kinner said.

The Nevada Office of Veterans Services has, like other government agencies in Nevada, struggled during the recession to keep up with demand for services.

Smith, who was chairwoman of the Assembly Ways and Means Committee in 2011, acknowledged that the Legislature could have added positions.

“(But) at that point, we had no money to add anything back,” she said.

The delay veterans would experience “seemed like an absurdly long time, but if we add that back, do we cut services for kids with autism? We were in the middle of that whole problem. We were hurting people in a variety of areas,” Smith said.

Assemblyman Elliot Anderson, D-Las Vegas, a veteran of the war in Afghanistan, said the cut was unacceptable.

“I’m concerned about people coming home from war who need to be connected to services,” Anderson said.

The cut, he said, “didn't make a lot of sense then. It doesn’t make a lot of sense now.”

The two additional positions approved by the Legislature’s Interim Finance Committee will be included in Sandoval’s budget going forward, according to the state budget director.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. The thing that's troubling about this article is not only what Governor Sandoval cut before, but the fact that he is incommunicado, and only has other people speaking for him.

    This all spells out clearly that Governor Sandoval could care less about the Veterans who call Nevada their home.

    As a Retired U.S. Navy Veteran who calls Nevada his home, I also want to express the same sentiment.

    I could care less about Governor Sandoval.

    He can count on me to vote him out at the earliest opportunity I can.

  2. The trouble with Nevada's budget is that it is over-funding several things including over-funding compensation to City, County, and School District employees. When we right-size compensation, there will be more-than-enough money for the things government SHOULD do. K-12 and the university system have become expert at selling Nevadans on the hype that "education" will attract jobs and a diversified economy. We've dumped literally billions additional into this and have negative results. We need to stop attracting the low life--indigents who drain our social welfare programs AND our schools. Unemployed custodial parents who keep having more kids than they are willing to support. We can turn it around by supporting those who have done--those who have worked for years and years and paid in.

  3. What the article doesn't address is that the VA has a benefits office that works with the vet to apply for these FEDERAL benefits. Add in that the DAV as a non-profit organization also has people that help the vet apply for FEDERAL benefits, why do we need a state organization to help apply for VA benefits.

    I applied directly to the VA for my VA Loan, health care and disability benefits without any problems. Add in that all active duty personnel when they are preparing to leave service goes through a VA benefit class to assist them on applying for VA benefits, the need for the state office to assist with FEDERAL benefits is a "NICE" have, not a "REQUIRED" except for any state unique benefits (which are few and are handled by the Assessors office and DMV).

    As the VA moves to a digital application world, the Vet can apply for benefits on-liine or at a VA Veterans Assistance Office. the need for a third party isn't a need, just a luxury that the state is providing.