Las Vegas Sun

July 31, 2014

Currently: 84° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

OTHER VOICES:

If at first you don’t secede …

Another view?

View more of the Las Vegas Sun's opinion section:

Editorials - the Sun's viewpoint.

Columnists - local and syndicated writers.

Letters to the editor - readers' views.

Have your own opinion? Write a letter to the editor.

What a coincidence. It is intriguing to watch Steven Spielberg’s “Lincoln” biopic about Abraham Lincoln at a time when the current president is receiving secession petitions via the Internet.

I wonder: How far would the 13th Amendment have gotten in today’s age of Twitter and cable TV news-talk shows? Would black folks still be in slavery? Would John Wilkes Booth have skipped Ford’s Theater if he had his own talk show?

The odd parallels between the two eras illustrate Karl Marx’s point about how history repeats itself, “the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce.”

The movie recounts in a bracing and yet thoroughly entertaining fashion how the newly re-elected President Lincoln hunted for votes, one lame-duck congressman at a time. His goal: to end slavery with the 13th Amendment even as the last battles of the Civil War raged on. His means: beg, borrow or buy as many votes as he needs for passage.

To avoid getting his own hands dirty, Lincoln employs a crew of political hacks whom we follow through the often-amusing chores of trading patronage jobs and other “gifts,” to use a famous Mitt Romney word for political offerings.

Since crucial support for the anti-slavery amendment will evaporate if the South surrenders first, we see in scenes of Hitchcock-like suspense Lincoln and his allies pushing for a vote while he secretly stalls the approach of Confederate representatives from Richmond who are seeking to talk peace. In today’s world, one text message from a Virginia rebel could have blown the whole deal.

One can easily imagine how, in today’s fevered political media environment ol’ Honest Abe would be ripped by conservative commentators for his “Illinois-style politics.”

Yet, politics in Illinois, like elsewhere, have more than one style, as illustrated by a story from “Team of Rivals,” Doris Kearns Goodwin’s book on which Spielberg based the movie. One of Lincoln’s most loyal supporters was Joseph Medill, co-owner and managing editor of the Chicago Tribune, where I now work. Medill asked the president why he appointed former opponents like Secretary of State William Henry Seward, who figures prominently in the movie, to top cabinet positions. Lincoln responded that, since the cabinet “needed the strongest men of the party” and “these were the very strongest men.” He added, “I had no right to deprive the country of their services.”

Lincoln’s ability to surround himself with “strong men” yet emerge, as Goodwin notes, “as the strongest of them all” contrasts sharply with today’s deep Washington divide in which such prosaic issues as raising marginal tax rates are fought as epic battles between good and evil.

Such is the heated atmosphere that gives birth to today’s secession fever. It started in Texas, which was the first to reach the 25,000 signatures required for the White House to give a response. The Lone Star State has since gathered more than 100,000.

One of the more eloquent (and printable in family newspaper) expressions of support for secession can be found on Rep. Ron Paul’s website. “Secession is a deeply American principle,” says the outgoing libertarian Republican Texan. “There is nothing treasonous or unpatriotic about wanting a federal government that is more responsive to the people it represents.”

No, but we already have a mechanism for making government accountable. It’s called an election. Paul had ample opportunities to present his grievances, and I support some of his views, such as his opposition to federal intrusion in states that have decriminalized marijuana.

Nevertheless, even his own party rejected the popular congressman and his agenda after he enjoyed a brief spell as its frontrunner in some polls.

Besides, even most Texans oppose secession, judging by a 2009 Rasmussen Reports poll that found only 18 percent would vote to secede. More recently, the secession petitions have been joined by anti-secession petitions of various sorts. Perhaps the secessionists should consider self-deportation.

The big lesson of “Lincoln” is that democratic governance of a large, diverse republic requires compromises. You can’t always get what you want, but we can work together across partisan lines to get what we need.

And if at first you don’t secede, wait until the next election.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. I wonder Mr. Page if the Sons of Liberty made peace with the King of England and there was no American revolution and blood shed if America would exist today as we know it.

    CarmineD

  2. "Perhaps the secessionists should consider self-deportation." They would not be missed.

  3. One might assume that the secessionists are just making a statement about something rather than truly wishing to secede. It is probably very similar to all of the celebrities who have over the years said, "If candidate X wins this election, I will leave the country and renounce my citizenship." And then they pretty much never actually do it. We live in an age of hyperbole where it seems that to state something, you must greatly overstate it for effect.

  4. Texas should take notice.

    They got over 100,000 people signed up quickly. The important part is that most of those that signed are not in Texas.

    That shows me that many in the U.S. would be happy to see Texas go. ;-)

  5. The successionist have their own network (Fox). Their own facts. Then they get the attention they want. But they lost the last election.