Las Vegas Sun

April 28, 2015

Currently: 78° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

FDIC sets out to seize Tarkanian family’s Nevada assets

Updated Thursday, Oct. 11, 2012 | 9:21 a.m.

Click to enlarge photo

Congressional candidate Danny Tarkanian talks to the media at his primary election night party at Born and Raised tavern, Tuesday, June 12, 2012.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. made a move Wednesday to start seizing Nevada assets from congressional candidate Danny Tarkanian and members of his family toward a $17 million judgment, apparently put in motion because, lawyers argue, Tarkanian missed a key deadline to file an objection.

In a court filing first reported by political journalist Jon Ralston, lawyers for the FDIC stated that the Tarkanian family’s lawyers had missed a mutually agreed upon Oct. 8 deadline to file documents opposing the FDIC’s claim to his property in Nevada.

Not filing any objection on time counts as a forfeit, the FDIC argued, clearing the way for them to start seizing Tarkanians’ property after the next scheduled court hearing on Oct. 22.

“Local Rule 7.1.e.2 requires a party opposing a motion to file an opposition by the due date,” FDIC lawyers wrote in the filing. “In light of Defendants’ failure to timely file an opposition to the instant motion or timely request an extension of time, FDIC-R’s motion should be granted as unopposed.”

But in an interview with the Las Vegas Sun Thursday morning, Danny Tarkanian said there was a good reason for his lawyer having missed the filing date, and didn’t expect it would affect the outcome of the case at all.

“My attorney missed it because his father passed away,” Tarkanian said. “There’s things that go on behind the scenes that affect things...things that happen personally. That’s where we’re at and that’s what we have to deal with.”

“This is a procedural matter, it has nothing to do with the merits of our case and whether we win or lose at the end,” Tarkanian added. “That’s going to be at the court of appeals...So it’s a non-story.”

Tarkanian explained that his family is starting court-mandated settlement talks on the matter that started when his family put up land in Henderson as collateral for an investment in a California real estate venture. The deal went south when the bank behind the deal failed in the economic crisis. The government foreclosed on the Tarkanian’s collateral property, but didn’t collect nearly the amount the Tarkanian’s had valued it at when they entered the California land deal at the height of the market in 2007. Because the FDIC only guarantees up to $250,000 in assets when banks fail, they started coming after the Tarkanians for the rest -- and in May, a federal judge gave the FDIC carte blanche to do so.

But the Tarkanians -- or Danny Tarkanian, at least -- do not seem at all ready to concede to the FDIC because they are starting to play hardball in the Nevada courts.

“Even if they do come in and start going after our assets, that’s what happens, that’s normal, it’s not going to affect us or force us into bankruptcy,” Tarkanian said.

And certainly, Tarkanian stressed, it will not change anything before Election Day. Tarkanian is the Republican candidate running to represent Nevada’s new 4th congressional district.

“There’s nothing that’s going to happen before the election...There’s no chance of filing bankruptcy before this election and until we get this matter resolved,” Tarkanian said, estimating that resolution of the FDIC matter “is going to be weeks away if not a month or two away.”

Tarkanian also wanted to make it clear that the danger of filing bankruptcy was more of a concern to other members of his family named in the suit than himself.

“If a bond is required it could force some members [of my family] to file bankruptcy,” Tarkanian said. “But some members are not all members and they are different than me personally.”

But when asked to clarify if there was any chance of him potentially filing bankruptcy as a sitting congressman, he demurred.

“What may happen or not happen is hard to determine,” he said. “But I’m not concerned about it.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 7 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Gee, nice timing. Kind of like the announcement of the lower unemployment figures! Do you think Obama is using the govt. to do his bidding politically?

  2. Mr. Griffin...


    The whole 'conspiracy' to 'get Danny' started back when the Evil Gubbermint took control of his mind and talked him into investing all that borrowed 'hard cash' into a hare-brained scheme featuring ponies and a hotel in California, using Tark-owned land on the L.V. Blvd as collateral.

    THEN, the Evil Gubbermint FORCED lil' Tark to miss a very important court filing (probably tied both he and his lawyers up on that particular Friday, maybe stashed them in a storage unit).

    Complicit in this dastardly plot is Robert A. Dyson, Jr., his wife, Don Drysdale (sold the land to Dyson), the La Jolla bank that went belly-up (which brought the FDIC into the fray), and of course, Barack Obama, who designed & plotted to become President of the United States of America back in 2008 so he could 'get Danny Tarkanian' through the FDIC in October, 2012.

    Good call!

  3. So what's preventing Mr. T. from liquidating those assets he'd lose in bankruptcy and paying FDIC his "excess" net worth?

  4. A republican mindset - he doesn't want to pay for his mistakes, he wants us to.

  5. Don't put it past the Republican no accounts electing him;they made that medicare fraudster governor in Florida didn't they ?

  6. It seems Fair and Balanced to me.

  7. Mr. Tarkanian touts himself as a small business owner, and a job creator in his latest political ad. What small business, besides being a perpetual loser candidate for any and all political offices, has he been a part of? I hope he does go bankrupt so he'll get off the political stage, and realize what a total loser he really is.