Las Vegas Sun

May 5, 2015

Currently: 66° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Health District accused of undercutting private outfit on vaccines

The Southern Nevada Health District is abusing a federal vaccine program for the poor by unfairly selling the vaccines to the general public and undercutting private competitors, an antitrust complaint filed in federal court alleges.

The complaint was filed by The Vaccine Center, which offers competitive immunization programs in Las Vegas.

Jennifer Sizemore, a Health District spokeswoman, said SNHD has not yet been served with the complaint. Sizemore said she could not comment on active litigation.

Codefendants in the complaint are the drug manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Apexus Inc., the manager of the federal 340 Prime Vendor Program, which was set up by Congress to serve as a safety net for the poor and indigent.

Although SNHD’s mission is to be a “safety-net” provider to the poor and indigent, it operates a commercial business that generates millions of dollars in revenue annually by competing against private clinics and doctors for immunization services to the adult, non-Medicaid population, the complaint says.

The complaint says SNHD buys its vaccines at sharply reduced prices from GlaxoSmithKline under the 340B Program.

SNHD is skirting the regulations of the program by reselling those cheaper vaccines intended for the poor to the general population at lower costs than its competitors — a violation of the laws governing the program, the complaint says.

“SNHD has been able to crush private-sector competition, drive private medical clinics and doctors out of business and monopolize markets for fee-based immunization services,” the complaint said.

The complaint says SNHD has entered into lucrative immunization contracts with MGM Resorts Health Plan, Sands Expo and Convention Center, Silver Nugget Gaming LLC, Boulder City and the Las Vegas Hilton.

The Vaccine Center claims it is the only major remaining competitor to SNHD and that is has suffered a substantial loss of business and revenue in excess of $75,000 at its two Las Vegas clinics. The Vaccine Center also claims it has lost the opportunity to expand elsewhere as a result of SNHD’s conduct.

The plaintiff is seeking triple damages, punitive damages and an injunction against the defendants.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. The private company is concerned about profit while the Health District isn't. Clear?

  2. Hmmm! Isn't capitalism about competition? Why doesn't the Vaccine Center lower their prices to be competitive?

    This statement leaves me laughing hysterically...

    "SNHD has been able to crush private-sector competition, drive private medical clinics and doctors out of business and monopolize markets for fee-based immunization services," the complaint said."

    Yeah! I can see all those providers who cannot exist without the fee for vaccines. If this is the case, why isn't the Vaccine Center posing the same threat? That statement is an insult to intelligence.

    I am all for SNHD overseeing and supplying vaccines. We very much need to encourage people to get vaccinations as a serious public health issue. High prices means fewer people who will get vaccinated, putting all whom they come in contact with in danger, which can be life threatening.

    I can only imagine what the prices are for a company that has decided to compete with SNHD and specializes in only one service, then claims and anti-trust problem. What an injustice.

    Insurance companies get a free ride from anti-trust laws, but not the agency entrusted with public health and safety. What a crock!