Las Vegas Sun

April 26, 2015

Currently: 65° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


Online gaming is more than political

The Day of Atonement has come and gone for another year.

That is the day that Jews around the world atone for our sins and ask God to inscribe us for another year in the Book of Life. It is a day we pray for all people of good will to be inscribed in that Book. Emphasis on the good will part.

Meanwhile, back in real life, the United States is preparing for another presidential election, one of the distinctions that sets us apart from almost every other country. We have peaceful transitions of power in the United States, in contrast to so much of what we see and hear on the news about other people around the globe yearning to be free but having great difficulty getting there.

That means for the next five or six weeks, politics will rule the day. It will rule the airwaves, the Internet and pretty much every facet of our waking and, dare I say it, sleeping parts of our lives. Even though most Americans have decided for whom they will vote for all national, state and local offices, there are still a few — hard to believe it — who need more time to decide. And so all we will hear and see until Election Day is the sound of a lot more money being spent to persuade a lot fewer voters. It is all politics, all the time.

But that doesn’t mean that politics does or should determine all that is done for us or to us. Sometimes there are noble reasons why the politicians act the way they do. But, I admit, it is so hard to determine that nobility in the heat of an emotional election cycle.

Based upon what I know to be the case, not what someone on the Internet said or someone at the water cooler whispered — they still have water cooler discussions somewhere, right? — I would like to discuss Internet poker, its importance to Nevada, and the political spin that threatens it and the tens of thousands of jobs to be created and saved in our state.

Along with a number of other Nevadans who understand the stakes involved, I have tried to be helpful in making this thing happen. This thing, by the way, is federal legislation that will regulate the provision of Internet gaming in the United States. As with most things related to cyberspace, the future of bricks-and-mortar businesses — in this case our casino industry — is being challenged by not only a far less expensive way of allowing people to gamble but, as the generations move forward, a far more natural way for people to play.

That doesn’t mean Las Vegas will go away; it just means that the more people are allowed to play their casino-type games from the comfort of their living rooms, the fewer times they will actually get off those couches and come for the real thing. Even 20 percent fewer trips or a similar drop in dollars gambled could have a devastating effect on our economy. Witness the past four years!

So, it is very important that the widespread offering of legal, multistate cyber gambling across all 50 states doesn’t happen. Should that actually be the case, with the race to the bottom that will occur with regard to regulation and taxes, it takes very little imagination to see a time when Las Vegas loses its mass appeal and no longer draws millions of people to our hotel rooms every night for the 2 million people who live here to survive and prosper.

Instead, a federal program of regulation and taxation — with most money going back to the states — makes sense because it will not only prohibit casino gaming on the Internet, which will keep Las Vegas foremost on people’s minds, but it could advance games such as poker so that the billions of untaxed revenue that goes offshore can remain in the United States for the benefit of the people who live in this country. Not to mention the direct benefit to companies with names such as MGM and Caesars and Station and Wynn and ... well, you can figure out what it means when our own gaming companies can get healthier through more jobs in Nevada and more tax revenue available to go where they are needed.

As long as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid stays where he is and as long as President Barack Obama keeps his word to close Yucca Mountain and keep it closed, what was once the greatest threat to our long-term health — physical and economic— will be no longer.

It is my belief that next to Yucca, the online poker initiative will have the biggest impact of anything out there today. We are talking tens of thousands of jobs not lost and thousands gained if this is done right. And just like the Yucca fight, there must be no politics, no Republican or Democrat positions dividing our state’s elected officials, and no gamesmanship played for some short-term advantage for one person or another.

No one knows this better than Reid. With the help of the entire Nevada delegation over the past three decades, he has made good on his word to close Yucca Mountain. He cared not why and how it got closed or which political party or office holder got the credit. Closing Yucca was a Nevada imperative. It still is.

And so is Internet poker.

What disturbs me most because it creates so much confusion among Nevada voters is the ham-handed attempt by our junior senator, Dean Heller, to mix politics into what must be a pan-Nevada effort by all elected officials to do what they can to advance the cause of our state’s major and, most times, only significant industry.

Those who know him have always trusted Reid to do what he says he will do, oftentimes without a clue as to how he will do it. That holds true with regard to Internet poker.

Yes, the polarization in Washington makes the very difficult now nearly impossible, but Harry thrives in times like these. Others just panic!

What Heller has to do, if it is not too late, is rustle up some Republicans the way any senator would do for the benefit of his state. And then he has to do whatever it is that Reid says because that is how Nevada will get what it needs to get done. And he needs to do it without resorting to the political games that have been so evident this month.

With or without Heller’s help, this poker deal must get done, and Reid may be the only person around with the ability to make it happen. He can do it with Heller’s help or he can do it in spite of our junior senator. It is just a question of relevance.

Relevant office holders act in the interests of their state before they consider their own, far less significant, interests. That is how you avoid the Yucca Mountains in your life!

Brian Greenspun is publisher and editor of the Las Vegas Sun.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Mr. Greenspun:

    You're reaching for straws if you're putting your faith and hope in dirty harry and President Obama. It's oft said that necessity is the mother of invention. Perhaps it's time, long overdue, for Nevada to diversify.


  2. Mr. Greenspun, please explain what you mean by tens of thousands of jobs to be created and saved in our state?

    This is one of the big problems with advocates of online poker, people like Mr. Greenspun. They have a voice that can reach many, by they do not have the facts, nor are they educated about online poker. When Mr. Greenspun and other like him speak about online poker and with comments about jobs, please give out the numbers.

    Dean Heller and Harry Reid do not have the votes to pass any type of Federal legislation related to online poker. People like Mr. Greenspun cannot see this, or refuse to see, or are being pressured by the supporters of online poker. Most likely the pressure.

    The poker with all the projected potential, is not ready for acceptance by the American people. The title of the movie "A Bridge to Far" is appropriate. The big problem with legalizing online poker at the Federal level is---expanding of gaming beyond acceptable limits! This will be the beginning of opposition to the expansion of state regulated gaming in the USA. The opposition will come from communities, it will be grassroot. In addition to the bad light being placed on gaming by Sheldon Adelson and Steve Wynn with their public involvement in a dishonest Republican Presidential campaign, gaming is not being represented like it once was by using our organizations like the AGA as being out front, a polished look. Instead we have two individual rich gaming executives backing an extreme party agenda.

    Mr. Greenspun what you should do is rally the reasonable minds in gaming away from the noise of the online poker advocates and promote online poker like gaming has done in the past with other initiatives. Instead of trying to force online poker like forcing the Keystone Pipeline. You know, something we can use, but there is a process that must be followed.

    Stop trying to hurt the future of gaming. Your Dad would see this big picture, be your Dad and start thinging big things! You have the resources, used them wisely!

  3. Setting aside all other arguments for or against online poker, there remains two fundamental issues that I believe have not been adequately addressed by existing technology: cheating (in particular, collusion) and underage gaming.

    Collusion is pathetically easy with online gaming, and I doubt that any good methods exist to detect it. The problem is bad enough in live games, it is rampant online. When one considers that 100s, if not 1000s of dollars can change hands on a single hand of 15/30 limit poker, and just as much at no-limit with much lower blinds, one should see this will be a major problem for the casual player.

    Having almost 15 years experience with ID/age verification software design and implementation, I can say with a fair amount of certainty that I have yet to see a good real-time method to do such. The best methods I have seen involves a human review of scanned documents and photos prior to certification. That process is decidedly not real-time, and is still not as accurate as what can be achieved by photo ID inspection at a brick and mortar establishment (and even THAT is not fool-proof.)

    Even if it were possible to reach 100% accuracy, there is nothing to prevent an adult from giving the password to a minor, or even little Johnny or Jane from obtaining the information from a parent. (Don't scoff at this, it happens much more than you would think for online transactions.)

    As libertarian as I am on moral issues, I am not convinced that online gaming is a good thing, yet.

  4. Online gambling has the same credibility and trustworthiness as designer drugs made in a garage "to spec".