Las Vegas Sun

April 15, 2014

Currently: 74° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

OTHER VOICES:

Will the GOP block background checks?

Another view?

View more of the Las Vegas Sun's opinion section:

Editorials - the Sun's viewpoint.

Columnists - local and syndicated writers.

Letters to the editor - readers' views.

Have your own opinion? Write a letter to the editor.

Is Congress on the verge of turning away from the lessons of the slaughter in Newtown even as Connecticut enacts sweeping laws to curb gun violence? Is the gun lobby hell-bent on aligning our country with such great friends of liberty as Iran, North Korea and Syria by opposing efforts to condition international gun sales on the human rights records of buyers?

The gun lobby seems to want the rest of the world to look upon the United States of America as a nation so crazed about guns that its supine Congress will always collapse before the National Rifle Association.

The bleak future envisioned by the gun extremists was laid out for all to see by the small town of Nelson, Ga. Its town council voted Monday to require all its citizens to own guns. The town says it won’t enforce the measure, but Nelson sends us a dark message: Guns matter more than freedom. The right not to bear arms can be infringed freely.

The vote in the United Nations on Tuesday for a global convention to keep conventional arms out of the hands of human rights violators, terrorists and organized crime figures was overwhelming, 154-3, with 23 abstentions. North Korea, Iran and Syria provided the no votes, while China and Russia were among the abstainers.

It will be years at best before the treaty is implemented, and the NRA (of course) wants to block it in the Senate — in effect preventing background checks for human rights violators. But we can be proud that the United States ignored the weapons fundamentalists and voted yes.

Meanwhile, on a bipartisan basis, the Connecticut Legislature was moving to pass a broad background check bill that would also regulate the private sales of shotguns and rifles, ban high-capacity magazines and expand the list of prohibited assault weapons.

Connecticut Republicans should lobby members of their party in the U.S. Senate. These days, the GOP is all about trying to improve its image. But on guns, it may prove once again that when it matters, extremists rule.

Only one Republican senator, Mark Kirk of Illinois, has had the courage to work with Democrats for a meaningful background check law. Sen. Tom Coburn has shown some boldness in negotiating on a bill with Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y. But the Oklahoma Republican has yet to close a deal that wouldn’t severely weaken its requirements. Otherwise, GOP senators have declined to engage seriously.

There has been much speculation about whether President Obama should have moved even faster after Newtown. And yes, it would have been better if gun-control advocates had united two months ago behind a focused agenda that the president could have pushed immediately.

But contrary to the seventh-inning analysis you’re hearing, the game isn’t over.

A lot has been said about the four to six Senate Democratic holdouts on background checks, but Democrats are likely to provide in the range of 50 votes for a strong bill. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., a traditional NRA supporter, deserves particular kudos for his persistence on behalf of a decent outcome. The real barrier in the Senate comes from Republicans. The question for many of them is whether they honestly think that letting weapons manufacturers dictate the party’s positions on gun violence is a recipe for renewal.

Based on what they have said, a host of GOP senators just might find the daring to tell their party that gutting a background check bill is foolish, substantively and politically. Their ranks include John McCain, who has been brave on this issue in the past, as well as Pat Toomey, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Jeff Flake, Mike Johanns, Dean Heller, Johnny Isakson, Saxby Chambliss, Lamar Alexander, Bob Corker and Rob Portman. They hold the key.

Further down the road, gun control advocates need even more discipline, and they cannot stop organizing after this fight is over. It will take years to build the kind of muscle the gun lobby has. Doing so will create the political space for other measures, including an assault weapons ban.

The good news is that the mobilization for gun sanity is further along now than it has ever been. Members of this anti-violence coalition have proved their strength in Connecticut, Colorado and New York, and they should keep pursuing progress at the state level. Change will eventually bubble up to the halls of Congress.

We are in a long battle. Victory in this round is well within reach. Future victories will require staying power, not recriminations.

E.J. Dionne is a columnist for the Washington Post.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. The notion that Republicans are against reasonable and effective gun control laws is absurd. Guns kill all people regardless of race, color, creed and party affiliation. The NRA has as many Democratic supporters in Congress, like Senator Reid, as Republicans. To suggest that the Republicans are more likely than Democrats to vote against comprehensive background checks, something which the NRA and Wayne La Pierre have advocated for the last 30 years, is just silly unfounded political spin.

    Carmine D

  2. To my fellow bloggers,

    Comprehensive background checks will not help especially because all pertinent data is not going to get into the general data bank, garbage in garbage out. I have a problem with the local gun store dealer or even the local police department being able to access a general data bank that has medical information about anybody and their suitability to own or purchase a gun. If that information does make it to the general data bank how accurate and up to date will it be and who is authorized to input information into this general data bank. This is a very slippery slope we are approaching and some serious thought needs to be done. Germany's Gestopo real strength came from their detailed files and records on every person in their country and eventually other countries and their associates. I don't think anybody around here needs that, as it didn't work out to well for them either. This is just another stepping stone to erode the Constitution and the 2nd Amendment and our ability to defend ourselves. Just an old cop reflecting,

    Gordon Martines........curre.org