Las Vegas Sun

September 1, 2014

Currently: 89° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Nevada Senate committee approves resolution on gay marriage

Updated Thursday, April 11, 2013 | 1:06 p.m.

CARSON CITY — By a party-line vote, the Senate Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections has approved a proposed constitutional amendment to permit same-sex couples to marry.

The resolution passed today would repeal the state's ban on gay marriage and sets out that Nevada would recognize marriages, regardless of gender.

The resolution would have to be approved by this session of the Legislature and again in 2015 before the proposed change could placed on the 2016 election ballot for voters to decide. It now goes to the full Senate.

"All people in Nevada deserve the freedom to marry," said Laura Martin with Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada.

The original proposal sought only to repeal language in the state constitution that defines marriage as between a man and a woman. But a late amendment adopted by the committee today adds that the state "shall recognize marriages and issue marriage licenses, regardless of gender."

"We felt it would be cleaner to both eliminate the current prohibition and make it clear Nevada does not discriminate in any way," said Sen. Tick Segerblom, D-Las Vegas, who introduced the bill.

The amendment drew opposition from Republican Sen. James Settelmeyer of Minden. Settelmeyer said he gave Segerblom his word that he would vote for the original bill but withdrew his support because of the new wording.

"I don't think the subject of marriage should be in the constitution," Settelmeyer said. "This is adding something else in, and I can't support that."

He was joined by Sen. Barbara Cegavske, R-Las Vegas, in opposing the measure, SJR13.

In support were Las Vegas Democrats Patricia Spearman, the committee chairwoman, and Mark Manendo and North Las Vegas Democrat Kelvin Atkinson.

Voters in 2002 approved an amendment to the Constitution that “only a marriage between a male and female person shall be recognized and given effect in this state.” The vote was 337,197 to 164,573.

The Legislature later approved a law allowing same-sex couple to register as domestic partners with the Secretary of State’s Office but did not convey the full benefits of marriage.

As of April 1, there were 4,157 registered domestic partners in Nevada, but a spokeswoman for the office said some of them were male-female couples.

Janine Hansen, president of the conservative group Nevada Families for Freedom, called the committee's vote a "kick in the teeth" of voters who approved the Protection of Marriage Act in 2000 and 2002, defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

"It makes same-sex marriage the standard in Nevada," she said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. A different perspective. I'm gay and Robert and I have been together 19 years and were legally wed in Canada 9 years ago. We say NO! NO! NO! To my friends who have changed their minds on this issue we can't thank you enough. We are heartened to see how many Nevadans have thought this through in a critical wayand have seen that our marriage has not affected yours and that all citizens gay and straight should be treated equally under the law.
    Maybe the great "defenders of marriage" like Senator Ensign and Governor Gibbons helped you to change your mind to believe that civil marriage should be considered a right for gay couples after all. Which brings me to the point. NOBODY'S CIVIL RIGHTS SHOULD BE PUT UP FOR A VOTE! THAT'S WHY THEY ARE CALLED RIGHTS! These votes never should have happened to begin with. We trust the courts. We believe in the justice system. And we believe that marriage equality will one day be law. But a resounding NO for asking people to judge me again with the hateful lawn signs and misleading commercials appropriate not even for a five year old let alone a critically thinking adult. It's demeaning, it's hurtful, and frankly Robert and I have seen and had enough ignorance and stupidity thrown at us over this issue to last us the rest of our natural lives. Nevada did a dumb thing. Twice. No more, thank you.

  2. Note to Janine Hansen: this bill does not "make same-sex marriage the standard in Nevada." It makes equality the standard.