Las Vegas Sun

May 3, 2015

Currently: 78° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Lawmaker: GAO report shows lives, safety of Nevada workers at risk

Dina Titus

Dina Titus

WASHINGTON —Lawmakers are reintroducing a bill to expand the federal government’s ability to assist states in performing their workplace safety oversight obligations, after a government report indicated Nevada was falling woefully short of its goals.

According to a Government Accountability Office report released this week, Nevada conducted only 59 percent of the 2,132 inspections it aimed to conduct in 2011, and barely two-thirds of the inspections it aimed to conduct last year, even after lowering expectations to an annual goal total of 1,900.

And Nevada has one of the worst state track records when it comes to retaining experienced personnel: More than half of the state’s safety inspectors — and at the GAO’s last fiscal 2013 count, the state only had 21 — have less than five years’ experience on the job.

“It is concerning that GAO found several unresolved problems in Nevada’s worker safety program that are putting workers’ lives and safety at risk,” said Nevada Rep. Dina Titus, a bill co-sponsor. “Congress needs to ensure that all states, including Nevada, have the resources they need to protect workers and then follow through with appropriate remedies to problems uncovered.”

GAO has been closely monitoring the activities Nevada’s Occupational Health and Safety Administration since 2009, a probe that began after the Las Vegas Sun published a Pulitzer Prize-winning series of stories that revealed how the failures of government, management and unions contributed to several deaths at construction sites along the Las Vegas Strip.

The report blamed budget cuts, but also poor prioritization of resources, for contributing to Nevada’s disappointing performance results.

“Nevada’s challenges have persisted, even though the state matched its federal OSHA grant,” the GAO authors wrote, noting how Nevada had put more than $3 million into revitalizing its workplace oversight in the last few years.

But according to OSHA, Nevada was never able to spend the money on rebuilding. Instead, it spent significant funds on training new hires, but not enough on paying for travel to worksites and setting competitive salaries for the inspectors — many of whom quickly turn around and take higher-paying jobs in the private sector. (A safety inspector in Nevada makes an average of $39,724 per year.)

Thus the count of Nevada’s team of safety inspectors fell, from 28 to 21 between fiscal 2012 and 2013, when federal officials had expected it to rise to 32 inspectors. Because those inspectors are compelled to respond to the riskiest worksites first, Nevada’s completion rate of regularly programmed checks fell to 17 percent of the workplaces under its authority.

Nevada is one of 22 states that is in charge of its own workplace monitoring, while other states depend on the federal government.

Should federal overseers determine Nevada’s system is failing, the federal OSHA has the right to take over running the process.

The bill would create a mechanism for partial federal intervention, so the government could guide flailing states through a more effective policy to address shortfalls, before forcing a transfer of all authority to the federal government.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. A miner in Nevada still can not have timely formal complaints for Safety Health Harassment and false records VIOLATIONS in Nevada's mining industry investigated.

    A 2012 NV Attorney Generals opinion states that here in Nevada it is ok fine for toxic harardous caustic Lithium process errs to breach and leave containment flow across NV SR 265 into a children's play-ground where young unsuspecting children play and within 200 feet of peoples homes animals and gardens.

    A formal complaint was lodged through Rep Dina Titus in 2009-2010 when Dina warmed a chair on the U.S. House Labor Committee. Did Rep. Dina Titus help? She did not have a problem helping to cover-up a fire in a RMGC haul truck cab an wrongful termination for removing the defective parts that caused the fire as per RMGC written policy, NV and Federal-Health and Safety Regulations.

    PRupp using POB 125 SP NV 89047

    P.S. If you need help in Nevadas mining industry for unlawful acts contrary to working in an safe and healthy environment, covered-up with false records, contacting Rep Dina Titus is as much help as Gov Sandoval...NO HELP WHATSOEVER. They both should return ALL MINING CONTRIBUTIONS until they have acted honorably and a lawful investigation of the record at Round Mountain Gold is Performed!

  2. (A safety inspector in Nevada makes an average of $39,724 per year.) Is this wages only or does this ALSO include health and retirement benefits?