Las Vegas Sun

April 25, 2015

Currently: 59° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Harry Reid weighs in on Alabama voting rights case

Harry Reid

Harry Reid

WASHINGTON — Sen. Harry Reid weighed in Friday on an upcoming Supreme Court case that could prove pivotal in determining whether campaigns for voter ID laws proliferate.

Reid filed a friend of the court brief in Shelby County, Ala. v. Holder, a case that challenges a section of the Voting Rights Act giving the federal government the power to block changes to voting laws in 16 states with a history of racial discrimination. Alabama is among them.

Reid called that section — Section 5 — “a critical tool in upholding the promise of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.”

The 14th Amendment, among other things, establishes territorial birthright citizenship and guarantees that “no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.”

The 15th Amendment gives Congress the right to pass legislation to ensure that “the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color or previous condition of servitude.”

“The recent election demonstrates that Section 5 remains necessary to ensure that every eligible voter has the right to cast a ballot,” Reid said in a statement Friday. “If the Supreme Court dismantles this historic civil rights will be a tremendous step backwards for freedom and equality in this country.”

No state has actually proposed a law to limit voting rights of individuals of a particular race.

But opponents of voter ID laws have argued that the requirement to present an ID to vote unfairly suppresses votes of minorities and the poor.

On that reasoning, President Barack Obama’s Justice Department, led by Eric Holder, has made an effort to stop certain voter ID laws. But because Section 5 only applies to a handful of states, the federal government’s push against voter ID laws has been somewhat haphazard.

The Department of Justice successfully blocked Texas from passing a voter ID law under its Section 5 powers last year. But when Pennsylvania, Kansas, Tennessee and Wisconsin adopted voter ID laws, the Justice Department had no power to intervene.

Shelby County, which is largely made up of the south suburban areas of Birmingham, is in Alabama, a state subject to Section 5 review. The county is awaiting an answer from the federal government as to whether the voter ID law it passed in 2011 can take effect in 2014.

Shelby County argues that the formula that the Voting Rights Act uses — a formula based on registration rates from the late 1960s and early 1970s — is out of date because the racial barriers to the ballot box that existed then no longer exist.

Opponents say the discrimination has simply become more subtle.

The case, however, will not be determined on the merits of Alabama’s voter ID law application.

In filing its case against Holder, Shelby County is directly challenging the constitutionality of Congress’s 2006 vote to reauthorize Section 5, along with the whole Voting Rights Act, for another 25 years.

The House of Representative voted for the reauthorization with a vote of 390-33; the Senate voted to reauthorize the Act 98 to 0.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Nonsense! I recently had to change Medicare supplement insurers. The doctors office, dentists office and the pharmacy all required SSN's & picture ID's. Try cashing a check, using a credit card, applying for credit and on & on without proof of who you are and see what happens. Asking voters to prove who they say they are is a no-brainer. Being against such a common sense requirement tells me leftists such as Harry the Red know there's a lot of ineligibles marking ballots for Dumbocrats and they want to keep the band wagon rolling. BTW, why are ballots printed in foreign languages? Isn't one requirement of becoming a naturalized American citizen you must be able to read and write in English?

  2. If you don't own land that's free from emcumberement then you should not get to vote. [Sarcasim]