Las Vegas Sun

July 6, 2015

Currently: 87° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

UNLV stadium planners say they can overcome FAA’s height restrictions


Majestic Realty Co.

UNLV Now mega events center rendering.

The Federal Aviation Administration has raised concerns about the height of UNLV's proposed stadium.

Federal regulations require that developers looking to build a tall structure near an airport must first consult with the FAA. The agency analyzes blueprints and determines if the proposed building poses any hazards to air travel based on its height and proximity to the airport. The UNLV Now "mega-events center" would be less than two miles from McCarran International Airport.

The FAA doesn't have any authority over local planning and building permits, so these aeronautical studies are only a recommendation. However, Clark County requires FAA approval for all proposed buildings in the county’s jurisdiction, which includes UNLV’s Maryland Parkway campus.

Submitted plans for the UNLV Now call for a 205-feet-tall stadium.

In a letter to university officials, the FAA said the stadium was too tall, posing an "adverse physical or electromagnetic interference effect" on flights coming in and out of McCarran. The FAA argued the stadium as presented could affect departure and landing routes, block radar and interfere with communication signals between planes and the air-control tower.

The FAA requested that UNLV Now officials decide between two options:

• Revise the proposal for a stadium no taller than 106 feet. (UNLV’s Thomas & Mack Center was designed at a height of 104 feet.)

• Request another study for a stadium up to 168 feet, which is the FAA's "not-to-exceed height."

UNLV Now's project leader Don Snyder said the university was well aware of FAA's concerns but had submitted taller-than-expected plans to test the FAA's building parameters.

"That's a very normal part of a project like this," Snyder said. "We want maximum flexibility because we're in the preliminary design phase."

The actual plans for the UNLV stadium call for a turf-to-ceiling height of 195 feet, which is still beyond the FAA's maximum height limit.

However, UNLV and its developer partner, Majestic Realty, have always planned to sink the stadium about 30 feet into the ground to create a "bowl" effect, Snyder said. Such a stadium would fit within the FAA's parameters, he said.

"Just being close to the airport adds a few more hoops," Snyder said. "But I feel really confident we're on the right track."

This wouldn't be the first time the FAA had concerns about tall buildings in the Las Vegas Valley.

In 2007, developers behind the Crown Las Vegas resort concept had called for a 1,888-feet-tall observation tower on the southern end of the Strip, a few miles from McCarran. After the FAA study, developers scaled back its plans to a 1,064-feet tower. The $5 billion resort, which was scheduled to be completed in 2014, was scrapped in 2008.

In the mid-1990s, developers of the Stratosphere scaled back their tower proposal from 1,800 feet to its current 1,149-feet height. Developers also decided to build the observation tower within the boundaries of the city of Las Vegas instead of Clark County because Las Vegas has fewer regulations for FAA approval on buildings.

Similar concerns from the FAA during the early 2000s caused delays in building University of Phoenix Stadium, the Glendale, Ariz., complex that is home for the NFL’s Arizona Cardinals. In a more extreme case that happened a few years ago, the city of San Diego forced a developer to chop 20 feet off of a building that was built beyond FAA specifications.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. This is simply not the right location for a stadium. Why is it necessary to build on the UNLV campus? Isn't the purpose of the university to provide education and not entertainment? If Las Vegas needs a football stadium, it should be funded privately and UNLV athletics can sign a lease to use it.
    Please don't use my tax dollars to line some developer's pockets.

  2. My concern is this. As a Pilot Is the UNLV Campus or the projected Stadium currently in the approch path for MCarran? Reason being if thats the case then the Approch path will have to be displaced on account of aircraft are not to over fly Stadiums. And if it's displaced then who will that displacement impact as far as home owners and such?

  3. Just Move it to the Corner of Maryland and Tropicana, where the miles of Crap Strip Centers could be bulldozed down in a day. If the current owners want far higher prices than what the property is worth - Increase Property Taxes Accordingly and keep moving up Maryland avenue raising Tax values as you go along. This will be the Revenue stream to help pay for the Stadium and purchase the required land without impacting the Airport.