Las Vegas Sun

July 8, 2015

Currently: 89° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Lawmakers skeptical of plan to merge Nevada parole division, prison system

CARSON CITY — Gov. Brian Sandoval’s proposal to merge Nevada’s parole division with the prison system got a rugged reception Tuesday from legislators who said they didn’t see any savings or improved services for inmates.

Assembly Speaker Marilyn Kirkpatrick, D-North Las Vegas, said she was “a little bit skeptical” and complained she was not getting enough answers from Greg Cox, the director of the state Department of Corrections.

Cox testified to a joint Assembly-Senate budget subcommittee that there is a “disconnect” between the state Parole and Probation Division and the prison system.

Parole officers don’t come to the prison to prepare inmates for release, Cox said. The goal is to ready prisoners for their return to society so they don’t become repeat offenders.

But subcommittee Chairman David Bobzien, D-Reno, said the Parole and Probation Division already has a release unit. “I’m trying to understand how this improves that,” he said. “It sounds to me the services are already in place.”

Kirkpatrick questioned whether Cox would return later and ask for more officers. He said he would not and that the realignment is cost neutral.

But Kirkpatrick said the realignment “needs a lot more work.”

Cox defended the merger, saying Nevada is one of a few states not providing services to ready inmates for return to the streets.

Sandoval’s proposal also ran into stiff opposition from the Nevada State Law Enforcement Officers’ Association, which said the plan “has very significant costs, a lack of any proven efficiencies and major public safety issues.”

President Ron Cuzze said the merger would open the door for future governors to turn over probation functions to the counties.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. The mission of one of these agencies is to keep people in prison. The mission of the other is to supervise those who have been released from prison. And some "political genius" wants to combine the two?????

  2. Clearly, Nevada Lawmakers should be "skeptical" and tread carefully with this proposed plan. There may be possible conflicts of interests, and just because California is doing it, does not make it a good idea for Nevada. A complete survey of what other states are doing, the costs and benefits, would be the way to go before proceeding.

    Where's Bradley Chapline on this matter? He would definitely have something to say!

    Blessings and Peace,