Las Vegas Sun

April 19, 2015

Currently: 77° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Tax incentives bill to lure filmmakers to Nevada meets resistance


Seven Ft / Special to the Sun

Crews film a scene from the foreign film “The Gambler” at the Plaza in downtown Las Vegas.

Senator Aaron Ford of the 11th (2013) Nevada Senatorial District.

Senator Aaron Ford of the 11th (2013) Nevada Senatorial District.

Sen. Ben Kieckhefer

Sen. Ben Kieckhefer

A Senate Democratic bill to give tax credits to lure the film industry to Nevada has raised questions from Republicans that it might result in less revenue for public schools and local governments.

Sen. Aaron Ford's bill drew wide support from labor and economic development agencies, as he testified it would bring new jobs to the state from the movie and television industries.

But Sen. Ben Kieckhefer, R-Reno, said he was worried that it would affect the property taxes going to local government and “create a liability for local governments.”

SB165 would allow the state to offer up to $50 million a year in tax credits to movie and television producers who bring their units to Nevada for filming. Ford, D-Las Vegas, said the television program “Vegas” was filmed in New Mexico, which offers such a tax incentive.

He testified to the Senate Taxation Committee on Thursday that Louisiana was also attracting filmmakers with its tax credits.

Supporters of the bill said it would create new jobs, car rentals, food purchases and motel and hotel occupancy. The additional tax revenue would more than offset the money lost through tax credits.

If a production company did not use all of its tax credits, it could sell them to a Nevada firm. And that raised the concern of Senate Minority Leader Michael Roberson, R-Las Vegas, who questioned the transfer to another Nevada business such as a casino. Roberson, a co-sponsor of the bill, said he supports the concept but wanted more details.

He also referred to prior testimony of Steve Hill, director of the state Office of Economic Development who favored putting money in other development efforts.

Roberson said his impression from the Hill testimony is that states gave away too much for what they received in return.

Ford said he had talked with Hill who favored the concept, but Hill was concerned about the financial consequences. Ford said that states that offered a tax credit of 20 percent or below were not successful in their programs

Carole Villardo of the Nevada Taxpayers Association urged the committee to examine all the tax exemption bills that are being considered before acting on one for the movie industry.

The tax credit would not be available for filming a sporting event, political advertisement or pornography.

A second bill by the Democratic leadership to provide tax incentives to businesses that hire unemployed workers got a more favorable reaction.

Sen. Debbie Smith, D-Sparks, said the basic concept is to give employers a break on their payroll tax if they hire a worker who has been jobless for six months or more.

“We need to be innovative to bring down the 10.2 percent unemployment,” she told the committee.

SB172 would allow a business to avoid paying the modified business tax on the salary of the unemployed worker for a year and then pay only 50 percent of the tax for another three years.

In his message to the Legislature, Gov. Brian Sandoval proposed a $25 million tax break on the payroll tax.

Smith said the bill does not allow an employer to fire a worker and then hire a replacement to avoid the tax. Under questioning, she said she would have to look at how seasonal workers would be treated.

The bill gained support from builders, labor and other employer groups.

The committee did not take action on the bills.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. There is NO REASON to give incentives to the film industry in Nevada. With no income tax, directors and starts like to claim Nevada residency. Filming here helps them with that. The film industry pays negligible taxes to start with. Does anyone believe that Dpt of Tax has access to accurate records of the equipment, supplies, costumes purchased for filming here--to see if correct tax treatment was paid? Even so, the most they'd be paying doesn't come near to covering the additional costs to Metro for closing streets.

  2. This shows just how schizophrenic Dumbocrats really are. On the one hand, they say raising taxes on the "rich," businesses or increasing the minimum wage will not affect job growth. On the other, they say tax "incentives" are needed to grow jobs. They are all as screwy as Broooks. The main difference is his craziness is open for all to see. With Dumbocrats such as Ford, one must read between the lines. No tax breaks; no subsidies; no picking winners and losers.