Las Vegas Sun

July 1, 2015

Currently: 105° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Safety group recommends tougher traffic laws in Nevada

CARSON CITY — Nevada should add traffic laws to curb the rising number of highway deaths, according to a national safety group that ranks the state in the middle of the pack for safety.

In its 10th annual report, Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety suggest Nevada adopt such things as an ignition interlock law, more restrictions on teen drivers and a primary seat belt enforcement law.

Jacqueline S. Gillan, president of the coalition based in Washington, D.C., said that “traffic safety laws to protect children and teens, keep drunk drivers off of our roads and stop distracted driving have the potential to save thousands of lives and billions of dollars annually.”

State officials reported last week that 258 people were killed in traffic crashes in 2012, up from 246 in 2011. About half of those killed were not wearing a seat belt, officials said.

Rudy Malfabon, director of the state Department of Transportation, said his agency is not sponsoring a primary seat belt law but would support it if it is introduced in the Legislature.

Now, police can only issue a citation for not wearing a seat belt if the motorist is stopped for another violation. A primary seat belt law would permit officers to stop cars for the sole reason of people not being buckled up.

Nevada, according to the safety group, has eight of 15 recommended traffic safety laws.

New York is rated tops with 13, and South Dakota ranks last with three.

Gillan said a 2012 federal law provides financial incentives for adopting the recommended safety laws.

One recommendation is Nevada pass an ignition interlock law. Drivers convicted of drunk driving would be required to have the device in their vehicles, which could not be started without passing a breath-analyzer test.

The group also recommends Nevada put restrictions on night driving by teens. It said 20 percent of teens killed in crashes occur from 9 p.m. to midnight.

Nevada should also require booster seats for children up to 7 years old, the group said.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Thank you, Washington bureacrats, for reaching your long, nanny-statism all the way across the country into Nevada. Haven't you learned (yet?!) that you cannot legislate intelligence, you can only make efforts to educate. And when those efforts to educate fail, government should get the heck out of the way.

    But guess what? There are little to no efforts to educate drivers in Nevada (or any other state, for that matter) and our licensing system is a joke that borders on failure.

    If you want better drivers and fewer traffic deaths, then invest in better training and licensing procedures. Annual in-car testing is a start; more legal restrictions and punitive action is a failure to launch. In any case, Nevada should remember what it's like to stand up to the loving smothering of Mommy Washington and say, thank you, but no thanks.