Las Vegas Sun

April 18, 2015

Currently: 77° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Marijuana dispensary bill must clear $2 million hurdle


Andrew Doughman

Nevada Assemblywoman Michele Fiore inspects the product and learns about the different uses for and varieties of marijuana during a trip to a dispensary in Arizona on Friday, March 22, 2013.

CARSON CITY — State Sen. Tick Segerblom says he’s optimistic Gov. Brian Sandoval will sign his medical marijuana dispensary bill, even though it could cost Nevada some $2 million.

Segerblom questioned why it would cost the state Department of Taxation $2 million to collect the sales tax and other fees from more than 50 dispensaries the bill would authorize around the state.

Sandoval said last week the bill might cost the state money and that the issue was being researched.

Segerblom said the Department of Taxation should have raised this issue while the bill was being processed in the Legislature. It imposes a 2 percent excise tax on the sale of medical marijuana.

Sandoval said Monday he had not yet received an answer from the Department of Taxation.

The bill requires that a person applying for a license for a dispensary must have $250,000 in liquid assets, pay a $5,000 fee for submitting an application and $30,000 for an initial license. There would be a $5,000 annual renewal fee.

Segerblom’s Judiciary Committee visited Arizona to see how that state runs its medical marijuana program. Arizona generated more than $7.9 million in the first 14 months of permitting dispensaries.

Nevada’s bill would allow up to 40 dispensaries in Clark County, 10 in Washoe County, two in Carson City and one each in the remaining rural counties.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 2 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. This bill is nothing more than a money grab. For 12 years we have been told to "grow our own" or else face jail time. Now we're given a bill that bars us from growing and forces folks to buy the taxed medicine. If it was alright to grow for 12 years, why is it now banned by this bill?

  2. Chunky says:

    Yep! It really boils down to how much revenue it will generate and whether that revenue will be used wisely.

    Are our other prescription medications taxed and are regular pharmacies charged these kinds of fees for licenses which are really just two sneaky words for yet another tax? Chunky doesn't know the answer.

    If not and this is a legitimate prescription pharmaceutical like a cancer or heart drug the product and dispensaries should not be taxed or charged licensing fees any different than anything else.

    Funny how all that works!

    That's what Chunky thinks!