Las Vegas Sun

July 7, 2015

Currently: 94° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Sun Editorial:

Kill the zombie

Enough politics; get rid of Yucca Mountain plan once and for all

Nevada’s congressional delegation has worked diligently for more than a quarter of a century to kill the federal government’s plan to build a nuclear waste dump at Yucca Mountain, which is 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas.

With the help of President Barack Obama, who has honored a campaign promise to Nevadans to work to shut the project down, Yucca Mountain has been at death’s door for several years.

But pushed by the nuclear industry and its supporters in Congress, Yucca Mountain continues to stick around. And last week, Republicans in the House of Representatives once again tried to revive it.

As Karoun Demirjian reported in the Sun, the Republican-led House Appropriations Committee rolled out a budget proposal that includes $25 million for work on Yucca Mountain. An accompanying statement took a shot at the Obama administration, labeling its opposition to Yucca Mountain as “politically motivated,” claiming that it “runs contrary to the will of the Congress and the American people.”

So, the effort to kill Yucca Mountain is “politically motivated” but the effort to support this flawed boondoggle isn’t?

Risibly, Yucca Mountain’s supporters have blamed opposition on politics for years, trying to dismiss Nevada’s valid concerns. The fact is that support for the project has always been rooted in politics, pressed by the wealthy nuclear industry.

The original selection of a site for a nuclear waste site excised places that matched specifications but were in politically powerful states. The most notable moment came in 1987 with the “Screw Nevada” bill, which was brought at the behest of members of Congress who didn’t want to see nuclear waste in their states. The bill, which passed despite Nevada’s objection, short-circuited a selection process by naming Yucca Mountain the nation’s nuclear dump.

In 2002, again over Nevada’s objection, Yucca Mountain was pushed ahead. Even though it hadn’t completed all of its preliminary work, the Bush administration asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a license to build the dump, and members of Congress supported by the nuclear industry approved.

And Nevada is being political?

Supporters of the plan say Nevada has plenty to gain economically from the project by negotiating for benefits from the government, and they say there would be jobs that would come with Yucca Mountain.

Unfortunately, those arguments gained some traction in the state during the recession. But it’s important to remember that no one has ever promised money to the state; in fact, some members of Congress have said Nevada has a patriotic duty to take the waste — for free.

And what would the economic impact really be? After some short-term construction jobs, how many people does it take to baby-sit radioactive waste?

So, those arguments don’t work. But that hasn’t stopped the Republicans in Congress, who also try to take a more noble tack. They point to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, which labels Yucca Mountain the nation’s nuclear waste dump. Thus, the Obama administration is acting contrary to the law and should fund the dump.

But, by that logic, Republicans would be supporting and funding Obamacare, wouldn’t they? It is the law. The Supreme Court upheld it. So, why have they voted more than three dozen times in the House to repeal it?

Instead of wasting all of that time, the Republicans should look at the facts. Yucca Mountain is just what they claim Obamacare to be: a multibillion-dollar albatross, terrible policy and a gross intrusion of the federal government on a state’s rights.

So, Republicans should consider doing something fruitful and take the nonpolitical recommendation of a blue-ribbon commission that recently said the nation should get past Yucca Mountain and try something else.

It’s beyond time to quit playing politics and kill this project once and for all.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 6 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. The People of Nevada voted "NO!" to having this High Level Radioactive Waste Depository years ago, and WE are the People of the United States of America as well.

    Once again, this is a case of political BULLIES trying to push around Nevada, which has been a pretty good victim for years. Nevada has been compromised and bullied to the point of being bottom on most every desireable list known to mankind. Nevada possesses the lion's share of immigrants, both legal and illegal, who could care less one way or the other. Nevada is home to a People who have been bullied by the MINING/GAMING/RESORT industries for over a century.

    It is time for victim Nevada to stand up and scream, "We are mad as hell and we are NOT going to take it anymore"!

    But will anyone listen? The bullies within the Federal Government persist. Has the American culture come of age to where any form of bullying is no longer tolerated nor permitted?

    Any amount of high level radioactive waste that is NOT generated in Nevada should remain at the site of origin. Nevada is NOT (by voter proxy), nor ever should be, the waste dump for the nation. This is a case of state's rights (which the voters affirm the decision of "NO") versus irresponsible states pushing their incompetence through the Federal Government to avoid the consequences of ill-thought of decisions. Sorry, you made the waste, you deal with it in your state!

    Blessings and Peace,

  2. take the money and run. how much was allowed to be spent to create the place out in the middle of nowhere? Once that was all spent, we want to back out and say no thanks? erosion of 1st world civilization. giant wastes of money.

  3. Sad. Yucca Mountain is safe and could generate revenue and jobs for Nevada for years to come.

    Paranoid leftists trying to destroy it will hurt our state.

  4. BTW, who was the brain dead leftist that wrote this column?

    Demand money BEFORE we take it. That's all you have to do and your argument is toast.

  5. You make it, you store it. What's so hard to understand about that. Oh wait, you don't want to store it because....? Make a one billion dollar a day storage fee, and maybe the State will think about it (cash up front please).

  6. On the front page of Sundays RJ was a large picture and an article about the storage of nuclear waste in the NNSS facility. This facility is an open pit not designed to hold it for near eternity.

    Then in the Sun we have the usual agenda driven nonsense about Yucca Mountain, where this waste could be sealed far underground, surrounded by concrete and solid rock which and which was designed to safely hold nuclear waste for extreme periods of time.

    Somehow it makes more sense to put this stuff in a near impenetrable and indestructible facility, Yucca Mountain, designed specifically for this purpose than one intended only for temporary storage in an open pit.

    I wonder if the Sun has considered the irony here.