Las Vegas Sun

May 3, 2015

Currently: 73° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Opponents of campus carry bill say guns would make schools less safe

Backers of a bill to allow employees of school districts and Nevada's higher education system to carry guns on campus if they have a concealed weapon permit say the issue is about responding quickly to imminent threats.

But opponents counter having more guns would make campuses less safe. They add there are already procedures for employees with permits to ask permission of administrators to carry guns under special circumstances.

No action was taken Monday by the Senate Judiciary Committee on SB223, sponsored by Republican Sen. Joe Hardy of Boulder City.

The committee also heard two others bills to change concealed weapon permits. SB226 would allow people with permits to have it listed on their driver's license.

SB137 would abolish permits, allowing any to carry a concealed firearm.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Chunky says:

    He thinks having to ask administrators for permission is idiotic and unconstitutional.

    Most CCW permit holders want anonymity while carrying and the last thing you want is an out of touch administrator administering our constitutional rights.

    Chunky would rather beg forgiveness after he was forced to use deadly force than ask permission from some academicaholic who could very well say "no, I don't grant you the right to carry a weapon for the purpose of defending yourself or the innocent lives of others".


    That's what Chunky thinks!

  2. I wonder if "ChunkyFlyRight" could look up the stats on crime rates on campus versus off campus? All those guns in the surrounding communities just MUST mean there is less crime there than on those campuses. Right???

  3. Liability for any injuries, shock, etc. for accidental discharge, mistaken identity, bad or even good aim for that matter, would be with the School District, University or State.

    A person carrying a loaded gun for defense declares that they are competent to observe, judge and execute someone within a matter of seconds. In the event that their assessment fails - or is accurate, there will be a large financial liability that must be paid and it should not be the taxpayer.

    Therefore, this bill should also require the amateur shootist to carry at least $5 to $10 million in personal liability insurance while on Government property. If it does not, then the bill fails to protect the taxpayer from incompetence and should be dead on introduction.

    All concealed carry permits should require the holder to carry at least $2 million in liability and wrongful death insurance regardless of where they take their weapons.

  4. Sounds good SunJon, but you being able to post here should also require you to have at least $2 million of liability insurance to cover the potential that you could make a libelous statement. Sound fair?

  5. If a person is near you and is shooting at random people and you were cornered, would you prefer to have a gun or to not have a gun?