Las Vegas Sun

July 8, 2015

Currently: 89° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Assembly casts historic vote to expel troubled lawmaker Brooks


Cathleen Allison / AP

Assembly Speaker Marilyn Kirkpatrick, D-North Las Vegas, votes in an emotional and historic proceeding to expel Assemblyman Steven Brooks, D-North Las Vegas, at the Legislative Building in Carson City, Nev., on Thursday, March 28, 2013.

Updated Thursday, March 28, 2013 | 4:35 p.m.

Click to enlarge photo

Nevada Assembly Majority Leader William Horne, D-Las Vegas, hugs Assemblywoman Dina Neal, D-North Las Vegas, following an emotional and historic vote to expel fellow Assemblyman Steven Brooks on Thursday, March 28, 2013.

2013 Legislative Session - Assemblyman Brooks

Assemblyman Steven Brooks is sworn in along with the rest of the assembly on the first day of the 2013 legislative session Monday, Feb. 4, 2013 in Carson City. Launch slideshow »

In a voice vote masking how each individual lawmaker sided, the Nevada Assembly made the unprecedented decision to expel one of their own — troubled Assemblyman Steven Brooks, D-North Las Vegas.

The decision came after hours of closed door deliberations and a three-hour long closed hearing on the evidence surrounding Brooks, including his two arrests, an involuntary psychiatric evaluation, an attempt to buy a high-powered rifle and a string of erratic outbursts.

A majority of "yays" sounded in the chamber after several speeches, some tearful, on the reasons to expel him. Only a handful of "nays" were heard. A crying Speaker Marilyn Kirkpatrick then declared Brooks' seat vacant.

"The truth is we did not feel safe having him in this building," Assembly Majority Leader William Horne said on the Assembly floor just before the vote.

In a phone call with the Las Vegas Sun after the vote, Brooks declared himself an "open book" and ranted for about 45 seconds before hanging up.

"You tell those sons of bitches they are going to have to look me in the eye when they try to kill a crazy man again," Brooks said, adding that he was on his way to the Legislature. "I have never been crazy, but they are trying to drive me that way. They are all going to jail. I got all their secrets. If they put one finger on me, they are going to jail for five years. I am going to commit a Legal 2000 on William Horne as soon as I get there."

A Legal 2000 allows authorities to hold someone who may be a danger to himself or others. Brooks was taken in for mental health evaluation under the auspices of a Legal 2000 in January.

"How dare they?" Brooks told The Associated Press in a separate phone call immediately after the vote. "I've been convicted of nothing ... They won't let me testify at the Grant Sawyer Building, and they sent 100 police officers to arrest me.

"Let me ask you, how can they do that?" he added.

His lawyer, Mitchell Posin, said he was "disappointed" and surprised, "especially because I was recently told it wasn't going to be heard today."

Before the vote, Horne said an investigation conducted by the special counsel revealed Brooks is "volatile, prone to angry outbursts and" potentially violent.

Speaking for Republicans, Assemblyman Wes Duncan, R-Las Vegas, agreed, noting that Brooks attempted to buy a "a rifle with scope, night vision goggles and a bullet proof vest."

Assembly Democrats struggled late Wednesday with making a decision on the Select Committee's recommendation to expel Brooks from the Legislature.

The difficulty of that decision became apparent as some lawmakers openly wept and others sat quietly with somber expressions.

Only Assemblywoman Dina Neal, D-North Las Vegas, who sat on the Select Committee that investigated whether Brooks was fit to serve, explained that she would be voting against the expulsion. Her voice halted repeatedly as she gave her floor speech.

"Courage is something found. It’s not given," she said, adding that she has received emails calling her a racist for seeking to protect Brooks against expulsion. Both lawmakers are black.

"I cannot move for that action of expulsion. I cannot move for that action because I believe in the human form and all its frailties and faults. I also believe in the power of human recovery."

Both Horne and Duncan noted that Brooks hasn't appeared to be willing to seek help for his "mental health issues."

"There was paranoia, there was mood swings, there were violent outbursts," Duncan said. "There was a propensity for violence that I saw in those documents that would give everyone here pause.

"And there was no inclination from Brooks that there’s an understanding on his part that he needs help or that he’s moving in a direction of getting that help."

Horne said he has grown only more wary of Brooks.

"As I stand before you today, I do not feel any more comfortable than I did at the beginning of the investigation," Horne said. "I actually feel less comfortable. I did not receive assurances that he is capable of controlling his angry outbursts or that his outbursts will not become violent."

The Assembly vote came after a committee of three Republicans and four Democrats recommended Brooks' ouster following a three-hour hearing behind closed doors late Tuesday. In that meeting, the Select Committee reviewed two 25-page investigation reports and nearly 900 pages of backup material gathered by independent counsel Mark Ferrario.

Those reports have remained confidential and have not been shared with the public or with the lawmakers not on the Select Committee. The secrecy surrounding the proceedings concerned both Republican and Democratic lawmakers.

A two-thirds majority vote was needed to expel a member.

Also on Thursday, the Nevada Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit Brooks had filed challenging Horne’s decision to place him on administrative leave and ban him from the building.

The justices, however, decided not to delve into the actual question of whether Horne had the authority to issue such a ban. Rather, the court noted that Brooks sued the wrong entity. Brooks named the Legislature as the respondent in the case, not the Assembly.

Since the beginning of the year, Brooks has been arrested twice — once on accusations he threatened Kirkpatrick and a second time on charges of domestic battery and resisting an officer. He has also be involuntarily detained for a psychiatric evaluation, denied the purchase of a rifle by state authorities and kicked out of a Reno casino for causing a disturbance. Brooks also has exhibited erratic behavior at the Legislature before leaders made the decision to ban him from the building.

Kirkpatrick pointed out that information, which has been widely reported by news outlets in the past three months, is largely what lawmakers are using to form an opinion on whether to oust him.

"You've put a lot of information out there," Kirkpatrick told reporters after the caucus meeting. "Do (lawmakers) have to at some point trust their colleagues? We trust our colleagues all day long every day."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 7 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. How do you get a 2/3 vote on "yays and nays?"

  2. Comment removed by moderator. Inappropriate

  3. Oh grow up! Acting like a bunch of school yard children.

    What is this elementary school? Grow up! Get back to work! Stop wasting tax payer money!

    If this continues - I wouldn't be surprised Rethuglicans will benefit.

    BEHAVE YOURSELVES! Stop acting like children and get back to work!

    If you people put in as much work into Nevada's problems - as you have in dealing with this juvenile behavior - we wouldn't be in the mess we are in!

    Grow up! You are grown as men and women! Behave accordingly!

  4. Good! And thank you.

  5. Now you've done it, Here we go off to the races.

  6. Good decision.

    Now, let's move on.

  7. Seems like there are a few Commenters here who have never had to deal with a mentally ill person up close and personal in their lives.

    When a person is irrational, they are out of control, and can NOT be reasoned with, in any way, shape, or form. Their (mentally ill individual's) behavior is out of control. NO ONE can predict what that irrational person will do or say. That is vitally important to remember when we are discussing Steve Brooks.

    For their own protection, Lawmakers had to do the voting as they did, otherwise, they individually or collectively could become targets of violence by Brooks. It is certain that they were justifiably concerned with not only their own personal safety, but for the safety of their family and friends as well. "A ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure," as the saying goes.

    As we, the public, are witnessing events in the news media, Brooks' irrational behaviors are escalating exponentially as the hours fly by. Although no one, not even Brooks, can predict his next move, one thing is apt to occur, because now Brooks feels a sense of martryrism, being condemned, guilt, and worthlessness: Brooks will attempt to take his own life, or those around him. Certainly, I do NOT wish such a thing upon him or anyone, but it does fall within a given pattern that those who work in the mental health field would project.

    You must understand that each of us is "hard wired" differently, meaning, we individually have our own propensities. One of the dissenting votes, by Lawmaker Dina Neal, reveals her own hard wiring towards having limitless compassion (not necessarily sensible compassion). She could be classified as a type of compassionate zealot, and her political and social records would bear me out on that assessment. But unknowingly, she also becomes a target, because Brooks would reason that she didn't protect him enough and should suffer the consequences of insufficiently shielding him from the persecution of others and the media.

    Mental health knows no political party affiliation nor boundaries, although some Commenters here, seem to believe that it is so. Example: Cancer does not pick and choose victims according to political party.

    There has to be evidence when suggesting or proclaiming someone is unfit, mentally incompetent, or mentally ill, when trying to get those affected individuals help. It is NOT an easy process, and many rather not go through the hassle, wishing the problem would simply "go away," or "fix itself in time". That just doesn't happen.

    Our country's mental health system and mental health laws need fixing, our support, and most of all, sufficient funding. Intervention in mental health can not be half way, because we are dealing with a whole person. Please contact your Lawmaker asking them to improve and fund the mental health system. We all benefit when this happens.

    Blessings and Peace,