Las Vegas Sun

April 27, 2015

Currently: 79° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


This time, D.C. pols are fighting over … President Obama’s nominees

Sun coverage

Senate Republicans and Democrats are all but committed to a long summer’s fight over the speed at which President Barack Obama’s nominees get cleared through the Senate.

According to Republicans, the pace of things is fine. But according to Democrats, things aren’t moving fast enough — and some are starting to drop hints that if pushed, they might start rattling the sabre for filibuster reform again.

“It’s delay for delay’s sake,” Sen. Charles Schumer, a member of Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid’s leadership team, said last week of Republican behavior. “If they think they can win a debate over whether the Senate will change its rules, they might very well be mistaken.”

Republicans have objected, arguing Obama’s second-term nominees have been approved more quickly than former President George W. Bush’s were and accusing Democrats of fomenting a “culture of intimidation”: Do it our way, or we “blow the Senate up,” as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell put it.

Democrats are frustrated by what they see as Republicans’ overuse of the procedural filibuster — a threat to block a bill by talking it to death unless the Senate can come up with 60 votes.

Democrats this year toyed with the idea of making a rule change known as the “nuclear option” — have a vote, by simple majority, to allow only simple-majority votes.

But Reid got gun-shy and decided to strike a handshake deal with Republicans instead: He would allow them to bring up amendments to bills, and they would agree not to filibuster judicial and agency nominees. Now Reid’s dropping thunderous hints that his patience with that arrangement is running thin.

“The agreement we reached in January has done virtually nothing to alleviate the obstruction we have seen for five months now,” Reid said, listing the nominees who had encountered delays: Tom Perez, nominee for labor secretary (whose history working as a garbage collector to put himself through school clearly fascinates the majority leader); and Rob Cordray, who for 525 days has become the pawn in ideological fight over the National Labor Relations Board.

“We’re not picking a fight on any nomination,” Reid said. “We’re just saying this can’t go on.”

But it will likely go on, at least for a while, because the stakes are too high for Reid to push too far too soon.

Reid has pledged to clear the decks for the immigration reform debate as soon as Congress returns from Memorial Day recess. The Gang of Eight’s immigration bill cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee last week and is ready for consideration by the full Senate.

Immigration reform has been an elusive prize for Reid since he took over as majority leader of the Senate. This issue likely carried him to victory in his re-election race in 2010, and it’s the issue on which Democrats seem to have held sway over Republican hearts and minds — at least in the Senate — since the 2012 election.

In short, it’s not worth pitching the most perfect moment for immigration reform he’s ever encountered for another ornery round of sparring over procedural tactics.

“I am not going to do anything to interfere with the immigration bill,” Reid said last week.

But as soon as the immigration process is over — no promises.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. There is no way that Harry is going to "blow up the Senate" by mandating simple majority rule on nominations or anything else. What goes around comes around, and the Dems will not be the majority in the Senate forever. That's why "filibuster reform" never got off the ground in the first place.

    What should be addressed is needing 60 votes to pass anything in the Senate. It isn't in the Constitution, and is simply a part of the Senate's own "rules of order" for the Senate. It amounts to the same old same old: GRIDLOCK. Here's a better idea; lets "blow up the Senate" by DISBANDING IT. Nothing of any consequence occurs there anymore.

  2. "Turnabout is fair play" and the Dumbocrats are seeing that in spades! 8 years of stonewalling and filibustering George W.'s nominees were perfectly fine with them at that time in our history and now that the shoe is on the other foot, they cry like the weasels they are! Dumbocrats are very quick to try and limit the rights of those who oppose their Commie-lite agenda. The Constitution means little to them if it impedes their totalitarian goals. They want to limit speech, guns and dissension so badly, they cannot see the forest for the trees. So we have sickos such as Schumer and Reid leading the charge and a whole bunch of lemmings following them off the anti-Constitution cliff.

  3. If President Obama would quit nominating criminals there wouldn't be any fighting over the nominations.

  4. Now that we have clearly identified our current Presidency as "Nixonian," it's noteworthy to comment on how Nixon himself is the one who conceived of the "Nuclear Option" that Harry Reid is embracing.