Las Vegas Sun

November 26, 2014

Currently: 62° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

N.J. judge rules casino not liable in unshuffled cards case

Image

Wayne Parry / AP

The Golden Nugget Atlantic City, pictured here in 2012, won a ruling in a New Jersey court that it does not have to pay $1.5 million won by a group of gamblers who realized that the cards had not been shuffled, and it can move to recover more than $500,000 it already paid the gamblers.

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. — A casino does not have to pay $1.5 million won by a group of gamblers who realized the cards had not been shuffled, and it can move to recover more than $500,000 it already paid them, a judge ruled Friday.

The Superior Court judge ruled that because the cards had been unshuffled, that made the game of mini-baccarat in April 2012 illegal under state casino rules.

A lawyer for the Golden Nugget Atlantic City's parent company, Landry's Inc., confirmed Judge James Isman's ruling but had no immediate comment. A lawyer for several of the defendants declined to comment.

Fourteen players racked up $1.5 million in winnings over 41 straight hands when they realized the cards were coming out in a specific pattern. Many of them quickly upped their bets from $10 a hand to $5,000.

The problem was that a Kansas City playing card manufacturer that sold decks of cards guaranteed to have been pre-shuffled did not do so in this case. The company, Gemaco, admitted in court it had erred in providing cards to the casino.

The casino sued the 14 gamblers for the return of money paid out and seeking to be absolved of having to redeem the outstanding chips. The players countersued, alleging, among other things, that the casino illegally detained them.

The illegal detention claim remains pending.

A preliminary court ruling two years ago went against the casino, which said it would appeal. But hours later, owner Tilman Fertitta overrode his lawyers and said the casino would pay the remainder of the disputed winnings. That deal fell apart days later when some of the gamblers refused to dismiss their claims against the Golden Nugget.

In Friday's ruling, Isman dismissed a racketeering count against the casino.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy