‘Dictator Trump’: Clinton aims to recast race

By Alexander Burns, New York Times News Service

Sunday, July 31, 2016 | 2 a.m.

Democrats marked a decisive turn in their campaign against Donald Trump this week, moving to recast the 2016 race not as a conventional battle between left and right but as a national emergency that requires voters of all stripes to band together against a singularly menacing candidate.

Abandoning their standard critique against conservative Republicans, allies of Hillary Clinton argued that Trump was not merely another champion of right-wing ideas, deserving of rejection for his views on the environment or health care.

Instead, in an onslaught of astonishing ferocity led by President Barack Obama, they used their convention to portray Trump as a dangerously unstable figure and a friend of foreign despots like President Vladimir Putin of Russia. Some Democrats suggested that Trump might have authoritarian impulses of his own: Prominent in Clinton’s acceptance speech Thursday night was a pointed reminder that the U.S. system was designed to prevent the rise of a dictator.

In effect, Clinton and Democratic Party leaders signaled that they would seek to fight the general election, to some extent, in nonpartisan terms — as a clash between the broad mainstream of U.S. voters and a candidate they argue would put the nation in jeopardy.

David Boaz, executive vice president of the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, said that Democrats had picked up on an unsettling theme in Trump’s campaign. He said the attacks this week on Trump as an autocrat had the potential to resonate outside the Democratic base.

“I really don’t think that’s too over the top,” Boaz said. “We have one candidate who’s not even pretending — he is promising to be a one-man ruler.”

Clinton herself stopped short of denouncing Trump as an authoritarian. But in her convention speech — and on the campaign trail in recent days — she described his political worldview as being in profound tension with traditional U.S. values. That somewhat gentler argument, strategists close to Clinton said, will be central to her campaign in the general election.

She has rebuked Trump repeatedly for depicting the United States as a nation in decline and declaring, “I alone can fix it.” That sentiment, Clinton said, is inconsistent with democracy.

Clinton returned to that theme Thursday and said Trump’s proclamation should “set off alarm bells for all of us.”

“Remember,” she said, “our founders fought a revolution and wrote a Constitution so America would never be a nation where one person had all the power.”

Trump and his campaign have batted away suggestions that he holds anti-Democratic views. Paul Manafort, Trump’s campaign chairman, said Thursday that the Democrats’ fresh attempts to label Trump a dictator-in-waiting signaled desperation and were an effort to counter his rousing convention speech in Cleveland last week.

In that address, Trump offered himself to the country as a “law-and-order candidate” and a champion of working people in a nation under siege. Democrats, Manafort said, were trying to attack Trump to skirt responsibility for the conditions he is campaigning against.

But the attacks Democrats leveled in Philadelphia may not be so easily dismissed: Vice President Joe Biden said Trump was so unprepared and so divisive that he would put U.S. lives at risk. In an electric Wednesday night speech, Obama lumped Trump’s candidacy with violent ideologies that have spawned attacks on America.

“Anyone who threatens our values, whether fascists or communists or jihadists or homegrown demagogues, will always fail in the end,” Obama said. Americans, the president said, do not “look to be ruled.”

Democrats recruited respected figures from outside the party to amplify their appeal: Michael R. Bloomberg, the billionaire former New York City mayor, who is a political independent, warned that non-Democrats must rally with Clinton to stop a “dangerous demagogue.”

John Allen, a retired four-star Marine general, thundered into an arena dotted with American flags that voters faced a choice between Clinton and “a dark place of discord and fear.”

There is no recent precedent in U.S. politics for such unrelenting and direct attacks on a presidential nominee’s commitment to the basic institutions of democracy. Alvin S. Felzenberg, a historian and conservative columnist, said the latest point of comparison for this week’s Democratic barrage might be the 1940 election, in which Republicans savaged Franklin D. Roosevelt for defying tradition to pursue a third term as president. Even that, Felzenberg said, was “not with this tenacity and not at the conventions per se.”

But Trump has stirred concerns throughout the 2016 race, on the left and right, with a political approach and a set of policy prescriptions that plainly defy the norms of U.S. politics. He has campaigned on pledges to bar Muslims from entering the United States and to torture people suspected of terrorism. (Trump has recently suggested banning people from the United States based on their country of origin, although he has not ruled out a religious test.)

In Philadelphia on Thursday night, Khizr Khan, whose son, a Muslim and U.S. Army captain, was killed fighting in Iraq, stirred the convention crowd as he denounced Trump’s proposal, calling it an offense against the Constitution.

“Donald Trump, you’re asking Americans to trust you with their future,” Khan said. “Let me ask you, have you even read the United States Constitution?”

Trump has routinely praised autocratic foreign leaders for what he characterizes as their steely leadership abilities. He has hailed Saddam Hussein, the executed Iraqi leader, for his skill at maintaining power, and said of Kim Jong Un, the North Korean leader, “You have to give him credit” for consolidating authority. This week, amid reports that Russian-backed hackers had breached the Democratic National Committee, Trump said he considered Putin a superior leader to Obama.

Trump also said Wednesday that he hoped Russia would hack and release emails that Clinton deleted from her time as secretary of state. He said later that the remark was intended as sarcasm.

Manafort, the Trump campaign chairman, indicated that Trump would not back away from presenting himself as a rescuer for a nation in peril.

“The reason Donald Trump’s speech at the convention worked was because he was saying what people are feeling and thinking,” Manafort said in an email.

Trump’s emphasis on national strength, he said, is meant to hammer home that “weak leadership” from Obama and Clinton “is what caused the instability in the world that exists today.”

And Trump aides have argued that his defiant claim — “I alone can fix it” — has been distorted by Democrats. Trump, they say, aimed to present himself as the only available candidate who can turn the country around.

But Democrats intend to keep up their wall-to-wall assault on Trump’s worldview and fitness for office: Clinton surrogates will crisscross the country with the message that he is a singular threat, and a well-funded super PAC plans to beam the message into swing-state living rooms.

Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton’s communications director, said the campaign would hammer the message that Trump is “not a normal Republican.”

“He has an incredibly disturbing theory that at its core rejects the American values of both self reliance, and the value of community,” Palmieri said.

Geoff Garin, a pollster for Priorities USA Action, the main pro-Clinton super PAC, said the race had entered a new phase. A defining goal for the group now, he said, was to ensure that voters “reckon with what it would mean to have a dangerous demagogue like Trump as president.”

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy of Connecticut, chairman of the Democratic Governors Association, said Trump’s candidacy echoed the rise of fascism in Europe before World War II.

“Maybe this is an American version of that: Divide and conquer, marginalize as many as you can,” Malloy said just outside the conventional hall.

The Republican presidential nominee, Malloy said, should be cast as a “uniquely bad” force in U.S. politics.

“Whether he has evil purposes in mind,” Malloy said, “he is a dangerous man.”