Las Vegas Sun

March 29, 2024

Other Voices:

Now is the time to focus on health of planet

Many Americans felt sick Wednesday. The country they thought they knew doesn’t seem to exist. Many of them are worried in a way they never have been before. I share a lot of those worries.

But what now?

Here’s my immediate answer: No task has become more important than persuading a much larger number of Republicans that the health of the planet matters for their children and grandchildren.

Yes, of course there are other vital issues, especially the constitutional and civil rights that Donald Trump has at times disdained. And, yes, Democrats need to begin plotting their comeback for 2018 and beyond. Yet, we also need to recognize that the climate is like nothing else.

Most issues are part of the historical push and pull of politics. One side makes gains; the other can reverse them later.

The state of the planet is different. We can’t unmelt the Arctic or magically remove carbon emissions from the atmosphere. We make decisions today with which future generations must live. Already, we’re beginning to live with the consequences of climate change: Coastal flooding, heat waves and droughts all have become more frequent and damaging.

The potential future consequences — the likely future consequences — are awesomely frightening.

To take Trump and the Republican majorities in Congress at their word, they don’t care. But here’s the thing: Eventually, they or their successors will care. The damage from climate change will not spare Republicans. It won’t spare anyone.

Nothing matters more than finding ways to accelerate the arrival of the day when more Republicans do care.

For legal scholars, it means looking for the arguments and precedents to persuade Justice Anthony Kennedy that the government’s recent steps to reduce pollution are indeed constitutional (as scholars have so successfully done on other issues). Once Trump fills the Supreme Court’s open seat, presumably with a hard-core conservative, Kennedy becomes the swing vote on the climate.

For Democrats and climate activists, it means looking for other versions of Kennedy: Republicans, at the national and state level, who have a healthy fear for the planet’s future or who can plausibly be won over.

And for the rest of us, it means trying to understand many Americans’ skepticism about climate change. It is misplaced but honest. Most Americans are not shills for energy companies and their short-term profits. Yelling ever more loudly, or swamping them with ever more scientific detail, seems unlikely to do the trick.

Figuring out what can work — and what the rest of us can do about the planet in the meantime — is the most productive way to channel the heartsickness and anger so many people feel.

David Leonhardt is a columnist for The New York Times.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy