Las Vegas Sun

I am praising Obama and nobody cares.

I am re-evaluating his foreign policy skills.

He has said that he would strongly consider using military action if non-military options did not work with Iran.

I may swing my vote behind him now.

Obama did strongly suggest in the Fox News O'Rielly interview that he would used the military option if non-military actions did not stop Iran.

I may vote for him now.

Obama foreign policy skills are growing every day.

He strongly hints that he will use military actions if Iran does not react to non-military actions.

I am glad Obama is growing as person and as a presidential candidate.

He says if non-military options do not work then he will strongly consider military options to deal with Iran.

The Clinton years are a result of combination of a moderate Democratic President and a Republican Senate and House. I did not say that Clinton did not share for credit. They both get credit.

According to the offical agency that determines which time periods are in recession, they stated in an offical report that the recession started in Clinton's last quarter and continue into the Bush's first two quarters.

The last time there was a filibuster proof Democratic Senate and a Democratic controlled House and a Democratic President was during the Jimmy Carter years.

They had full control of government. They get full credit for interest rates near 15%, gas lines, high employment and a DOW that fell by a factor of 1.3x's.

Wooooooowweeeee.......Jimmy Carter and the Democrats were very successful managers of the economy...............lets go back to those days!!!!!!! Carter = Obama

Give Obama some more time.

He is growing as a person and a candidate.

If non-military options do not work then he is willing to use military options to deal with Iran.

I am giving Obama praise.

He is growing as presidential material.

If non-military options do not work then he sees military options as viable against Iran.

LOL...Kool-aid...Kool-aid.

Ralston: I hate conservatives and I think they are idiots and evil.

Koo-aid drinkers: You are a genius Ralston.

Clinton ruled mostly with a Republican House and Senate to generate that economy.

This Democratic Senate and House...just spends and spends and spends and spends....They are no shining example of fiscal respondibility.

Yes Obama wants to raise taxes on capital job creation investments.

The DOW started to take off during Reagen.

It was 780 in start of 1980.

By the end of 1993 it was at 3240.

It increased by factor of 4.1x's during Bush Sr and Reagen years

During Clinton's years it increased by a factor of 3.3x's

Both are good.

Under Carter the DOW went from 1005 to 780 which is a 1.3x's factor decrease.

At least Bush, who received Clinton's recession which start in Clinton's last quarter, had the DOW increase not decrease like Carter.

Obama has proposed a ton of new spending that many say are not paid for.

Obama has promise not to reduce the deficts by one cent.

McCain is going to cut spending not increase spending.

Palin has one of the highest approval ratings for a sitting governor in the USA.

In a Rasmussen poll she has a national approval rating this equal or slightly higher than Obama and McCain at 58%.

LOL...Biden rating is 48%.

According to early Nieslen ratings, more people watched McCain than Obama. Palin had 37 million watched and Obama 38 million.

Only 24 million watched Biden....you know... the guy that Democrats offically released his selection at 3:00 AM in the morning in a text message.......LOL

Are they ashamed of Biden or was the 3:00 AM text message a dig at Hillary?

18 million Democratic Primary voters voted against Obama even when it was apparent that he would win the nomination.

I would never say that Democrats are good at picking presidential material.......Kerry, Gore, Dukakis, Mondale and Carter......LOL that is not a measure of qualification.