Las Vegas Sun

I see Nance, the conspiracy theorist, now thinks Obama's COLLEGE TRANSCRIPTS are going to make or break his election?!?!?

LOL!

Poor guy, with Obama's presidency imminent, he's got nothing left!

Nance, August 18: "It gives $1.64 more a day to the middle class over McCain's plan."

In a day, Nance's projection for the Obama tax cut rose 3%.

Nance, August 19: "Obama plan for middle class folks earning between $35k to $70k will give $1.69 daily tax break over McCain."

Then, Nance's projection for the Obama tax cut rose a whopping 19% from his original estimate!

Nance, August 29: "She wants to give an extra $1.95 a day more in tax breaks than McCain to the middle class so that the middle class can buy cheesburgers....oops wrong again that is Obama"

Finally, it arrived at an increase of 21% from his original projection... just 15 days later.

Nance, September 2: "He wants to give us an extra $1.98 a day (Cheeseburger plan) in tax breaks over McCain while at the same time heavily increase taxes on job creation capitial investments."

At this rate, even with Nance's projections settling back around $1.95, things are looking better and better for Obama with Nance's projections.

Thanks Nance!

And Nance, please explain how taxing capital gains kills jobs. Obama wants to reset capital gains taxes to the same level as the Clinton administration, which CREATED millions of more jobs than the Bush administration, even with higher capital gains taxes.

Busted! You lose!

Oh it's good to be home!

Wrong, "the bs"! S.190 (2005) did go to the Senate floor, where it was died due to lack of Democrat support (Senate, need 60 votes). (222)

"On July 28, 2005, the Senate Banking Committee considered and reported S. 190, the "Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005." This bill would create a new independent regulator for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks (GSEs)."

"The Committee accepted a substitute bill authored by Banking Chairman Richard Shelby (R-AL). They disagreed to a Democratic substitute by Ranking Member Paul Sarbanes (D-MD). The Sarbanes substitute would have created an affordable housing fund based on the GSEs' profits, eased portfolio limits, streamlined program approval and increased the conforming loan limits for high cost areas. It failed 9 yeas to 11 nays, and the Shelby bill passed on a straight party line vote of 11 yeas to 9 nays."

"Chairman Shelby assured Democratic Senators that he would continue to work with them before the bill is considered on the Senate floor to try to come to some compromise language. NAR will continue to work with the Committee to address REALTOR priorities. The bill is not expected to gain full Senate consideration unless an accommodation can be made to attract support from Democrats. "
http://www.realtor.org/GAPublic.nsf/page...

"Jul 28, 2005: Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably."
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd...

The Hagel bill was never voted on.

A substitute bill, written by Shelby, was passed and NEVER HIT THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE. GovTrack proves this, NO DEBATE WAS SCHEDULED FOR THE BILL. It was neutered by YOUR PARTY.

You lose, Makz. You just utterly fail here. HAHAHAHAHA!

Why didn't the Republicans bring the bill to the floor? Too cowardly? Because it was a TOKEN GESTURE? Of course! Why didn't McCain sign on to Hagel's reintroduced version of the same bill in 2007? Too cowardly!

"Even Barry Obama's own website says that S.190 went to the floor, LOL! "
"The bill, the Federal Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act (S. 190), must now be considered by the full Senate. "

The REPUBLICANS never scheduled a vote on the bill, per GovTrack. They controlled the docket, Makz. You know this. Or, at least you should. LOLOL!

Here's a simple request: You said it went to the Senate floor. Find me a single reference to S.190 on the floor after July 28, 2005. You can't. The Republicans never scheduled it to be brought to the floor.

No, you claimed the Dems spiked THIS BILL, S.190. They did not. They voted against a bill written by Shelby! And that bill NEVER LEFT COMMITTEE!

S.190 NEVER CAME TO A VOTE IN THE COMMITTEE. Your claim that the Democrats voted against it is nothing more than a LIE.

McCain's co-sponsorship is meaningless, as he didn't sign on until AFTER S.190 was dead. That means NOTHING. After-the-fact support for a bill? That's GUTLESS. And let's not forget that YOU originally said that McCain had WRITTEN the bill, when he had not.

Furthermore, Hagel reintroduced the Fannie/Freddie regulatory bill in 2007, and guess who's name is NOT attached? McCain!
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd...

You absolutely LOSE this argument.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA!

No, you claimed the Dems spiked THIS BILL, S.190. They did not. They voted against a bill written by Shelby! And that bill NEVER LEFT COMMITTEE!

S.190 NEVER CAME TO A VOTE IN THE COMMITTEE. Your claim that the Democrats voted against it is nothing more than a LIE.

McCain's co-sponsorship is meaningless, as he didn't sign on until AFTER S.190 was dead. That means NOTHING. After-the-fact support for a bill? That's GUTLESS. And let's not forget that YOU originally said that McCain had WRITTEN the bill, when he had not.

Furthermore, Hagel reintroduced the Fannie/Freddie regulatory bill in 2007, and guess who's name is NOT attached? McCain!
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd...

You absolutely LOSE this argument.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA!

No, you claimed the Dems spiked THIS BILL, S.190. They did not. They voted against a bill written by Shelby! And that bill NEVER LEFT COMMITTEE!

S.190 NEVER CAME TO A VOTE IN THE COMMITTEE. Your claim that the Democrats voted against it is nothing more than a LIE.

McCain's co-sponsorship is meaningless, as he didn't sign on until AFTER S.190 was dead. That means NOTHING. After-the-fact support for a bill? That's GUTLESS. And let's not forget that YOU originally said that McCain had WRITTEN the bill, when he had not.

Furthermore, Hagel reintroduced the Fannie/Freddie regulatory bill in 2007, and guess who's name is NOT attached? McCain!
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd...

You absolutely LOSE this argument.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Haha! Nance is BUSTED!

From your own link, genius:

"The Committee ACCEPTED A SUBSTITUTE BILL authored by Banking Chairman Richard Shelby (R-AL). They disagreed to a Democratic substitute by Ranking Member Paul Sarbanes (D-MD). "

The REPUBLICAN-LED COMMITTEE didn't even consider the bill McCain co-sponsored!

Dems voted against a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BILL!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Nance, thanks for PROVING YOURSELF WRONG!

Haha! Nance is BUSTED!

From your own link, genius:

"The Committee ACCEPTED A SUBSTITUTE BILL authored by Banking Chairman Richard Shelby (R-AL). They disagreed to a Democratic substitute by Ranking Member Paul Sarbanes (D-MD). "

The REPUBLICAN-LED COMMITTEE didn't even consider the bill McCain co-sponsored!

Dems voted against a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BILL!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Nance, thanks for PROVING YOURSELF WRONG!

Haha! Nance is BUSTED!

From your own link, genius:

"The Committee ACCEPTED A SUBSTITUTE BILL authored by Banking Chairman Richard Shelby (R-AL). They disagreed to a Democratic substitute by Ranking Member Paul Sarbanes (D-MD). "

The REPUBLICAN-LED COMMITTEE didn't even consider the bill McCain co-sponsored!

Dems voted against a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BILL!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Nance, thanks for PROVING YOURSELF WRONG!

LOL, no proof, then?

Link the public record.

Give me the names of the Dems who should be shamed.

Prove it.