‘This experiment has failed’: House charts course to repeal health law

By Thomas Kaplan and Robert Pear, New York Times News Service

Saturday, Jan. 14, 2017 | 2 a.m.

WASHINGTON — The House cleared the way Friday for speedy action to repeal the Affordable Care Act, putting Congress on track to undo the most significant health care law in a half-century.

With a near party-line vote of 227-198, the House overcame the opposition of Democrats and the anxieties of some Republicans to approve a budget blueprint that allows Republicans to end major provisions of President Barack Obama’s health care law without the threat of a Democratic filibuster in the Senate.

President-elect Donald Trump, Speaker Paul Ryan and other Republican leaders face a much bigger challenge: devising their own plan to ensure broad access to health care and coverage while controlling costs. While their party is far from a consensus on how to replace the health care law — under which more than 20 million Americans have gained health insurance — they will need votes from Democrats in the Senate to enact a robust replacement plan.

Republicans have argued that Americans have been crushed by soaring premiums and other unintended effects of the law, which was adopted without any Republican votes.

“This is a critical first step toward delivering relief to Americans who are struggling under this law,” Ryan said, adding, “This experiment has failed.”

Democrats warned that repeal of the health law would cause hardship for millions of Americans and create chaos in insurance markets and in the health care system, which accounts for about 18 percent of the nation’s economy.

“If we go down this path, we won’t have repeal and replace,” said Rep. John Yarmuth of Kentucky, senior Democrat on the House Budget Committee. “What we’ll have is repeal and repent, because we’re going to owe a huge apology to the American people for the damage that we cause.”

Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., said: “There’s still no plan for what comes next, threatening massive disruption to the entire health care system.”

In the days before the House vote, some conservative Republicans, as well as moderates, expressed discomfort about signing off on the budget blueprint without having a clearer picture of how and when Republican leaders planned to replace the health care law. Nine House Republicans ended up voting against the budget measure Friday. No Democrats voted for it.

The Senate approved the same measure early Thursday by a vote of 51-48. The House and Senate votes this week — essentially procedural steps — represented the first of several moves that Republicans plan to make as they work to unwind the health care law.

In the coming weeks, they say, they will try to devise a replacement, working closely with Trump and his choice to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, Rep. Tom Price of Georgia.

Four committees — two in the Senate, two in the House — will write language repealing major provisions of the 2010 health law. The resulting legislation can be passed with simple majorities in both chambers, and will be immune to a Democratic filibuster in the Senate.

Then, Republicans say, they will pass one or more free-standing bills to replace selected provisions of the Affordable Care Act. In the Senate, where Republicans hold 52 seats, they will need help from Democrats to reach the 60 votes necessary to approve such legislation.

Trump voiced support this week for repealing and replacing the health care law “essentially simultaneously,” though it remained to be seen if Republicans in the Senate can win enough Democratic support to adopt a replacement for the existing health care law, given the need to reach 60 votes.

In the House debate Friday, Republicans and Democrats offered wildly differing views of health care and health insurance.

Rep. Jason Lewis of Minnesota, a first-term Republican, said he had firsthand experience with the Affordable Care Act.

“Minnesotans have seen their health insurance choices shrink while their premiums, copays and deductibles skyrocket,” Lewis said. “I should know. For the last, in fact, over five years, I’ve been in the individual market, and my own insurance premiums have nearly tripled, and I’ve gone through three insurers. Minnesotans have seen a 50 to 67 percent increase in the premium cost this year alone.”

The House Democratic leader, Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California, who helped engineer passage of the health law, defended it on Friday, saying that every American benefited.

“The Republicans are feeding their ideological obsession with repealing the ACA and dismantling the health and economic security of hard-working families,” Pelosi said. For six years, she said, Republicans have had the chance to put forth an alternative, but “we’ve seen nothing.”

Echoing their colleagues in the Senate, Democrats asked how Republicans planned to go about replacing the Affordable Care Act — a complex, arduous task, as Democrats know from their own experience developing and passing the health law in the first place.

“When you put pen to paper, all hell is going to break loose on your side,” said Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt.

Democrats also tried to draw attention to what they said would be the devastating consequences of repealing the health care law. Over and over, after a Republican member spoke out against the law, Yarmuth offered several data points specific to the member’s home state, including how many people would lose their health coverage.

Republicans, though, were eager to deliver on a central campaign promise.

“The public has rendered judgment on this health care law,” said Rep. John Shimkus of Illinois.

The differing views among House members Friday foreshadowed the acrimony that is all but certain in the weeks to come, as Republicans press ahead with their repeal efforts over Democrats’ strenuous objections.

Lawmakers have shown some creativity in trying to explain the wisdom — or lack of wisdom — in moving forward with a repeal.

On Friday, Rep. Drew Ferguson of Georgia, a freshman Republican, likened the health care law to a goat that had been let loose in a person’s home.

“Now for six years, that goat has been messing in and destroying my house,” he said. “I want to renovate my house, but before I can, I have to get the goat out of the house before it does any more damage. It makes no sense to start fixing up my house until we get the goat out.”

Voting for the measure Friday, Ferguson said, would get rid of the goat.