Las Vegas Sun

July 19, 2008

Richards CSN’s likely pick, pleasing higher ed chief

Looks like interim head will get nod after near-$100,000 search

Thu, May 1, 2008 (2 a.m.)

Michael Richards wasn’t the “warmest” or “fuzziest” candidate for the College of Southern Nevada’s presidency, in the opinion of university system Chancellor Jim Rogers. Nevertheless, Rogers thought Richards would be the best man for the permanent job — so much so that he encouraged Richards to apply.

It looks as if Rogers will get his wish. The Board of Regents is expected today to appoint Richards, CSN’s interim chief, as permanent president under a four-year contract.

Pending regents’ approval, Richards’ annual take will include a $210,000 salary, a $12,000 housing allowance and an $8,000 car allowance, Rogers said. Richards’ interim job pays $169,917 plus perks.

The deal would make him the highest-paid community college president in Nevada. Maria Sheehan, with a $198,000 salary, would be the next most expensive when she starts at Truckee Meadows Community College in late June.

Still, Richards’ predecessor made quite a bit more than Richards will. Richard Carpenter, who led CSN for three years, earned a salary of $279,072, including a $50,000 supplement paid by the college’s foundation.

Rogers said he will ask the foundation to add up to $50,000 to Richards’ salary in six months, after the chief has spent more time in the top job.

“Carpenter had a lot more experience as a president, and I think we took that into consideration,” Rogers said.

The search is projected to cost between $90,000 and $100,000, according to CSN Vice President of Finance and Budget Patty Charlton Dayar. Rogers and Regents Chairman Michael Wixom view that as a worthwhile expenditure.

“What it (the search) allowed us to do was get in some really good applicants and measure Mike Richards against them,” Rogers said.

In contrast, Regent Mark Alden believes commissioning a consultant to conduct the hunt was “an absolute waste of taxpayer money” because CSN ended up with the president it already had.

Alden said he realizes now that the approach should have been: “Put an interim in and wait a year and decide if you should start a search.”

And though the search consultant said she vetted Richards as much as all other candidates, and though Rogers and other higher education leaders said the search was competitive, some at CSN still feel the fix was in.

Three members of a search advisory committee that voted unanimously to support Richards report directly to him.

His contract as interim president initially stated he did not intend to become a contender for the permanent job. He applied anyway, and regents changed his contract to allow his candidacy.

“I personally was a little bit disappointed that the process got changed,” said Sue Smuskiewicz, president of CSN’s council for classified employees. The search, she said, “didn’t seem very transparent.”

Richards also will have to contend with the fact that many employees view him as one of the last vestiges of Carpenter’s administration. Carpenter, who hired Richards in 2005 to be vice president of academic affairs, was accused of cronyism by some groups at CSN.

Michael Green, a history professor who has been at CSN for about two decades, called Carpenter’s administration the “most morally bankrupt presidency” he has ever seen. And the fact that Richards came in under Carpenter makes him unpopular in some quarters, Green said.

“I don’t think the majority of the faculty hate (Richards),” Green added. “I think most of the faculty want him to do well. If he does well, we’ll do better. That said, that doesn’t mean that they’re thrilled with him. Some have very good reason not to be.”

Math professor Stan VerNooy is among members of the CSN community who said Richards did nothing in nine months at the helm to change the college’s top-heavy culture. Late last year, administrators blocked access to a blog critical of CSN leadership, saying contributors were encouraging violence.

Managers view CSN as a business, obsessing about balancing budgets and starting new programs, VerNooy said.

“I would like to see a president who realizes that his primary goal is to provide the best possible education for his students, and everything else is subsidiary to that,” VerNooy said.

Richards has said repeatedly that his focus is on students. And Green said Richards seems more interested in communicating with faculty than Carpenter was. The interim chief routinely sends e-mails to employees about budget cuts and other issues.

“In the years Carpenter was here,” Green said, “I never had the sense I had the foggiest notion of what might be going on. So in that regard, it’s an improvement.”

Discussion: 3 comments so far…

  1. Thanks to Professor Stan VerNooy for speaking up for us.

    I have always admired Professor Mike Green, but I don't think he understands the scope of damage that Mike Richards has inflicted upon the college. As to comparatively, Mike Richards was contacting the CSN faculty more - he was the VPAA and he had to come to those department and division meetings. Have you been to one of those meetings? Mike Richards demeans, threatens, lies to appeace faculty, but then denies what he said previously, in those meetings. The recent news announcement of births and deaths to the entire college is to find something to do for KC Howard, the new Helen Clougherty, another waste of taxpayers' money, even if it's from the office of the interim president but is no credit to Mike Richards.

    Let's call it like it is. Mike Richards has no more contact with faculty than Richard Carpenter. Even when Professor Rosenthal asked him about faculty interaction, he could only scramble to brag that he interacted with "faculty leaders". Those "faculty leaders" turn out to be huge disasters for the faculty they are supposed to represent. They are Mike Richards' henchmen. Mike Richards has no contact of faculty beyond those "faculty leaders". Please read what Professor VerNooy wrote about that other college presidents were able to tell student stories. Mike Richards doesn't know our faculty. He pretends he does, he called someone wrong first name, repeatedly, until that person had to correct him. What got me was, how Mike Richards acted like that person's best friend for a good minute, to all of us, until that person said, "Uh...Sorry...my name is not..." Richards would have got away if he didn't pretend so hard!

    I am disappointed that anyone should open his mouth and say, "I don't know if this person is bad...I personally haven't seen that...I see him being not as bad as the other person..." That, is diluting the intensity of a very serious subject that requires huge scrutiny, not warm and fuzzy small talks. Mike Richards' qualification should not have been small talks. There is no room for taking up the precious newspaper real estate to say if you don't know he is bad or not.

    Sorry for my blunt opinion, but if you know he is bad, say it. If you know he is good, say it. Do not bother with, "don't know if he is bad as some people said he was..." It is very hurtful to those who have first hand experience being persecuted by this lunatic Mike Richards.

    Thank you Regent Mark Alden. That's an honest opinion. It is a waste of taxpayer's money.

    Thank you Sue Smuskiewicz, president of CSN’s council for classified employees, to have the courage to express your dissatisfaction.

  2. As Chair of the Faculty Senate at CSN, I received many faculty comments supporting the recommendation of Dr. Michael Richards; he received broad faculty support in his previous positions at the college. A focus on students and quality academic offerings are high priorities for faculty. The appointment this morning of a permanent President positions the college to move forward in a positive and productive way.

    The faculty of CSN are proud of what they bring to their classrooms, and of the institution they have worked very hard to strengthen and support.

    I can be reached at judy.stewart@csn.edu

  3. I am a CSN faculty member and Judy Stewart does not speak for me. In fact, she speaks against me and all faculty members I know at CSN. Mike Richards does not enjoy a wide support at CSN.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Full comments policy.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

OR Create an account (It's free)

Calendar

Silva vs. Irvin

Silva vs. Irvin

( The Pearl at the Palms)