Las Vegas Sun

April 18, 2015

Currently: 65° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


Harry Reid accentuates the positive in final campaign push

Harry Reid

Harry Reid

Sun Coverage

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has returned to the state for a final campaign push in which he will attempt to persuade Nevadans to return him to office by not only scaring voters away from his opponent but also giving them a list of reasons to support him.

In a subtle shift from his campaign’s recent strategy of almost exclusively negative campaigning against his Republican rival, Sharron Angle, Reid has returned to the argument that the state needs him because of the powerful position he has in Congress.

At a campaign event here Wednesday, Reid paraded local elected officials — Republicans and Democrats — before the assembled media to support his argument that essential federal funding for infrastructure and social programs has flowed to their communities because of his position.

In a jab at Angle, who thinks the federal government should be dramatically scaled back and fulfill only those duties expressly enumerated in the Constitution, Reid argued it is his “constitutional duty” to spend federal money.

“Part of my constitutional duty is to do congressionally directed spending,” he said, pulling out a copy of the Constitution given to him by the late U.S. Sen. Robert Byrd. “I am vigorous in going forward with congressionally directed spending. I fight for it.”

It’s a difficult argument to make to an electorate that polls indicate is deeply concerned about federal spending.

Angle, who spent the day fundraising in Washington, didn’t pass up the opportunity to hit back.

“The voters of Nevada are ready to retire Harry Reid for exactly this reason: He spends too much of our money,” Angle spokeswoman Ciara Mathews said. “Nevadans know they can count on Sharron Angle to go to Washington and fight against the reckless spending that has led us to the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression.”

But Reid hopes the appeal of his argument is in its details. He pointed Wednesday to improvements at airports throughout the state, anti-methamphetamine grants in rural Nevada and funding for police officers. Reid said such money would disappear if Angle, a laissez-faire purist, is elected.

His pointed remark was the exception. Most of Reid’s rhetoric was free of the attacks his campaign has waged against Angle, largely on television, since June. Reid has hit her for stating senators aren’t responsible for creating jobs, her opposition to requiring insurance companies to cover mammograms and her push to eliminate Social Security — to name a few.

Those attacks have helped narrow the substantial lead Angle held after she won the Republican primary.

Reid defended the negative campaign, saying he has almost uniformly used Angle’s own words to attack her.

“All my ads are contrast ads,” he said. “I’m not making stuff up.”

Reid’s latest spot, however, accuses Angle of trying to repeal insurance mandates for mammograms when she was a state lawmaker. Angle actually proposed legislation to require mammogram coverage, and, although she claims to oppose such mandates, never sponsored legislation to repeal them.

The negative campaign followed efforts by Reid to reintroduce himself to Nevada voters through biographical ads and commercials highlighting his efforts on behalf of the state and its businesses. Those ads — including one in which an MGM Resorts International executive credited him with saving the financing for CityCenter — did little to improve his standing in the polls.

The negative advertising from both candidates — Angle’s latest series of ads accuses Reid of being the best friend illegal immigrants could have — has come with a price for Reid and Angle. More than half of the electorate views both candidates negatively. And a CNN/Time poll this week found 10 percent of likely voters opting for “none of the above” rather than voting for either candidate.

Reid has said he doesn’t need 50 percent of the vote to win and political strategists have speculated that a “none of the above” campaign will surface to aid the majority leader. It’s speculation Reid didn’t dispel when asked if he is telling voters who won’t vote for him to select none of the above instead of Angle.

“I want everyone to vote for me,” he said.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Fight against reckless spending? That's like saying "I'm against throwing live puppies and kittens into a blender". I have never heard Sen. Reid say "What the Hell... It's not my money, let's buy everyone some cool toys".

    I agree we need to stop the "Reckless" spending, both sides say they want to stop it, but neither side really will actually do it.

    I believe that was the reason Pres. Obama promised more transparency in Washington, but got his rear-end handed to him when he tried to make it happen. And all the Conservatives could do is whine "See, he didn't do what he promised", but the Conservatives were the ones fighting tooth and nail against it.

    I think Washington could get more done if there was some level of co-operation rather than the constant partisan bickering. There were times when I wished that Pres. Obama would have just pushed through the legislation he wanted and just told the Republicans "Bite Me", but he honestly wanted bipartisan support on bills that would benefit America. The only real proposal the Republicans came up with for Health Care and the Financial Crisis was to do Nothing. I would rather Washington would do something with good intent and fail than do nothing and fail anyway.

  2. ***Nevadans know they can count on Sharron Angle to go to Washington and fight against the reckless spending***

    Oh, sure...Nevadans can count on a freshman senator (and a loon at that) to accomplish big things in Washington...eliminating Social Security should be a real winner with other Congressmen, especially those with lots of seniors in their constituencies, don't you think? Morons.

  3. American Man/Philip Dunham:
    I completely agree with you. The Republicans brought America to the brink of financial ruin; trashed our international reputation; started two wars; ignored corporate corruption; eliminated many civil liberties; substantially increased the gap between the rich and the rest of us; and started blaming the mess on President Obama before he was even inaugurated. Since then they've thwarted him in every possible way: lying and dividing Americans, and brainwashing gullible people into hating our democratically elected government and wanting to overthrow it. That's treason.

    I partly blame the media for serving as a megaphone for every piece of Republican propaganda, in hopes of selling more advertising by adding fuel to the fire. This applies to the slander of Senator Harry Reid, a hardworking man who deserves a lot of credit.

    On November 2nd, we need to send a message to the Republicans that they DON'T represent us.

  4. Is there really anybody who is still undecided? Election day can't come soon enough.