Las Vegas Sun

April 17, 2015

Currently: 72° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Transportation expert says Las Vegas could become crossroads of West


LEFT: A model of a proposed Victorville station for the DesertXpress high-speed rail project is shown. RIGHT: Motorists navigate rush hour traffic on Interstate 15 near the Strip. (Las Vegas Sun file photos)

Click to enlarge photo

Tom Skancke, who envisions high-speed rail being built in Las Vegas, stands at the Interstate 215 underpass at Decatur Boulevard.

Las Vegas could become the crossroads of the West with a new Interstate 15 corridor study, a proposed Interstate 11 and planned connections to a high-speed rail network, a transportation expert said on Tuesday.

Tom Skancke, president of The Skancke Co. Ltd., told the Nevada Contractors Association at a lunch meeting that there are challenges in developing transportation infrastructure, including how to pay for it, but the potential reward is economic diversification for the region.

“This is probably the most important critical issue to our nation’s long-term economic sustainability,” Skancke told about 100 association members gathered at the Rio.

Skancke said the Nevada Department of Transportation recently awarded an I-15 corridor study. A similar project was undertaken for Interstate 95 from Florida to Maine. The purpose of the study is to develop expansion and improvement strategies for the length of the highway.

The study will include I-15 from San Diego to Salt Lake City. Skancke said Idaho and Montana did not opt to participate.

Skancke said a section of I-15 in Southern California illustrates why communities along the highway need to work together.

“When the I-15-Interstate 215 intersection in San Bernardino County fails, the whole system fails,” he said.

He said the intersection was designed in 1958 to carry 15,000 vehicle trips a day. Today, the intersection handles 122,000 truck trips alone, serves 65,000 residents of Victorville on their trips to the Los Angeles basin and is a conduit for about 11 million visitors a year to Southern Nevada.

“It is the most significant intersection in all of the West,” Skancke said. “In the past, we have looked at (the cities along I-15) as competition. Today, we need to look at them as complementing us as partners.”

Another highway transportation project that would affect Las Vegas’ future is a proposal to upgrade U.S. 93 and U.S. 95 to interstate highway standards. The proposed I-11 would run from Phoenix to Seattle, and I-15 would become an important intersection.

The proposal takes on added importance with China’s emergence as the world’s dominant economic power.

China has invested in deep-water ports at Punta Colonet, Baja California, and Lazaro Cardenas, Michoacan, to import goods to North and Central America. Southern California ports can’t accommodate most of the new supercargo ships, Skancke said.

A third infrastructure component is high-speed rail.

Skancke was one of the engineers of the Western High Speed Rail Alliance, which includes transportation organizations in Las Vegas, Phoenix, Denver, Salt Lake City and Reno.

He said the alliance is working as a single entity to develop a high-speed rail network and apply for funding for the West. Intermountain western states were shut out when the federal government doled out $8 billion in high-speed rail stimulus funds.

Skancke said the alliance avoided being involved with California’s high-speed system because it didn’t want to get entangled in the state’s political issues. But the alliance has done more in one year than backers of the Pacific Northwest’s proposed Cascadia high-speed system between Vancouver, British Columbia, and Eugene, Ore., has done in 20 years, he said.

While Las Vegas has the potential of becoming a center of transportation in the West, Skancke said, there are huge obstacles to overcome. The largest may be changing the planning mindset, a major cultural shift.

“Our problem is that we react; we don’t plan,” Skancke said. “We’re really good at crises and wars. We’ve got those two things down pat. But if we don’t declare war on this transportation crisis, we won’t have anything to react to. It’s that serious. Someone needs to stand up and say, ‘Here’s the vision for the future of our country.’”

At the root of the issue is money, and Skancke said the nation needs a long-term stable funding source.

He proposes an increase to the fuel tax, the implementation of congestion management and tolling, and a study on implementing a vehicle-miles-traveled use fee.

Skancke said increasing the fuel tax by 3 cents a gallon would generate more than $200 billion a year.

“We need about $225 billion a year on the low end just to sustain the current system,” Skancke said.

Experts have talked about congestion management and tolling, but Skancke acknowledged that “it just never gets there.”

Congestion management and tolling have been proposed as private-sector investments in highway systems.

Congestion management involves charging motorists a fee to use special lanes when traffic is heavy. Tolls generate revenue from any motorist choosing to use a toll highway.

Vehicle-miles-traveled use fees, or VMTs, are a fix for the inevitable wave of issues that will arise as more motorists shift to energy-saving electric vehicles.

Skancke believes that state and federal governments need to think ahead about the impact electric vehicles will have on gasoline-tax revenue.

“Somebody has to champion a VMT,” Skancke said. “Without it, we have no way of sustaining our highway trust fund.”

Skancke said the National Car Rental chain intends to purchase 500 electric vehicles and station 100 of them in Las Vegas.

“To my knowledge, there are only four places to plug in a car in Las Vegas, and all of them are at CityCenter,” he said. “If companies like National are going to start plopping these vehicles into cities, the reality is that we should start capturing that fuel tax.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 5 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Our country would be much better off if we choked down the flow of cheaply made imported goods from China that arrive at our nations ports and are than transported along our nations highways such as I-15 through Las Vegas.

    And the Author of this article wants to make it easier than it already is for China to flood our markets with cheap foreign goods..

    Whose side is this guy on anyway ?

  2. <This is just what America needs, another failed railway system like Amtrak>

    Amtrak is NOT a failed railway system. In fact, Amtrak does quite well and is planning more routes.

  3. Amtrak Facts:

    Created by Congress in 1971 to provide intercity train travel, Amtrak has never recorded a profit while receiving more than $40 billion in federal funding since its inception. In 1997, under pressure from the Clinton administration and Republicans in Congress, Amtrak promised to pay its own bills by 2003 through cost cutting and introduction of the Acela.

    Amtrak never met that deadline, and its executives have had to ask for government subsidies every year since then.

    Yep, it does well as long as Taxpayers keep throwing money at it.

  4. Just build the rails, extend the monorail, add a couple stadiums.

    I'm tired of all these na-sayers. Move to Boulder City if you don't want anything to change.

  5. gbigs: You are so wrong on so many levels. Why don't you move from under that bridge you're living at to another town.