Las Vegas Sun

April 19, 2014

Currently: 69° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Education:

Council puts finishing touches on revamped teacher evaluation system

Image

Sam Morris

Clark County School District teachers take part in the Visions Summer Institute Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at UNLV.

A state-level committee on Friday released its final recommendations for a new way to evaluate the state’s public school teachers.

Research has shown that the quality of instruction is a major driver of student performance. That's why Nevada legislators passed a law in 2011 that called for a new four-tiered evaluation system that would rate educators "highly effective," "effective," "minimally effective" and "ineffective." Currently, teachers are rated either "satisfactory" or "unsatisfactory."

For the past 15 months, the Teachers and Leaders Council — composed of 15 educators, parents and policymakers — has been drafting the framework for a revamped evaluation system for teachers and school-level administrators. Preliminary rubrics and models will be presented Jan. 14 to the state school board for final adoption, with pilot programs scheduled by June.

Half of a teacher's evaluation will be based on student achievement as measured by test scores, according to state law.

The council recommended that student growth — how much a student improved on tests — would be worth 35 percent. Reducing achievement gaps between different student groups would be worth 10 percent, and student proficiency is worth 5 percent.

"Most of (the evaluation) should be on student growth because regardless of where (students) are when they come into the classroom, teachers have an obligation to move them forward," said Rorie Fitzpatrick, state deputy superintendent and council member. "We want to grow them more quickly."

The remainder of the teacher's evaluation would be based on best teaching practices.

Instructional practices — such as building lesson plans on previous lessons, engaging diverse students and using test data to drive instruction — would be worth 35 percent. Other professional responsibilities, such as engaging families and student survey results, are worth 15 percent.

The administrator evaluations are based on a similar framework, but one that stresses leadership skills. As with teachers, 50 percent of an administrator's evaluation would be based on student test scores.

State education officials were adamant this new evaluation model was not meant to be punitive. Rather, it's a way to identify low-performing teachers and help them become better educators with more professional training. Eventually, this model most likely would be used to reward high-performing teachers with bonuses.

"We've missed the boat if this is about getting rid of bad teachers," Fitzpatrick said. "We want to build systems that are fair and don't punish teachers."

Even with the basic framework for a teacher evaluation system created, much work remains.

The state school board must create a data collection system from which to evaluate teachers. The board will need to create rubrics for teacher and principal evaluations and determine the frequency and length of observations.

"If we have a bad set of data, then we're going to get bad results," Fitzpatrick said.

Evaluators — most likely principals and vice principals — also would need significant training to evaluate their staff uniformly and effectively.

To comply with the new state law, the teacher evaluation system must be in place by next school year. However, the council remained cautious about moving too quickly, recommending that the school board do yearlong studies to validate evaluation results.

Nevada must tread carefully to avoid botched evaluation systems.

One Florida district issued thousands of evaluations only to revoke them hours later after the system was found to be flawed. In the Houston Independent School District, merit pay for thousands of schoolteachers were doled out based on faulty evaluations, prompting district officials to request that teachers return their bonuses.

"We need to make every effort to avoid that," Fitzpatrick said. "When we stand this thing up, we need to believe in it."

Challenges remain, however, for the fledgling evaluation system.

Currently, only a quarter of the 25,000 teachers in Nevada have student assessments related to their subjects: reading, math and science in grades 3-8 and 10.

The council recommended that portfolio reviews, student surveys and peer assessments could be used as well as observations.

The state board also must wrestle with how evaluators will be selected and how they will be trained to remain impartial.

The council recommended the state look into hiring consultants to oversee this process and develop a "cadre of peer reviewers."

Finally, reviewing thousands of teachers and principals — even if it's not on an annual basis — will be a major undertaking.

State Superintendent Jim Guthrie calculated the annual cost to be upwards of $20 million, with around 14 hours of observation per teacher.

"This is such a poor state, we don't want to throw $10 million-$20 million away and do it wrong," Guthrie said. "We want to be the first state to get it right, fair — and spend these dollars wisely."

Community leaders applauded the council on Friday for its work. Some offered suggestions for improvement, particularly around how the new teacher evaluation system would help minority students. Others called for evaluation systems to be created for school boards and districts, as well.

Ellen Holmes, the director of professional learning for the local teachers union, said she was grateful for union representation on the council.

However, she raised several concerns about the limited state support and the quick timeline in which this evaluation system is being put into practice. Holmes also was worried about how evaluators would be selected.

"This could lead to a high-stakes, high-stress situation," she said. "We don't want that in our schools."

UNLV law professor Sylvia Lazos said the new evaluation system ought to better measure growth among English Language Learner students.

"If we want to improve, we need to measure how teachers are working with our ELL students," she said.

Jose Solorio, who represents the Nevada Latino Democratic caucus Si Se Puede, said he was concerned the new teacher evaluation system would increase the teacher diversity gap. Solorio said he feared quality teachers would flock to more affluent and higher-performing schools that could better their chances of earning a positive evaluation.

"Teachers are leaving at-risk schools, and this would do nothing (to change that)," Solorio said. "We need to address diversity issues. Otherwise, we're failing the minority and Latino students in Nevada."

Guthrie argued the new teacher evaluation system was a matter of providing quality teachers to the most disadvantaged students in the most at-risk schools in Nevada.

"Without this mechanism, we don't have the capacity to reallocate our resources — the most effective of which is the teacher — to poor and the most discriminated against minorities," Guthrie said. "This is the civil rights issue of the 21st century. We can't make this a fair and just society if we don't put the resources in front of the students who need them the most."

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Of course it's all up to the teachers. It certainly doesn't matter whether the kids have parents, or a warm meal at home, or even whether some nut has access to weapons to kill a few dozen people now and then and therefore they can't feel at ease on a playground or in a classroom. But why deal with those problems when we can screw teachers?

  2. The latest trend in education is the flight of teachers from the classroom to administrative positions. Add into the mix, Specialist teachers in the fields of P.E., Art, Music, and Library also going into administration (who will be eventually "evaluating/rating" regular classroom teachers. It leaves a thinking person to wonder why would that be?

    Other concerns about this new mandated evaluation system, is how those working in the classrooms of at-risk schools and teachers working with our Special Education students will be assessed.

    There is a lot of grumbling going on with this new push to get "coaches," "learning strategists," and "instructional strategists" into our schools, but how much time do they actually spend in the classrooms versus being out going to "meetings" and how are THEY going to be evaluated???

    It is fair for taxpayers to expect the best bang for the buck, and hold public servants accountable. Typically, those in administrative positions are earning six figure incomes, whereas those facing our students each and every day in the classrooms are locked into five figure incomes and plenty of after hours work unpaid.

    Outside of the routine teaching of core academics, teachers are usually the first responders to student behavioral problems and concerns. Increasingly, administrators appear to be unavailable (either off campus or behind the closed doors), and the load to attend to behaviors and concerns are being devised to shift more, not less, responsibility to teaching staff, besides the teacher's duties of providing quality instruction.

    So as we have these conversations about the legislated teacher and adminstrator evaluations, let's put all the cards on the table, let's open this up for the public to not only become informed, but be invited to truly participate in the process. Nevadans own the educational system they have via paying taxes, personal involvement (or lack thereof), and Nevadans should do what they can to make it better and what they envision it to be.

    Give the gift of your time, energy, and presence at your neighborhood school that serves your children or grandchildren. Please consider volunteering at a school near you, be involved, model what you expect the children now there should be doing in the future. Students feel your care and concern, and it translates into positive outcomes as with increased motivation and academic performance and appropriate behaviors. Thank you!

    Blessings and Peace,
    Star

  3. Solorio is exactly correct! None of this addresses the fact that there are no incentives for experienced teachers to stay in the inner city schools. We need financial incentives for quality teachers to drive across town to work in some of our oldest and most difficult schools. Until this problem is addressed, inner city CCSD schools will be filled with first year teachers, teachers kicked out of turnaround schools, and long-term subs. How can we be surprised that there is an achievement gap in CCSD when the system is designed with such inequity for our students?

  4. Could we add some criteria for behavior? No more video of teachers screaming at people even from union activities. No more teachers disrupting public meetings. p.s. Hugapug: There are incentives for teachers at poor-performing schools--I helped draft the legislation that passed in 2000 or so--20% extra credit for retirement.