Las Vegas Sun

July 5, 2015

Currently: 93° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

Breaking News: U.S. leads Japan 5-2 in Women's World Cup


Democrats start to back off of mining


Steve Marcus / FILE

A cable shovel dumps gold ore into a truck in Crescent Valley in September 2001. In Nevada, mining companies get a slew of tax deductions, including for equipment depreciation.

Mining came out of the Legislature in 2011 on the ropes. Led by Senate Democrats, the Legislature limited mines’ tax deductions, instituted a new mining oversight committee and took the first step to rip the industry’s tax rate out of the state’s constitution by passing Senate Joint Resolution 15.

But now, elected Democrats and candidates are taking a softer approach to one of the state’s major industries, which also contributes heavily to both Democratic and Republican campaigns.

Click to enlarge photo

Sen. Mo Denis asks a question during a meeting of the Senate Finance Committee on the second day of the 2011 legislative session Tuesday, Feb. 8, 2011, in Carson City.

Take, for example, Sen. Mo Denis, who’s in line to be the leader of the caucus next year: “We understand they play an important role in the economy here in Nevada.”

He said the joint resolution, which passed in 2011 and has to pass again in 2013 before going to voters, is not on his radar screen.

“I don’t know where I’m at with that,” said Denis, who voted with all other Democrats and a handful of Republicans to pass the resolution in 2011. “Other issues are more pressing than that type of issue. When it comes to education, the economy, jobs — those will be more of a priority than that.”

Justin Jones, the Democrat running for a contested senate seat in Southwestern Las Vegas, said he has talked to both sides on the issue.

“My visceral reaction is, ‘Why is mining deserving protection in the constitution?’ But if we simply took the provision out of the constitution, mining companies would pay less in taxes,” he said in an interview last month. “That’s not the result that we’re looking for.”

That assertion — that SJR15 would result in them paying less taxes, without an alternative — also is one of the key talking points of the mining industry. (Advocates for the bill call it a catch-22: They can’t pass a different, higher tax on minerals because of the constitution but can’t change the constitution because there’s no alternative in place.)

The legislation on mining had been one of the few bright spots for liberals in 2011. It was a salve on an otherwise frustrating session for the left, which saw the 120 days largely dictated by Republican Gov. Brian Sandoval, despite Democrats controlling both the Assembly and Senate.

The prospect for tax increases once again is dim for the 2013 Legislative session, and it’s not clear what Democrats will have to offer to their base of supporters.

In many respects, the mining issue became front and center because of Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford, D-North Las Vegas. He has left to seek a seat in Congress, so it’s natural that there would be less enthusiasm for the issue.

But some see the influence of campaign money also playing a role.

Click to enlarge photo

Nevada Sen. Sheila Leslie, D-Reno, and retired Nevada state archivist Guy Rocha listen to testimony on Leslie's proposal to strip the mining industry of eminent domain powers Monday, Feb. 14, 2011 at the Legislature in Carson City.

Former Sen. Sheila Leslie, who resigned her Reno seat to challenge Sen. Greg Brower, R-Reno, has been another vocal critic against mining, arguing the industry doesn’t pay its fair share. She, too, has shifted her focus away from singling out mining to a broader criticism that corporations in general don’t pay enough.

“Large campaign contributions often have the effect of creating amnesia on mining,” she said. “It’s not surprising at all to me that during campaign season, no one wants to address the core issues around mining.”

Leslie added it would once again be a tough battle in 2013.

“I’m not optimistic about winning,” she said, adding that she would bring it up again.

As it has in past years, mining has been generous in spreading around campaign money to both Democratic and Republican candidates.

While the companies have given to Brower and not to Leslie, they haven’t given the jaw-dropping sums to political action committees working to swing the Senate Republican like other companies have.

Newmont and Barrick gave a combined $50,000 to Gov. Brian Sandoval’s political action committee, the New Nevada PAC, which is spending money in the state senate races. But that figure was dwarfed by $100,000 contributions to the PAC from MGM Resorts International, Las Vegas Sands and Station Casinos.

Wynn Resorts also gave $475,000 to a national Republican group that is playing in the five competitive seats.

Barrick also gave $75,000 to the Nevada Democratic Party.

“Our campaign contributions have been modest,” said Tim Crowley, president of the Nevada Mining Association. “They have been consistent year over year. It’s a recognition legislators have expenses, they need to communicate with constituents.”

He said the industry has been and remains neutral on the resolution that could lead to the net proceeds on minerals tax rate being removed from the constitution.

The industry has been waging a public relations campaign and speaking to groups about mining. Crowley said his industry is focused on improving the workforce and changing the perception of the industry.

Crowley said the message aimed at lawmakers hasn’t really changed. But while they may have failed to get it across in the final frenzied days of the legislative session, they’ve been able to use the interim to ensure it’s been heard.

“It’s just time,” he said of getting the industry’s message across. “I think that in the last days of the session, it didn’t resonate.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. It doesn't matter if there is an R or a D after someone's name when it comes to selling out to mining in this state. They can all be bought.

  2. Fire all the Bumb in office today, they are not doing what they should to support the needs of the people.

    There is too much lost revenue for the future of Navads young, they need the support and so do the elderly in the state.

  3. Nevada's Mining Industry enjoys far too many privileges. Best illustrated by continuing major oversight failures by NV State officials. Remember NV state tax commission director Dino DiCianno retired abruptly after announcing his dept. did not audit NV Mining Industry as required. See> http://nevadastatepersonnelwatch.wordpre...

    Other failures in Nevada Mining oversight continue with MSHA and NV Mine Safety and Training Section to investigate timely filed formal complaint/violations of Safety, Health, harassment, racial discrimination and manufacturing false records. Who do NV safety oversight regulators protect, not the working shift miner who never has formal complaints investigated?

    Water Pollution Control Permits issued to NV mining operation/operators by NV Division of Environmental Protection also is a flawed in favor of polluters/taxes. After a NOTICE OF DECISION -- Bureau of Mining Regulation and Reclamation an appeal must be filed within 10 days. When appeal is timely filed with evidence provided, the Nevada Mining Protectionist games begin. Another form 3 is sent to be filled out even after NV DEP/SEC state in meeting minute's new form 3 is not perfected and still being worked on? Rather than set a date for appeal hearing NV DEP/SEC run to NV Attorney General for an opinion to deny a hearing contrary to Public safety , MSHA , NV MSATS, NVDEP stated goal of protecting the public?

    There continues major efforts by MSHA, NV MSATS, NVDEP, backed by present and past NV governors' current NV Attorney General to block all efforts to right the wrongs in Nevada's mining industry"

    NDEP/SEC (STATE ENVIROMENTAL COMMISSION) as well as NV Attorney General is NOW on record as protecting major Mining Corp. over health and safety issues, i.e., chemical spills and production errors flowing into a children's playground (Water Pollution Control Permit NEV0070005). This is how blatant and broken Nevada Mining oversight really is/continues. Apparently the safety of Mining Corporations bottom line and taxes paid to the state of Nevada take priority over the health and safety of Nevada's miners and innocent young children playing in a toxic polluted playground". PRupp B125 SP NV 89047

  4. Having personally experienced a NV State Board of Equalization member of the mining community hear and rule against my property tax appeals ... talk about hypocrisy