Las Vegas Sun

April 27, 2015

Currently: 61° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


Southern Nevada lawmakers determined to halt shortchanging of Vegas students


Paul Takahashi

Wright Elementary School fourth graders Lillian Prince, 9, and Abraham Arias, 9, work on a writing assignment on Wednesday, Sept. 26, 2012.

Nevada Democrats may be loath to engage in a battle to raise taxes, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they are afraid of picking a fight — particularly when it comes to education.

This session, they’ve decided to engage in a long-awaited battle: the north-south war over how public schools divvy up state funding.

Democratic leaders have said achieving “funding equity” is their top priority. Technically, that means ditching the decades-old funding formula that favors sparsely populated counties in favor of a “weighted funding formula” that directs more funding to districts with large populations of students in poverty, learning English as a second language or in gifted and talented programs.

In reality, that means diverting state funding from Washoe and rural counties to Clark County — which has been historically underfunded on a per-pupil basis.

Senate Majority Leader Mo Denis, D-Las Vegas, said achieving funding equity is key to the rest of the Democrats’ education initiatives — including reduced class sizes, expanded full-day kindergarten and creating a pre-kindergarten program for at-risk students.

“Our kids are being disadvantaged in Clark County as opposed to everywhere else in the state,” Denis said. “We really need to look at that and do what is best for all of our kids, which includes Clark County.”

For decades, Northern Nevada has wielded outsized political power in the Legislature, even as the state’s population might has moved to Southern Nevada. Term limits have eradicated that northern power imbalance by emptying the Legislature of veteran Northern Nevada lawmakers who controlled much of the process.

Perhaps most important to that equation is the absence of former Senate Majority Leader Bill Raggio, who almost single-handedly blocked funding reform during his tenure in Carson City.

Democratic leaders from Las Vegas apparently have made the calculation that now is the time to level the playing field.

But they have a new northern foe to contend with — Gov. Brian Sandoval, who hails from Reno.

According to state Superintendent of Public Instruction Jim Guthrie, the governor has no appetite to engage in the funding equity fight this session. Instead, Guthrie said Sandoval plans to convene a working group of education stakeholders in Nevada, as well as national funding formula experts, to craft a new formula.

But he won’t do it until September, months after the 2013 legislative session ends, Guthrie said.

“The governor absolutely agrees this is important,” Guthrie said. “The current formula is so complicated more people in this state could explain Einstein’s theory of relativity than could explain how the schools are funded.

“This is a big deal. But to be able to craft something in the next three to four months, color me skeptical that it can happen.”

Denis disputes that.

A special committee of lawmakers spent the past two years studying the issue. A consultant’s report from that committee recommended Nevada move to the weighted funding formula. It’s the second consultant’s report to make the recommendation.

Nevada is 1 of just 14 states that don’t consider low-income students in its funding formula and 1 of only 3 states that don’t consider the cost of educating English language learners.

Simply recalculating how existing funding is distributed, however, would benefit some counties and hurt others.

According to one example in the consultant’s report, Clark County could stand to see a 6 percent increase in funding under a weighted formula. Washoe County would lose 2 percent, and Eureka County would lose almost half of its education funding.

“If a bill reaches the governor’s desk that treats everybody fairly and doesn’t have a whole lot of hurt districts, I would advise he sign it," Guthrie said. "But if it reaches his desk and one or two counties benefit and 15 are hurt, I would advise he not sign it.”

Education officials from across the state have worked to present a united front on the funding equity issue. Clark County Superintendent Dwight Jones and Washoe County Superintendent Pedro Martinez said they would not support a new formula that would take money away from other counties.

Instead, they’d push to expand the entire pie with additional revenue — a difficult scenario considering Sandoval has said he will veto any bill increasing taxes.

Still, Denis is determined to address the issue this session, whether Sandoval wants to engage or not.

“We obviously get to do the things we think are important during session,” Denis said. “This is something we are going to take up. We can’t ignore it. We don’t need anymore studies. We don’t need anymore panels.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Guthrie sounds like a guy who uses the "figures lie, liars figure" school of math. Fifteen counties [with a total population of???] will suffer horribly for the sake of one. So don't take away from the 15, raise the one to the same level playing field.

  2. Well said and point taken, Commenter Chuck333, with, "Northern Nevada has always received more tax dollars than Southern Nevada. Southern Nevada has carried the weight of this state but yet it seems that Northen Nevada rules the roost. I'm all for a more balanced approach and find it hard to believe that low income staudents are not figured in the formula.
    Another suggestion to Mr. Denis is since you are all for raising taxes why don't you go after the casinos and mining and make them pay their fair share? Maybe Mr. Denis is afraid to ruffle feathers?????"

    As a resident of both White Pine County (Northern rural), and Clark County (Southern Nevada), I can attest to the better quality of education thanks to increased funding the North has, as compared to the South.

    This is what our Nevada Lawmakers need to address, "Nevada is 1 of just 14 states that don't consider low-income students in its funding formula and 1 of only 3 states that don't consider the cost of educating English language learners."

    The problems of poverty and trying to educate English language learners, is of great importance. The barriers for these children towards input (attendance and receiving instruction), retention of information (practicing, and applying what they learned), and the ability to comprehend (understanding, without the distractions of their home life and cultural differences) put these children in a place of always "catching up" and can, with great resolve, be on grade level. We have to deal with responsibility on many levels, which includes how we fund, and also placing incentives so that those who are parents of such children, are held accountable for their child's welfare, care, security, and safety. A parent is a child's first and lifelong teacher, not the government.

    During this next Nevada State Legislative Session, Lawmakers need to put enforcement teeth in the PARENT/TEACHER/STUDENT INVOLVEMENT ACCORD, discussed and signed yearly by all concerned parties. Failure to do that, we will only see more of the same old thing: poor student performance, both academically and socially.

    Blessings and Peace,

  3. Allowing a little for economies of scale in CC and WC, DSA should be relatively equal among the 17 SD's. However, there should NOT be any discrimination for low-income and non-English speaking students. The normal, average kids need basic K-12 and need adequate instruction and attention so they can learn to read and write. This country is based on equal rights and equal opportunity, NOT skewing things for ANY special interest group or minority (there being no majority.)

  4. There are so few kids in the rural counties that the issue is de minimus.