Las Vegas Sun

April 27, 2015

Currently: 73° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account


Student loan rates the next fight on D.C. lawmakers’ agenda


Steve Marcus

Students walk southbound in the quad area during the first day of the fall semester at UNLV Monday, August 23, 2010.

High school graduations begin this week in Nevada, and seniors will be unleashed to pursue post-secondary plans, which for many, include a turn through college.

As graduates collect their diplomas, lawmakers in Washington will be working to try to guarantee them a more affordable chance to continue their education.

The country is coming up on a familiar deadline: On July 1, interest rates on federal student loans are set to double, from 3.4 percent to 6.8 percent. Such a change would be costly for students who are borrowing to pay for higher education.

But preventing the rate hike won't be easy. In the past several weeks, lawmakers — from the freshest faces in Congress on up to the White House — have floated at least half a dozen proposals to keep interest rates low while also controlling government costs.

Unfortunately, the ideas aren’t necessarily compatible. Some are permanent fixes; other are temporary. Some propose fixed interest rates; others advocate letting them vary with market forces. And some incorporate rate ceilings to guarantee students a worst-case scenario.

The first of the bills is expected on the Senate floor for a vote Thursday. The Democratic proposal would extend the current rate and offset the cost by closing certain tax loopholes, including those enjoyed by the oil and gas industry. The extension would last two years.

It's a nonstarter with Republicans.

“We reject the idea of a short-term political fix,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., the ranking member of the Senate committee that handles education policy, on Tuesday. “There’s no reason why we can’t work together with the president and the House of Representatives to come up with a permanent solution for student loans that reduces rates for 100 percent of new loans, and do it by July 1.”

President Barack Obama and the House both favor proposals that would tie the interest rate to the market rate — specifically the 10-year Treasury note — plus a set margin. Obama’s would make the initial loan rate fixed while the House’s proposal would let it vary, capping Stafford loans at 8.5 percent and PLUS loans at 10.5 percent.

Stafford and PLUS loans are the two types of federal student loans available: Stafford loans are for student borrowers, while PLUS loans are for the parents of students. Stafford loans may be either subsidized or unsubsidized, with the subsidized-interest loans going to student borrowers demonstrating financial need.

Senate Republicans also advocate pegging the student loan rate to the market rate.

But for now, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is equally opposed to the Republicans’ preferred approach.

“We have no reason to work out a compromise,” Reid said Tuesday. “If we do nothing, the rates double; if we follow what the (Republican-led) House does, they more than triple. So I’m not looking for compromise, I’m looking for passing our bill.”

The rigidity on all sides ensures that passing a change to the interest rates will be a challenge. If Reid’s attempt to push through the Senate Democrats’ bill on Thursday fails, that poses a potential conundrum.

Reid is hoping to take up student loans Thursday after the Senate wraps up its work on the Farm Bill. But he has also promised to keep the Senate focused on immigration reform, which the chamber is expected to take up next week. That doesn’t leave much time for the student loan debate.

Last year, Republicans and Democrats argued for months before agreeing to offset the roughly $6 billion cost of extending lower interest rates by limiting how long students can be eligible for federal aid and changing the rules on pension program funding.

So far, no contingency plans are in place should Congress come close to missing the July 1 deadline.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 1 comment so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. As someone who had student loans and they were all 7% or higher loans, I am not sure that I see what the issue is here. I graduated with around $20,000 in loans and paid them off on schedule. But then I also graduated with marketable skills. We should be at least as concerned about why college costs have been rising faster than inflation, faster than even medical costs. If the rising cost of health care was such a big concern, why not the rising cost of higher education? With pay over the last couple of decades barely keeping up with inflation and the cost of higher education running at more than twice the rate of inflation, that should be the concern. Technology should be making it potentially easier and less expensive for people to get a decent college education, but that has not happened. We also need to not push people who are not ready for college into going. We have have increasing numbers of people who are taking out loans to go and then leaving without degrees after several years with thousands of dollars of debt. In the grand scheme of things, the potential rate hike is not necessarily the biggest issue here.