Las Vegas Sun

September 20, 2014

Currently: 89° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

With heat on, NV Energy employs ‘peakers’ to help keep us cool

Supplementary power generators part of utility’s strategy during peak demand periods

Image

NV Energy

Peakers at the Clark Generating Station in Henderson were installed in 2009 at a cost of $400 million to help the plant deal with power fluctuations, ranging from heavy use in the summer to random weather conditions affecting solar- and wind-energy gathering. The 12 supplementary power stations at the plant can provide enough energy to power more than a third of a million homes.

With weekend temperatures threatening to reach record-breaking numbers, it’s no surprise that NV Energy technicians have a plan to keep up with projected and equally record-breaking energy demands.

What’s interesting, however, is how they plan to do it.

Rather than buy extra power on the expensive energy market, NV Energy will rely on peaking units — supplementary power stations that, in less than 10 minutes after being fired up, can provide enough energy to power more than a third of a million homes, said Lloyd “Andy” Anderson, operations manager of NV Energy’s Edward W. Clark Generating Station.

And days like Saturday and Sunday are why the peakers were designed and installed, Anderson said.

“These are the days that these units were really were built for,” he said.

The peakers at the Clark Generating Station in Henderson were installed in 2009 at a cost of $400 million to help the plant deal with power fluctuations, ranging from heavy demand in the summer to random weather conditions affecting solar- and wind-energy gathering, Anderson said. The 12 units at the Henderson plant are the only ones in operation in Southern Nevada, said Mark Severts, project communications director.

And though the natural gas-run power units can be more expensive than the plant’s normal generators, use of the peakers allows NV Energy to immediately respond to energy fluctuations and to free the company from potentially high market prices, Anderson said.

“When we fill that gap with our own power, it allows the market to normalize more,” he said.

Responding that quickly to energy demands can save consumer costs from ballooning too high during the summer, Anderson said. Though it’s difficult to gauge how much money is saved due to constantly changing energy demands and market conditions, use of the peakers is estimated to cut costs by about half when compared with buying extra energy on the open market, he said.

“There is no question that during times like today and during such hot spells, these units are paying for themselves in a dramatic way by allowing us to avoid purchasing high-cost power during such expensive, high-energy-demand times,” Severts said.

The peaking units can produce up to a combined 600 megawatts of electricity at any given time — enough to power about 370,000 homes — in less than 10 minutes, Severts said. That estimation also takes into account high air conditioning use, which means the units could power up to 600,000 homes without heavy electrical usage, he said.

That capacity could prove useful this weekend, when NV Energy projects to use up to 6,000 megawatts at any given time in the Las Vegas Valley, about 200 megawatts more than the electricity demand record set in July of 2007, when temperatures hit 114 degrees here.

Last year, there were around 400 starts for any number of the plant’s 12 peaking units, with run times averaging about four hours, Anderson said.

The peaking units essentially run like a jet turbine engine, with additional equipment set up to recycle the exhaust produced by the engines into more energy, Severts said. The units replaced several older generators, installed in the 1950s, that produced about half the amount of energy with twice as many emissions, he said.

Calling the shots of when to run the peaking units is a team of four dispatchers, most with more than 30 years of experience, who work with other staff members to determine when and for how long the units will run.

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 3 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Commenter Lvbadger brought up a good question that perhaps NVEnergy's Mark Severt can answer, "What guarantees do we have after the coal fired plants are shut down that Nevada/Buffet Power will be able to handle heat waves like this."

    Since Clark County, as a whole, is subject to one power company to provide services, is there an alternative in place, or being planned, that will insure seamless delivery of power? Maybe allowing the Federal Government to use Valley Power for Creech Air Force Base, could ease some of the demand/reliance the civilian population has of NVEnergy.

    Blessings and Peace,
    Star

  2. Part of the "plan" when they said they wanted to shut down the coal plant is that they have other services in place before the coal plans are closed. If that had not been part of the plan they could just shut them down now.

    Creech Air Force Base is no longer on NVEnergy's service. They lost that to a co-op service.

  3. Most utilities are a monopoly as the cost of the infrastructure is normally prohibitive and municipalities control the access of the infrastructure (do you want multiple electric utilities running power lines through your neighborhoods to provide your power so you have "Competition"). But as new technologies develop, then those same municipalities need to allow the access to the streets to deliver the new services.

    The Public Utility Commissions are supposed to represent the people of the state and ensure that the covered utilities are providing the level of service, rates charged are appropriate to cover the cost of the service being provided plus to allow an authorized level of profit to the company. They are also supposed to ensure that the utilities are planning for future growth and system replacement (i.e. new power plants and transmission lines).

    So just saying that NV Energy is what is wrong with the economy is an over simplification of the problem. The problem is not just what NV Energy does, it is also the oversight the PUC has provided. The free market is not necessarily the answer as that would invite chaos to an orderly delivery system that exists today.