Las Vegas Sun

August 30, 2014

Currently: 104° — Complete forecast | Log in | Create an account

POLITICS:

For Dean Heller, a ‘fresh start’ in Senate comes at frenetic pace

Image

Leila Navidi

Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., with his son Harris, from left, daughter Emmy, and wife Lynne celebrates his victory at the Palazzo in Las Vegas after midnight on Wednesday, November 7, 2012.

Dean Heller Wins Senate Seat

Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., with his Lynne, right, talks to the media after his victory at the Palazzo in Las Vegas after midnight on Wednesday, November 7, 2012. Launch slideshow »

Sen. Dean Heller looks at this new year as a fresh start — to the extent that anyone actually can have one in a place like the Senate when you’ve already been hanging around for a year and a half.

“I want it to feel like a fresh start, but it really hasn’t because we have so many issues,” Heller said during an interview this month in his office. “It just doesn’t slow down. So it’s kind of hard to take that deep breath you think you deserve after such a campaign.”

Heller, the Republican appointed to fill out John Ensign’s term when Ensign retired in mid-2011, eked out a close, 12,127-vote victory over his longtime colleague from the House of Representatives, Democrat Shelley Berkley, who challenged him for the Senate seat in November. The campaign was long and ugly, but in the end, Heller prevailed in a state President Barack Obama won handily — the only Republican senator to accomplish that kind of electoral feat.

In a way, the outcome changed nothing, as Heller was a senator before Nov. 6. In another, it changed everything.

“The difference of being elected as opposed to being appointed has made a huge difference,” Heller said. “You can see that there’s just a real dynamic between people who have been through the wars and the battles that it takes to be where we are today and those who haven’t. I think they wanted to see me tested first.”

He’s talking about his peers, those 47 senators, soon to be 45, who make up the Republican caucus.

For a junior senator operating in the highly politicized environment of Congress, having the support of the team — especially the players at the top — is crucial to getting any pet projects noticed. Heller now feels as if he’s earned those key senators’ respect.

“They know now that I’m a member of this body and what I say, my concerns, my experiences matter as much as theirs do,” Heller said. “Things that are important to me are now important to them.”

Heller’s challenge is figuring out where and how to apply the authority of his now-sanctioned office.

For now, he seems focused on addressing issues that grew directly out of the election.

Heller’s portfolio for 2013, as he’s loosely defined it, is shaped by his experience in the 2012 election season. He won the Senate seat. But he lost the women’s vote. He also lost the increasingly important Hispanic vote. And it’s apparent that Heller is aware of how that, in any other environment, could be a serious problem.

“It’s my belief the Republican Party needs to reach out and be much more inclusive,” Heller said, advocating that Republicans start “talking about campaigns of addition as opposed to subtraction.”

“We need to bring in the immigration population and let them know that what the Republicans are doing is in their best interest,” Heller said. “We have women issues, which you saw during the campaign — whether it was in Missouri or Indiana, the comments that were made by some of these candidates were wrong, they were stupid.”

Heller, who has a history of voting against immigration measures in Congress and assured constituents that “I don’t support amnesty. ... I don’t support the Dream Act” in his first race for federal office, has in the weeks since his victory embraced everything about the Dream Act except its name.

“My focus today is to make sure we have more of a humanitarian approach going forward and making sure those who are in this country by no choice of their own but have contributed ... to the American way of life ought to have an opportunity and a chance for citizenship without having to be deported,” Heller said.

But he doesn’t have as central a position angling for immigration legislation as many Nevada Republicans had hoped he would.

A December Politico report identified a new “gang of 8” senators working to craft immigration legislation. It includes senators who were in the trenches last time immigration came to the fore in 2007, such as Democratic Sens. Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin, and Republican Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham. It also includes new Republican Sen. Jeff Flake, who had worked on immigration in the House.

But it does not include Heller.

“Most of the people in that group are the people who have history discussing the immigration policy issue,” Heller said. “And I don’t take any offense. I don’t mind taking a supportive role.”

Heller is placing his bets on another outsider: Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who in the past year was rumored to be working on a Dream Act alternative that never materialized. Heller has focused his efforts to be involved in the process chiefly on Rubio, though he was not reported as being part of the ad hoc Senate immigration group.

“I think Rubio is the key to this. He’s the individual who’s going to determine the success of any bipartisan immigration policy going forward,” Heller said. “I’ve just offered up my help and support, coming through a campaign in the state where immigration plays a big role, if they want my feedback, my thoughts.

“And they do, they have assured me that they do.”

Heller also is gearing up for a 2013 turn at online poker — which may prove to be the truest test of his newfound clout in his caucus.

In mid-December, Sen. Harry Reid declared online poker officially dead for the duration of the 112th Congress, turning it into a 2013 issue. With that announcement, Heller graduated to the rank of chief Republican on the poker issue, as Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona — Reid’s across-the-aisle partner on poker issues during this past Congress — retires this year.

“That’s a big change. That is a substantial variable in the process moving forward,” Heller said. “I don’t know yet how that changes the dynamics of the legislation moving forward.”

Heller has been fully integrated in the poker process the past few months and considers himself ready to take on the task — in fact, he is actively trying to sell the merits of online poker to his colleagues. But he’s also aware that he is not the Senate’s No. 2 ranking Republican.

“Kyl’s the whip, and Kyl’s relationships were obviously very helpful with the other members of our conference,” Heller said, explaining that Kyl’s history of having been a key booster of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act in 2006 made him a compelling salesman for the new online poker bill. Heller was not yet in Congress when that was passed.

Heller listed at least four Republican senators he’s been recently working to get on board with online poker during the half-hour interview, sounding optimistic about Sens. Jerry Moran, Rob Portman, Lamar Alexander and Pat Roberts. Roberts, Heller said, told him “you’re right” about the need to support a bill.

Even if Heller can whip up his approximately 15 requisite Republicans — a number thrown out by Reid this year — he still will have to worry about working his old House Republican colleagues to get it passed.

“I was hoping it would start in the House,” Heller said of the poker process, recalling how he had made that point in a letter to Reid in early September, which played into an ugly catfight between Reid's and Heller’s offices before the election. “I think now it’s got to come from the Senate, but I don’t know at the end of the day how you solve the problem in the House.”

Past that, Heller is still looking for the next place to try to make a mark.

He did not get his coveted Finance Committee assignment, but Heller will have a few years of seniority under his belt on Energy and Natural Resources, where he will have the opportunity to establish himself as an operator on energy policy — which there is pressure to tackle after immigration — and public lands issues, which remain important to Nevada. Heller and Reid laid the groundwork to start off on the right foot there, with a bill to approve land swaps in Lyon County that they likely will put more muscle behind in 2013.

Heller also expressed an interest in continuing to work with the public advocacy group No Labels, which did some rabble-rousing for Heller’s No Budget, No Pay Act that would have stripped lawmakers of their pay for every day they didn’t pass a budget, starting in February. Heller says he thinks the group, which projects a generalized call for more functionality in Congress, has “real opportunity to start picking up” in 2013.

Through No Labels and other avenues, Heller appears to be taking pains to project a political profile that is as centrist as it is Republican. To wit, his recent comments on Obamacare: “It’s the law of the land. ... It’s not going to be repealed. It’s not going to be substantially changed. President Obama got re-elected. Let’s move on.”

That, from the senator who said he was “proud” to vote twice for Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget, which restructured Medicare and rolled back Obamacare entirely.

Heller brushes off the suggestion that the vagaries of his positions on key issues are evidence that his politics are morphing or evolving.

“I think I’m very pragmatic and I want to get things done — whatever role I’ve had, I’ve embraced that role and do what’s necessary to get the work done,” Heller said matter-of-factly. “I don’t know if that necessarily changes your philosophy. It may change your policy of how you get things done, but I don’t know if it necessarily changes your philosophy.”

Heller defines his philosophy on Washington as a fairly simple rubric of three main priorities: The government should fix its spending problem but work to ensure safety and security, the highways and roads that support commerce, and safety net provisions — such as unemployment benefits — are taken care of.

And as a Nevadan in government, he adds fighting for Nevada issues, such as public lands and Yucca Mountain, to the list of responsibilities that come with the office.

There’s a new challenge for Heller, and for all of the Nevada delegation, in that endeavor. Ensign’s ethics scandal and the Berkley-Heller race that followed drove a sharp divide through the historically cooperative delegation. In fact, it’s been so long that Heller and Reid are the only members of next Congress’ six-man team that experienced the days when everyone used to work well together.

Heller stressed that he and Reid are in regular touch and that he expects to reach out to all the members of the Nevada delegation in the new year — especially Rep.-to-be Steven Horsford, whose newest 4th Congressional District covers some of the turf Heller used to represent.

He’s promising to work to keep everybody pressing as a team for Nevada’s priorities, especially public lands and Yucca Mountain. But he’s not promising peace and harmony — or even necessarily going for it — in the Silver State ranks.

“I don’t mind there being disagreement ... because I do think in the long run it produces better legislation,” Heller said. “Nevada’s always better off if we’re sitting down and talking.”

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy

Previous Discussion: 4 comments so far…

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. How does Heller reach out to women when he continues his love affair with big business and the radical right at their expense?

  2. Let's see. Lied about his opponent to get elected, then votes against a treaty to help people with disabilities. I'd say Heller fits in very well with the Republican caucus: he hates humanity.

  3. IMHO Senator Heller is all smoke-and-mirrors when it comes to the issue of online poker. He proved that earlier in the year when he abandoned Sen Reid's attempt to get the issue before the Senate.

    All his "talk" is just that... talk.

    In the last election, I didn't vote for either of our Senate candidates... one had more-than-just-questionable ethics investigation(s) hanging over her head and the other (Sen. Heller) doesn't give two squats about poker players in Nevada.

  4. He got the votes and is in. Now Senator Dean Heller must prove his salt in representing the concerns of the People of Nevada, and not the elite industries of Nevada. Is he a dyed in the wool Republican, who is lock step? Time will tell.

    Online poker is happening everywhere else in the world, and the USA needs to get with the program.

    Maybe illegal immigration can be "handled" differently. Suppose the USA cuts a deal with Mexico, and uses Baja Mexico as a type of place to send/deport those who are NOT legally in the USA to get their paperwork and permission for entry and residence process approved. While there, they can become literate, learn the laws of the USA, and perhaps gain some respect towards Americans and their culture. Their DREAM children can stay in the USA to prove themselves, with them staying/living with sponsors who are legally in the USA. For the scale of the problem, something drastic must be done. Our country is going downhill every day we delay. If this sounds like interment camps, it is not quite that, as these people are occupying the USA ILLEGALLY now---which is a criminal offense. Huge difference.

    Women faced inequitable treatment since the beginning of time. We live now in a world where women should have the same opportunity as anyone else, to work and receive fair compensation, purchase goods and products on equal footing, as well as housing. Much of the battle lies in culture, philosophy, and religion, which is old as time. Areas that women need support the greatest, is with healthcare. If they are not well, how can they care for their homes, children, work for a living? Society stills puts the load on the woman to be the primary caregiver.

    Our educational system is broken and I wish Senator Heller would pay attention to that. Nevada needs someone who will represent our needs in education in Washington, D.C., and get the job done. Enough land swapping so mining and other interests are forever prospering, while education in Nevada, the children who are Nevada's future, suffers!

    Have a Happy New Year 2013 everyone!
    Blessings and Peace,
    Star