Friday, Aug. 26, 2016 | 2 a.m.
While the free market is the most effective at setting prices and rates for products and services in a way that benefits all consumers, some politicians think federal government bureaucrats are more qualified to do this.
Although this mode of thinking is considered entirely antiquated by most, the notion of price controls made its way into the Dodd-Frank financial regulations legislation in 2010. The Durbin amendment, as it is known, allows the Federal Reserve to regulate the “interchange” fee charged to retailers when consumers use their debit cards to make purchases. This system has provided great benefits to consumers, who now use their debit cards for most of their regular spending in both brick-and-mortar retail stores and online retailers.
Supporters of the Durbin amendment claimed the interchange fees charged for the processing of Visa and Mastercard debit charges were too high, and that regulation would lower them, which would benefit consumers.
However, the small fees associated with debit card transactions were willingly paid by retailers, who almost always charge the same prices on products for cash buyers as well as those using their debit cards because they knew the convenience of accepting debit card payments leads to more sales. Any retailer refusing to accept debit cards as payment would register far fewer sales in an age when most consumers use debit cards for nearly all of their retail purchases.
Soon after President Barack Obama signed Dodd-Frank, including the Durbin amendment, into law, many of the largest banks increased their fees on basic checking accounts. Additionally, many banks offering free checking discontinued that, leading today to free checking being almost nonexistent. While most banks offered free checking before, only 39 percent of banks nationally offer free checking just two years after Dodd-Frank became law.
As a result of the regulations under the Durbin amendment, the interchange fees on the use of debit cards come at the disadvantage of smaller purchases, at the expense of consumers.
“Is it really fair to make the local bagel store owner pay the same 22-cent fee on a $1 order that a jewelry store owner does on a $350 order? Should consumers really be paying billions of dollars extra a year for a service that businesses are willingly ascribing to?” asked Andrew Quinlan, writing for The Daily Caller.
The disappearance of free debit cards and free checking accounts is highlighted by the “Durbin Dollars” campaign from the Competitive Enterprise Institute. The group urges citizens to send to Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., the author of the Durbin amendment, the “Durbin Dollar” that features the senator’s picture, has a $5 face value, representing the typical monthly fee banks charge for checking accounts, noting the end of free debit cards and free checking that most consumers enjoyed before Dodd-Frank.
“Just as bad money drives out good money, our Durbin Dollars show that bad policies drive out good products, such as free debit cards and free checking,” said Sam Kazman, general counsel at the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
Retailers were expected to save about $36 billion from lower interchange fees expected from enacting the Durbin amendment, but those savings were pocketed instead of being turned over to consumers in the form of lower prices. Essentially, the lowering of the fees resulted in a “merchant markup” that benefits retailers and not consumers. A consumer group called the Electronic Payments Coalition has launched a campaign in favor of repealing the Durbin amendment, called “Stop the Merchant Markup.”
Rep. Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas, the chairman of the House Financial Institutions Subcommittee, has introduced a measure to remedy this issue. The legislation would repeal section 1075 (the Durbin amendment) of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010, commonly known as Dodd-Frank.
“Today, I introduced H.R. 5465, which will repeal the misguided debit swipe fee reforms introduced by the Dodd-Frank Act. Section 1075 of the Dodd-Frank Act, commonly called the Durbin amendment, represents an egregious example of the federal government picking winners and losers. Simply put, it represents crony capitalism at its worst,” Neugebauer said.
The Consumer Bankers Association, a group representing citizens and small-business owners, issued a letter supporting the Neugebauer legislation to repeal the Durbin amendment, noting its benefits to consumers.
“Flawed policies like the Durbin amendment that pick winners and losers with little consideration of the market impact ultimately harm consumers. Merchants promised price controls would allow them to pass along savings — about $8 billion annually — to consumers in the form of lower prices,” the CBA letter states. “Ironically, this call for market intervention came from some of the same merchants who have since demanded the government stay out of business decisions on soft drink sizes and menu offerings.”
As with all attempts by the government to set price controls, the Durbin amendment clearly has not worked. Those who understand how the free market works predicted this and were right. The further that Rep. Neugebauer’s legislation to repeal this mistake goes forward, the more likely consumer benefits in lower prices financial services will return. Repealing the Durbin amendment would once again bring about more choices for better financial services, to the benefit of all banking customers.
Dean Chambers is a blogger who has written news and commentary articles on a variety of subjects. He wrote this for insidesources.com.