Saturday, May 25, 2024 | 2 a.m.
View more of the Sun's opinion section
It is understandable, as the May 19 letter “Hunting licenses help wildlife” notes, that responsible, ethical hunting might address concerns about wildlife experiencing starvation or slow disease, especially in our challenging environment. That is a horrible way for an animal to die.
However, there is a distinction between wanton hunts and the humane treatment and justifiable management of wildlife. It is also not solely the hunters among us who contribute to wildlife conservation, and there may be differing motivations for wanting to perpetuate certain species.
The Pittman-Robertson Act provides funding toward conservation based upon a tax on all ammunition and gun sales, not just hunters’ purchases. Since hunting has been on the decline over the past six decades, it’s fair to assume that as time goes by, fewer purchasers of guns and ammo are hunters.
Non-hunting outdoor enthusiasts have also generated revenue for state wildlife agency conservation projects in the way of licenses/permits and entrance/recreation fees for boating and other outdoor activities. Equipment and gear related to these activities is also taxed, where a portion is allocated to conservation and habitat restoration projects.
Non-hunting pursuits such as wildlife photography, rock climbing, hiking, camping, kayaking and other ecotourism contribute to local economies through spending on accommodations, dining, transportation and guided tours. This economic activity generates tax revenue that may support wildlife management and conservation initiatives.
In my outdoor pursuits, I have contributed $425 thus far toward wildlife conservation and encourage others to enjoy the outdoors and contribute in a similar way.
